14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Call for Papers: Green Renal Replacement Therapy: Caring for the Environment

      Submit here before July 31, 2024

      About Blood Purification: 3.0 Impact Factor I 5.6 CiteScore I 0.83 Scimago Journal & Country Rank (SJR)

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Role of Dialysis Sodium Gradient on Intradialytic Hypertension: An Observational Study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction: The causes of intradialytic hypertension (IDHyper) are not well understood and this condition can complicate the clinical management of hemodialysis (HD) patients. Aim: To evaluate the potential role of intradialytic sodium gradient (NaG) on blood pressure values and IDHyper during HD. Patients and Methods: 206 prevalent HD patients on 3 times weekly HD treatment for at least 6 months (dialytic vintage 6-240 months) followed at our institution were studied. Mean age was 68 ± 14 years, 129 were men. For 2 consecutive months (24 HD sessions) after the start of observation, the following variables were evaluated in predialysis after the long interdialysis interval: pre-HD plasma sodium (pNa, mmol/l) and potassium (pK, mmol/l) concentrations (mean value of 8 determinations), pre- and post-HD systolic (SBP, mm Hg) and diastolic (DBP, mm Hg) blood pressure, dry body weight (dBW, kg), interdialytic weight gain (IDWG, kg), ultrafiltration rate (UFR, ml/kg/h), dialysis dose (Kt/V), protein catabolic rate (PCRn, g/kg/day), hemoglobin (Hb, g/dl). SBP, DBP, IDWG, UFR are the mean values of the 24 HD sessions. 76% of patients were on antihypertensive therapy, 171 patients were on bicarbonate HD, and 35 on HDF. Dialysate Na concentration was set at 140 mmol/l in all patients. Duration of HD and the blood and dialysate flow rate were kept constant during observation. Statistical Analysis: Data are expressed as mean ± SD; linear and multiple regression analysis and t test for unpaired data were employed. Significant differences were defined as p < 0.05. Results: Pre-HD pNa was 138.1 ± 2.3 mmol/l, pK 5.0 ± 0.4 mmol/l, dBW 67 ± 14 kg, IDWG 2.9 ± 0.8 kg, UFR 11.2 ± 3.7 ml/kg/h, Kt/V 1.43 ± 0.18, PCRn 1.13 ± 0.17 g/kg/day, and Hb 11.2 ± 0.8 g/dl. Pre- and post-HD SBP values were 139 ± 13 and 134 ± 12 mm Hg (p < 0.0001); pre- and post-HD DBP did not change significantly. A dialysis Na gradient (NaG) (dialysate Na - pre-HD pNa) was calculated, as well as the delta of SBP (ΔSBP) (post-HD SBP - pre-HD SBP). IDHyper was defined as ΔSBP >0. A significant direct correlation was found between NaG and ΔSBP (p < 0.0001) and multiple regression analysis with ΔSBP as dependent variable confirmed the strong correlation with NaG (p < 0.00001). According to ΔSBP behavior, 171 patients (83%) had a decrease or no change in post-HD SBP (group 1; no IDHyper); 35 patients (17%) increased their post-HD SBP (group 2; IDHyper). NaG values were significantly greater in patients in group 2 (group 1: 1.5 ± 2.2 vs. group 2: 3.3 ± 2.5, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: This study shows that the intradialytic ΔSBP is independently and strongly associated with the dialytic NaG. The more positive the NaG (net intradialytic Na gain), the more positive the ΔSBP and IDHyper.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Hemodialysis-associated hypotension as an independent risk factor for two-year mortality in hemodialysis patients.

          The relationship between blood pressure (BP) and mortality in hemodialysis patients has remained controversial. Some studies suggested that a lower pre- or postdialysis BP was associated with excess mortality, while others showed poorer outcome in patients with uncontrolled hypertension. We conducted a multicenter prospective cohort study to evaluate the impact of hemodialysis-associated hypotension on mortality. We recruited 1244 patients (685 males; mean age, 60 +/- 13 years) who underwent hemodialysis in 28 units during the two-year study period beginning in December 1999. Pre-, intra-, and postdialysis BP, and BP upon standing soon after hemodialysis, were measured in all patients at entry. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the effect on mortality of pre-, intra-, and postdialysis BP, a fall in BP during hemodialysis, and a fall in BP upon standing soon after hemodialysis. During the study period, 149 patients died. Logistic models identified the lowest intradialysis systolic blood pressure (SBP) and degree of fall in SBP upon standing soon after hemodialysis as significant factors affecting mortality, but not pre- or postdialysis SBP and diastolic BP. The adjusted odds ratio for death was 0.79 (95% CI 0.64-0.98) when the lowest intradialysis SBP was analyzed in increments of 20 mm Hg, and was 0.82 (95% CI 0.67-0.98) when the fall in SBP upon standing soon after hemodialysis was analyzed in increments of 10 mm Hg. These results suggest that intradialysis hypotension and orthostatic hypotension after hemodialysis are significant and independent factors affecting mortality in hemodialysis patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Blood pressure and long-term mortality in United States hemodialysis patients: USRDS Waves 3 and 4 Study.

            The long-term prognostic associations of pre- and post-dialysis blood pressures, interdialytic weight gain, and antihypertensive use in hemodialysis patients are unclear. The United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Waves 3 and 4 Study, a randomly generated sample of 11,142 subjects receiving hemodialysis on December 31, 1993, was examined, with vital status followed until May 2000. Pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure values, interdialytic weight gain and number of antihypertensives averaged 151.8/79.7, 137.0/74, 3.6% and 0.76, respectively. Prognostic discrimination was maximized by considering pre- and post-systolic and diastolic blood pressure values simultaneously, in a pattern suggesting that wide pulse pressures were associated with mortality (P < 0.0001). Comorbidity adjustment markedly affected associations, with low pre-dialysis diastolic (P < 0.05), low post-dialysis dialysis diastolic pressure (P < 0.05), high post-dialysis dialysis systolic pressure (P < 0.05), and high interdialytic weight gains (P = 0.005) associated with mortality. Each class of antihypertensive drug, except angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitors, was associated with lower mortality in unadjusted models, an effect most pronounced for beta-blockers (hazards ratio 0.72, 95% CI 0.66 to 0.79, P < 0.0001). Comorbidity adjustment eliminated survival associations for each antihypertensive class except beta-blockers. Pre- and post-dialysis blood pressure values have independent associations with mortality, in a way that implicates wide pulse pressures. Much of the adverse prognosis of wide pulse pressures probably reflects older age and cardiovascular comorbidity. Large interdialytic weight gains are associated with shorter survival when comorbidity is taken into account. Beta-blocker use shows a robust association with survival, and may be protective.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Association of blood pressure increases during hemodialysis with 2-year mortality in incident hemodialysis patients: a secondary analysis of the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave 2 Study.

              Intradialytic increases in blood pressure (BP) can complicate the management of hypertension in hemodialysis (HD) patients. However, the long-term consequences are uncertain. Thus, we sought to determine whether BP increases during HD were associated with greater 2-year mortality in incident HD patients. Secondary analysis of a prospective dialysis cohort. Incident HD patients in the Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave 2 Study. Changes in systolic BP (SBP) during HD (ie, postdialysis SBP -- predialysis SBP), averaged from 3 HD sessions before enrollment. Time to 2-year all-cause mortality. Cox regression was used to model hazard ratios for mortality associated with changes in SBP during HD while adjusting for demographics, comorbid conditions, interdialytic weight gain, laboratory variables, and antihypertensive agents. Of 1,748 patients, 12.2% showed greater than 10-mm Hg increases in SBP during HD. In adjusted analyses, every 10-mm Hg increase in SBP during HD was associated independently with a 6% increased hazard of death (hazard ratio, 1.06; 95% confidence interval, 1.01 to 1.11). When also adjusted for diastolic BP and postdialysis SBP, the adjusted hazard of death associated with increasing SBP during HD remained significant (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.05 to 1.21 per 10-mm Hg increase in SBP during HD). However, in analyses adjusted for predialysis SBP, there was a significant interaction between change in SBP and predialysis SBP. In analyses stratified by predialysis SBP, trends for increased mortality associated with increasing SBP during dialysis were present in patients with predialysis SBP less than 160 mm Hg. However, this relationship was significant only in patients with predialysis SBP less than 120 mm Hg. Secondary analysis with a limited number of baseline BP measurements and limited information about dialysis prescription. Increasing SBP by more than 10 mm Hg during HD occurs in approximately 10% of incident patients, and although increasing SBP during HD was associated with decreased 2-year survival, these findings were limited to patients with predialysis SBP less than 120 mm Hg.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                AJN
                Am J Nephrol
                10.1159/issn.0250-8095
                American Journal of Nephrology
                S. Karger AG
                0250-8095
                1421-9670
                2013
                November 2013
                05 November 2013
                : 38
                : 5
                : 413-419
                Affiliations
                Operative Unit of Nephrology, AO Spedali Civili di Brescia, and University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
                Author notes
                *Ezio Movilli, MD, Operative Unit of Nephrology, AO Spedali Civili di Brescia, University of Brescia, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, IT-25123 Brescia (Italy), E-Mail eziomov@libero.it
                Article
                355974 Am J Nephrol 2013;38:413-419
                10.1159/000355974
                24216674
                cb885da9-f4c6-43f8-9d88-31c47f2830a9
                © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel

                Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

                History
                : 07 August 2013
                : 18 September 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 5, Tables: 3, Pages: 7
                Categories
                Original Report: Patient-Oriented, Translational Research

                Cardiovascular Medicine,Nephrology
                Hemodialysis,Hypertension,Sodium gradient
                Cardiovascular Medicine, Nephrology
                Hemodialysis, Hypertension, Sodium gradient

                Comments

                Comment on this article