4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Evaluation of In Vitro Hemolysis and Platelet Activation of a Newly Developed MagLev LVAD and Two Clinically Used LVADs with Human Blood

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In-vitro hemolysis testing remains one of the most important performance measures to judge the hemocompatibility of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Clinically relevant operating conditions and appropriate testing blood are essential to infer in-vitro data for potential clinical use. This in-vitro study was carried out to evaluate and compare the hemolytic performance of a newly developed magnetically levitated (maglev) LVAD (CH-VAD) with two clinically used LVADs (HVAD and HeartMate II) using fresh human blood. A small volume (~300 ml) in-vitro circulating flow loop was constructed with an LVAD generated flow of 4.5 LPM at the nominal or reported clinical operating speed for each LVAD. The blood was circulated in the loop for 4 hours with samples drawn at baseline and hourly. Plasma free hemoglobin (PFH) concentrations in the hourly blood samples were determined with spectrophotometry. Normalized index of hemolysis (NIH) was calculated to compare the hemolytic performance of the CH-VAD and the two reference LVADs. Platelet activation was measured with flow cytometry. The experimental test for each device was repeated at least seven times. The data from this study showed that all the three LVADs generated very low hemolysis (NIH <0.01 g/100L). The CH-VAD was found to have a significantly lower NIH value (0.00135 +/− 0.00032 g/100L) compared to the HVAD (0.00525 +/− 0.00183 g/100L) and the HeartMate II (0.00583 +/− 0.00182 g/100L). No statistically significant difference in device-generated hemolysis was found between the HVAD and the HeartMate II. The level of platelet activation induced by the CH-VAD is significantly lower than those by the HVAD and the HeartMate II. The data suggest that the shear-induced hemolysis and platelet activation of the CH-VAD are acceptable relative to the two LVADs currently in clinical use.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          7802778
          880
          Artif Organs
          Artif Organs
          Artificial organs
          0160-564X
          1525-1594
          17 April 2019
          22 May 2019
          September 2019
          01 September 2020
          : 43
          : 9
          : 870-879
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA
          [2 ]Fischell Department of Bioengineering, A. James Clark School of Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742,USA
          Author notes
          Correspondence: Zhongjun J. Wu, Ph.D. Department of Surgery, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 10 South Pine Street, MSTF 434A, Baltimore, MD, 21201, USA, Tel: 410-706-7715, Fax: 410-706-0311, zwu@ 123456som.umaryland.edu
          Author information
          http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4305-0361
          Article
          PMC6733624 PMC6733624 6733624 nihpa1024247
          10.1111/aor.13471
          6733624
          31001834
          cb0c9b6a-3bf5-45af-a524-c358a6159c30
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Magnetically levitated blood pump,left ventricular assist device,hemocompatibility,hemolysis

          Comments

          Comment on this article