21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Priming, response learning and repetition suppression

      research-article
      , *
      Neuropsychologia
      Pergamon Press
      Perception, Memory, Fusiform, Prefrontal, fMRI

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prior exposure to a stimulus can facilitate its subsequent identification and classification, a phenomenon called priming. This behavioural facilitation is usually accompanied by a reduction in neural response within specific cortical regions (repetition suppression, RS). Recent research has suggested that both behavioural priming and RS can be largely determined by previously learned stimulus–response associations. According to this view, a direct association forms between the stimulus presented and the response made to it. On a subsequent encounter with the stimulus, this association automatically cues the response, bypassing the various processing stages that were required to select that response during its first presentation. Here we reproduce behavioural evidence for such stimulus–response associations, and show the PFC to be sensitive to such changes. In contrast, RS within ventral temporal regions (such as the fusiform cortex), which are usually associated with perceptual processing, is shown to be robust to response changes. The present study therefore suggests a dissociation between RS within the PFC, which may be sensitive to retrieval of stimulus–response associations, and RS within posterior perceptual regions, which may reflect facilitation of perceptual processing independent of stimulus–response associations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects.

          One of the most robust experience-related cortical dynamics is reduced neural activity when stimuli are repeated. This reduction has been linked to performance improvements due to repetition and also used to probe functional characteristics of neural populations. However, the underlying neural mechanisms are as yet unknown. Here, we consider three models that have been proposed to account for repetition-related reductions in neural activity, and evaluate them in terms of their ability to account for the main properties of this phenomenon as measured with single-cell recordings and neuroimaging techniques. We also discuss future directions for distinguishing between these models, which will be important for understanding the neural consequences of repetition and for interpreting repetition-related effects in neuroimaging data.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Toward an instance theory of automatization.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory.

              Cognitive control mechanisms permit memory to be accessed strategically, and so aid in bringing knowledge to mind that is relevant to current goals and actions. In this review, we consider the contribution of left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) to the cognitive control of memory. Reviewed evidence supports a two-process model of mnemonic control, supported by a double dissociation among rostral regions of left VLPFC. Specifically, anterior VLPFC (approximately BA 47; inferior frontal gyrus pars orbitalis) supports controlled access to stored conceptual representations, whereas mid-VLPFC (approximately BA 45; inferior frontal gyrus pars triangularis) supports a domain-general selection process that operates post-retrieval to resolve competition among active representations. We discuss the contribution of these control mechanisms across a range of mnemonic domains, including semantic retrieval, recollection of contextual details about past events, resolution of proactive interference in working memory, and task switching. Finally, we consider open directions for future research into left VLPFC function and the cognitive control of memory.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Neuropsychologia
                Neuropsychologia
                Pergamon Press
                0028-3932
                1873-3514
                June 2008
                June 2008
                : 46
                : 7
                : 1979-1991
                Affiliations
                MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge CB2 7EF, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 1223 355 294x522; fax: +44 1223 359 062. rik.henson@ 123456mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk
                Article
                NSY2850
                10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.01.018
                2430995
                18328508
                cb282b7d-9f08-4a03-bc75-226b12abc6c3
                © 2008 Elsevier Ltd.

                This document may be redistributed and reused, subject to certain conditions.

                History
                : 15 October 2007
                : 17 January 2008
                : 25 January 2008
                Categories
                Article

                Neurology
                memory,fusiform,perception,prefrontal,fmri
                Neurology
                memory, fusiform, perception, prefrontal, fmri

                Comments

                Comment on this article