15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Comparison of the biological properties of ProRoot MTA, OrthoMTA, and Endocem MTA cements.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          OrthoMTA (BioMTA, Seoul, Korea) and Endocem MTA (Maruchi, Wonju-si, Korea) were recently developed to overcome the disadvantages of ProRoot MTA (Dentsply, Tulsa, OK). This study aimed to compare the biological properties of OrthoMTA and Endocem MTA with those of ProRoot MTA using the preosteoblastlike cell line MC3T3-E1.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Endod
          Journal of endodontics
          Elsevier BV
          1878-3554
          0099-2399
          Oct 2014
          : 40
          : 10
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Conservative Dentistry, Ulsan University, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
          [2 ] Department of Conservative Dentistry, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
          [3 ] Department of Conservative Dentistry, Ulsan University, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: hyunjko@gmail.com.
          Article
          S0099-2399(14)00427-0
          10.1016/j.joen.2014.04.013
          25052144
          cb62ffb8-0072-4fb0-9c51-af35aece921c
          History

          osteopontin,cytotoxicity,ProRoot MTA,Calcium silicate–based cements,MC3T3-E1 cell,Endocem MTA,OrthoMTA

          Comments

          Comment on this article