14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Sleep deprivation alters choice strategy without altering uncertainty or loss aversion preferences

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Sleep deprivation alters decision making; however, it is unclear what specific cognitive processes are modified to drive altered choices. In this manuscript, we examined how one night of total sleep deprivation (TSD) alters economic decision making. We specifically examined changes in uncertainty preferences dissociably from changes in the strategy with which participants engage with presented choice information. With high test-retest reliability, we show that TSD does not alter uncertainty preferences or loss aversion. Rather, TSD alters the information the participants rely upon to make their choices. Utilizing a choice strategy metric which contrasts the influence of maximizing and satisficing information on choice behavior, we find that TSD alters the relative reliance on maximizing information and satisficing information, in the gains domain. This alteration is the result of participants both decreasing their reliance on cognitively-complex maximizing information and a concomitant increase in the use of readily-available satisficing information. TSD did not result in a decrease in overall information use in either domain. These results show that sleep deprivation alters decision making by altering the informational strategies that participants employ, without altering their preferences.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty

          Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Risk, Ambiguity, and the Savage Axioms

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The neural basis of loss aversion in decision-making under risk.

              People typically exhibit greater sensitivity to losses than to equivalent gains when making decisions. We investigated neural correlates of loss aversion while individuals decided whether to accept or reject gambles that offered a 50/50 chance of gaining or losing money. A broad set of areas (including midbrain dopaminergic regions and their targets) showed increasing activity as potential gains increased. Potential losses were represented by decreasing activity in several of these same gain-sensitive areas. Finally, individual differences in behavioral loss aversion were predicted by a measure of neural loss aversion in several regions, including the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortex.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurosci
                Front Neurosci
                Front. Neurosci.
                Frontiers in Neuroscience
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1662-4548
                1662-453X
                06 October 2015
                2015
                : 9
                : 352
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, National University of Singapore Singapore, Singapore
                [2] 2SINAPSE Institute, National University of Singapore Singapore, Singapore
                [3] 3Neuroscience and Behavioral Disorders Program, Centre for Cognitive Neuroscience, Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Singapore
                [4] 4Division of Social Sciences, Yale-NUS College Singapore, Singapore
                Author notes

                Edited by: Hauke R. Heekeren, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany

                Reviewed by: V. S. Chandrasekhar Pammi, University of Allahabad, India; Paul E. M. Phillips, University of Washington, USA

                *Correspondence: O'Dhaniel A. Mullette-Gillman, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, National University of Singapore, Block AS4, Level 2, 9 Arts Link, Singapore 117570, Singapore odhaniel@ 123456gmail.com

                This article was submitted to Decision Neuroscience, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neuroscience

                Article
                10.3389/fnins.2015.00352
                4593856
                cb1c3a02-4dfd-4860-b643-ae21ae487265
                Copyright © 2015 Mullette-Gillman, Kurnianingsih and Liu.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 October 2014
                : 16 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 36, Pages: 12, Words: 8791
                Categories
                Neuroscience
                Original Research

                Neurosciences
                sleep deprivation,decision making,preferences,strategy,risk,ambiguity,loss aversion
                Neurosciences
                sleep deprivation, decision making, preferences, strategy, risk, ambiguity, loss aversion

                Comments

                Comment on this article