8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Accuracy and Usefulness of Select Methods for Assessing Complete Collection of 24-Hour Urine: A Systematic Review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Twenty-four–hour urine collection is the recommended method for estimating sodium intake. To investigate the strengths and limitations of methods used to assess completion of 24-hour urine collection, the authors systematically reviewed the literature on the accuracy and usefulness of methods vs para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) recovery (referent). The percentage of incomplete collections, based on PABA, was 6% to 47% (n=8 studies). The sensitivity and specificity for identifying incomplete collection using creatinine criteria (n=4 studies) was 6% to 63% and 57% to 99.7%, respectively. The most sensitive method for removing incomplete collections was a creatinine index <0.7. In pooled analysis (≥2 studies), mean urine creatinine excretion and volume were higher among participants with complete collection ( P<.05); whereas, self-reported collection time did not differ by completion status. Compared with participants with incomplete collection, mean 24-hour sodium excretion was 19.6 mmol higher (n=1781 specimens, 5 studies) in patients with complete collection. Sodium excretion may be underestimated by inclusion of incomplete 24-hour urine collections. None of the current approaches reliably assess completion of 24-hour urine collection.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          100888554
          22404
          J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)
          J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich)
          Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)
          1524-6175
          1751-7176
          24 July 2017
          03 January 2016
          May 2016
          11 September 2017
          : 18
          : 5
          : 456-467
          Affiliations
          [1 ]Epidemiology & Surveillance Branch, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
          [2 ]Departments of Medicine, Physiology and Pharmacology and Community Health Sciences, O’Brien Institute for Public Health and, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
          [3 ]Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood Victoria, Australia
          [4 ]Unit of Noncommunicable Diseases & Disabilities, Department of Noncommunicable Diseases and Mental Health, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, DC, USA
          Author notes
          Address for correspondence: Katherine A. John, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, 4770 Buford Highway, NE MS F-77, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717, yfr6@ 123456cdc.gov
          Article
          PMC5592696 PMC5592696 5592696 hhspa848416
          10.1111/jch.12763
          5592696
          26726000
          cb586d9f-c368-4154-86ee-ce050d2a0286
          History
          Categories
          Article

          Comments

          Comment on this article