2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Phase II study of Radium‐223 dichloride combined with hormonal therapy for hormone receptor‐positive, bone‐dominant metastatic breast cancer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Radium‐223 dichloride (Ra‐223) is a targeted alpha therapy that induces localized cytotoxicity in bone metastases. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of Ra‐223 plus hormonal therapy in hormone receptor‐positive (HR+), bone‐dominant metastatic breast cancer.

          Methods

          In this single‐center phase II study, 36 patients received Ra‐223 (55 kBq/kg intravenously every 4 weeks) up to 6 cycles with endocrine therapy. The primary objective was to determine the clinical disease control rate at 9 months. Secondary objectives were to determine (a) tumor response rate at 6 months, (b) progression‐free survival (PFS) durations, and (c) safety.

          Results

          The median number of prior systemic treatments for metastatic disease was 1 (range, 0‐4). The disease control rate at 9 months was 49%. The tumor response rate at 6 months was 54% (complete response, 21%; partial, 32%). The median PFS was 7.4 months (95% CI, 4.8‐not reached [NR]). The median bone‐PFS was 16 months (95% CI, 7.3‐NR). There were no grade 3/4 adverse events.

          Conclusions

          Ra‐223 with hormonal therapy showed possible efficacy in HR+ bone‐dominant breast cancer metastasis, and adverse events were tolerable. We plan to further investigate the clinical application of Ra‐223 in these patients. (NCT02366130).

          Abstract

          Radium‐223 dichloride is a targeted alpha therapy with localized cytotoxicity for bone metastasis.Our phase II trial which tested radium‐223 dichloride combined with hormonal therapy provided a high disease control with minimum toxicity in patients with hormone receptor‐positive, bone‐dominant metastatic breast cancer.

          Related collections

          Most cited references18

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors.

          The purpose of this article is to review the status and limitations of anatomic tumor response metrics including the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST), and RECIST 1.1. This article also reviews qualitative and quantitative approaches to metabolic tumor response assessment with (18)F-FDG PET and proposes a draft framework for PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), version 1.0. PubMed searches, including searches for the terms RECIST, positron, WHO, FDG, cancer (including specific types), treatment response, region of interest, and derivative references, were performed. Abstracts and articles judged most relevant to the goals of this report were reviewed with emphasis on limitations and strengths of the anatomic and PET approaches to treatment response assessment. On the basis of these data and the authors' experience, draft criteria were formulated for PET tumor response to treatment. Approximately 3,000 potentially relevant references were screened. Anatomic imaging alone using standard WHO, RECIST, and RECIST 1.1 criteria is widely applied but still has limitations in response assessments. For example, despite effective treatment, changes in tumor size can be minimal in tumors such as lymphomas, sarcoma, hepatomas, mesothelioma, and gastrointestinal stromal tumor. CT tumor density, contrast enhancement, or MRI characteristics appear more informative than size but are not yet routinely applied. RECIST criteria may show progression of tumor more slowly than WHO criteria. RECIST 1.1 criteria (assessing a maximum of 5 tumor foci, vs. 10 in RECIST) result in a higher complete response rate than the original RECIST criteria, at least in lymph nodes. Variability appears greater in assessing progression than in assessing response. Qualitative and quantitative approaches to (18)F-FDG PET response assessment have been applied and require a consistent PET methodology to allow quantitative assessments. Statistically significant changes in tumor standardized uptake value (SUV) occur in careful test-retest studies of high-SUV tumors, with a change of 20% in SUV of a region 1 cm or larger in diameter; however, medically relevant beneficial changes are often associated with a 30% or greater decline. The more extensive the therapy, the greater the decline in SUV with most effective treatments. Important components of the proposed PERCIST criteria include assessing normal reference tissue values in a 3-cm-diameter region of interest in the liver, using a consistent PET protocol, using a fixed small region of interest about 1 cm(3) in volume (1.2-cm diameter) in the most active region of metabolically active tumors to minimize statistical variability, assessing tumor size, treating SUV lean measurements in the 1 (up to 5 optional) most metabolically active tumor focus as a continuous variable, requiring a 30% decline in SUV for "response," and deferring to RECIST 1.1 in cases that do not have (18)F-FDG avidity or are technically unsuitable. Criteria to define progression of tumor-absent new lesions are uncertain but are proposed. Anatomic imaging alone using standard WHO, RECIST, and RECIST 1.1 criteria have limitations, particularly in assessing the activity of newer cancer therapies that stabilize disease, whereas (18)F-FDG PET appears particularly valuable in such cases. The proposed PERCIST 1.0 criteria should serve as a starting point for use in clinical trials and in structured quantitative clinical reporting. Undoubtedly, subsequent revisions and enhancements will be required as validation studies are undertaken in varying diseases and treatments.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Circulating tumor cells versus imaging--predicting overall survival in metastatic breast cancer.

            The presence of >or=5 circulating tumor cells (CTC) in 7.5 mL blood from patients with measurable metastatic breast cancer before and/or after initiation of therapy is associated with shorter progression-free and overall survival. In this report, we compared the use of CTCs to radiology for prediction of overall survival. One hundred thirty-eight metastatic breast cancer patients had imaging studies done before and a median of 10 weeks after the initiation of therapy. All scans were centrally reviewed by two independent radiologists using WHO criteria to determine radiologic response. CTC counts were determined approximately 4 weeks after initiation of therapy. Specimens were analyzed at one of seven laboratories and reviewed by a central laboratory. Interreader variability for radiologic responses and CTC counts were 15.2% and 0.7%, respectively. The median overall survival of 13 (9%) patients with radiologic nonprogression and >or=5 CTCs was significantly shorter than that of the 83 (60%) patients with radiologic nonprogression and or=5 CTCs that showed progression by radiology (19.9 versus 6.4 months; P=0.0039). Assessment of CTCs is an earlier, more reproducible indication of disease status than current imaging methods. CTCs may be a superior surrogate end point, as they are highly reproducible and correlate better with overall survival than do changes determined by traditional radiology.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Circulating Tumor Cells in Breast Cancer Patients Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Meta-analysis.

              We conducted a meta-analysis in nonmetastatic breast cancer patients treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) to assess the clinical validity of circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection as a prognostic marker.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nueno@mdanderson.org
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                18 December 2019
                February 2020
                : 9
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v9.3 )
                : 1025-1032
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Department of Breast Medical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
                [ 2 ] Department of Hematopathology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
                [ 3 ] Department of Breast Surgical Oncology The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
                [ 4 ] Department of Biostatistics The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
                [ 5 ] Department of Nuclear Medicine The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Naoto T. Ueno, Section of Translational Breast Cancer Research, Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 1354, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

                Email: nueno@ 123456mdanderson.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0166-7275
                Article
                CAM42780
                10.1002/cam4.2780
                6997080
                31849202
                cb7086ff-2663-4935-ab1a-edf778ba7b6c
                © 2019 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 17 October 2019
                : 22 November 2019
                : 02 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 8, Words: 4919
                Funding
                Funded by: Bayer AG
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health
                Award ID: P30CA016672
                Categories
                Original Research
                Clinical Cancer Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                February 2020
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:5.7.5 mode:remove_FC converted:03.02.2020

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                alphatherapy,bone metastasis,breast cancer,hormonal therapy,hormone receptor‐positive,radium‐223 dichloride

                Comments

                Comment on this article