19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Correlation Between Intrasac Pressure Measurements of a Pressure Sensor and an Angiographic Catheter During Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          PURPOSE

          To establish a correlation between intrasac pressure measurements of a pressure sensor and an angiographic catheter placed in the same aneurysm sac before and after its exclusion by an endoprosthesis.

          METHODS

          Patients who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and received an EndoSure TM wireless pressure sensor implant between March 19 and December 11, 2004 were enrolled in the study. Simultaneous readings of systolic, diastolic, mean, and pulse pressure within the aneurysm sac were obtained from the catheter and the sensor, both before and after sac exclusion by the endoprosthesis (Readings 1 and 2, respectively). Intrasac pressure measurements were compared using Pearson’s correlation and Student’s t test. Statistical significance was set at p<0.05.

          RESULTS

          Twenty-five patients had the pressure sensor implanted, with simultaneous readings (i.e., recorded by both devices) obtained in 19 patients for Reading 1 and in 10 patients for Reading 2. There was a statistically significant correlation for all pressure variables during both readings, with p<0.01 for all except the pulse pressure in Reading 1 (p<0.05). Statistical significance of pressure variations before and after abdominal aortic aneurysm exclusion was coincident between the sensor and catheter for diastolic (p>0.05), mean (p>0.05), and pulse (p<0.01) pressures; the sole disagreement was observed for systolic pressure, which varied, on average, 31.23 mmHg by the catheter (p<0.05) and 22 mmHg (p>0.05) by the sensor.

          CONCLUSION

          The excellent agreement between intrasac pressure readings recorded by the catheter and the sensor justifies use of the latter for detection of post-exclusion abdominal aortic aneurysm pressurization.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Significance of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: The EUROSTAR experience.

          The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and consequences of endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Data on 2463 patients were collected from 87 European centers and recorded in a central database. Preoperative data were compared for patients with collateral retrograde perfusion (type II) endoleak (group A), patients with device-related (type I and III) endoleaks (group B), and patients in whom no endoleak was detected (group C). Only endoleaks observed after the first postoperative month of follow-up were taken into consideration. Regression analysis was performed to investigate statistical relationships between the occurrence and type of endoleak and preoperative patient and morphologic characteristics, operative details, type of device, and experience of the operating team. In addition, postoperative changes in aneurysmal morphology, the need for secondary interventions, conversions to open repair, aneurysmal rupture, and mortality during follow-up were compared between these study groups. Patients in group A had a higher prevalence of a patent inferior mesenteric artery compared with patients without endoleak. Patients in group B were treated more frequently than patients in group C by an operating team with experience of less than 30 procedures. The mean follow-up period was 15.4 months. Secondary interventions were needed in 13% of the patients. Rupture of the aneurysm during follow-up occurred in 0.52% (1/191) in group A, 3.37% (10/297) in group B, and 0.25% (5/1975) in group C. Life table analysis comparing the three study groups demonstrated a significantly higher rate of rupture in group B than in group C (P =.002). The incidence of conversion to open repair during follow-up was higher in group B than in the other two study groups (P <.01). Death was related to the aneurysm or to endovascular repair of the aneurysm in 7% of patients. Secondary outcome success, defined as absence of rupture and conversion, was significantly higher in group A and C compared with that in group B (P =.006 and P =.0001, respectively). The presence of device-related endoleaks correlated with a higher risk of aneurysmal rupture and conversion compared with patients without type I or III endoleaks. Type II endoleak was not associated more often with these events. Consequently, intervention in type II endoleak should only be performed in case of increase of aneurysm size.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Cellular content and permeability of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysm.

            A pathologic feature commonly associated with abdominal aortic aneurysms is the presence of variably sized and shaped intraluminal thrombus, which may be fundamental to the disease process. However, the precise role of the intraluminal thrombus in the formation, enlargement, and rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysms is unknown. The hypothesis tested in this study was whether there were structural features of aortic thrombi to suggest that it may be involved in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms. We have investigated this hypothesis using a variety of structural and biochemical techniques. Tests performed were light, transmission, and scanning electron microscopy; fluid permeability measurements; and Western blots. Intraluminal thrombus found in abdominal aortic aneurysms is structurally complex and is traversed from the luminal to abluminal surface by a continuous network of interconnected canaliculi. Quantitative microscopic analysis of the thrombus shows cellular penetration for at least 1 cm from the luminal surface of the thrombus. Macro-molecular penetration may be unrestricted throughout the entire thickness of the thrombus. Fibrin deposition occurred throughout the thrombus, whereas fibrin degradation occurred principally at the abluminal surface. These principally structural studies support the hypothesis that the thrombus is a self-sustaining entity that may have significance in the pathophysiologic mechanism of abdominal aortic aneurysms.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predicting aneurysm enlargement in patients with persistent type II endoleaks.

              The clinical significance of type II endoleaks is not well understood. Some evidence, however, indicates that some type II endoleaks might result in aneurysm enlargement and rupture. To identify factors that might contribute to aneurysm expansion, we analyzed the influence of several variables on aneurysm growth in patients with persistent type II endoleaks after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). In a series of 348 EVARs performed during a 10-year period, 32 patients (9.2%) developed type II endoleaks that persisted for more than 6 months. Variables analyzed included those defined by the reporting standards for EVAR (SVS/AAVS) as well as other endoleak characteristics. Univariate, receiver operating characteristic curve, and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the association between variables and aneurysm enlargement. The median follow-up period was 26.5 months (range, 6-88 months). Thirteen patients (41%) had aneurysm enlargement by 5 mm or more (median increase in diameter, 10 mm), whereas 19 (59%) had stable or shrinking aneurysm diameter. Univariate and Cox regression analyses identified the maximum diameter of the endoleak cavity, ie, the size of the nidus as defined on contrast computed tomography scan, as a significant predictor for aneurysm enlargement (relative risk, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.04-1.19; P =.001). The median size of the nidus was 23 mm (range, 13-40 mm) in patients with aneurysm enlargement and 8 mm (range, 5-25 mm) in those without expansion (Mann-Whitney U test, P <.001). Moreover, receiver operating characteristic curve and Cox regression analyses showed that a maximum nidus diameter greater than 15 mm was particularly associated with an increased risk of aneurysm enlargement (relative risk, 11.1; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-85.8; P =.02). Other risk factors including gender, smoking history, hypertension, need of anticoagulation, aneurysm diameter, type of endograft used, and number or type of collateral vessels were not significant predictors of aneurysm enlargement. In patients with persistent type II endoleaks after EVAR, the maximum diameter of the endoleak cavity or nidus is an important predictor of aneurysm growth and might indicate the need for more aggressive surveillance as well as earlier treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Clinics
                Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)
                Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
                1807-5932
                1980-5322
                February 2008
                : 63
                : 1
                : 59-66
                Affiliations
                General Surgery, Federal University of Santa Catarina - Florianópolis/SC cwtmiller@ 123456yahoo.com.br
                Article
                cln63_1p0059
                2664183
                18297208
                cb380fc0-f72c-4753-8fd8-577a9cb81686
                Copyright © 2008 Hospital das Clínicas da FMUSP
                History
                : 11 October 2007
                : 7 November 2007
                Categories
                Basic Research

                Medicine
                aneurysm sac,endoprosthesis,pressure measurements,endoleak,post-exclusion
                Medicine
                aneurysm sac, endoprosthesis, pressure measurements, endoleak, post-exclusion

                Comments

                Comment on this article