1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Gilding-the-Lily Effect: Exploratory Behavior Energized by Curiosity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The widespread metaphor “to gild the lily” suggests that people usually engage in superfluous behaviors. Understanding the cognitive mechanism underlying superfluous behaviors helps individuals to reduce possible waste and even disasters incurred by unnecessary actions. Here, we assumed that curiosity for new information partly pushes people to make needless efforts. This hypothesis was tested through three experiments. In three experiments, we found that when participants knew that expending more efforts than task requirements brought no better results, they still exerted various exploratory activities to fulfill curiosity. These results imply that the impulsion to satisfy the desire for information could partly drive individuals to indulge in unnecessary activities over mission demands. Present research improves the comprehension of irrational superfluous behavior and provides directions to reduce loss and waste caused by gilding the lily.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The trouble with overconfidence.

          The authors present a reconciliation of 3 distinct ways in which the research literature has defined overconfidence: (a) overestimation of one's actual performance, (b) overplacement of one's performance relative to others, and (c) excessive precision in one's beliefs. Experimental evidence shows that reversals of the first 2 (apparent underconfidence), when they occur, tend to be on different types of tasks. On difficult tasks, people overestimate their actual performances but also mistakenly believe that they are worse than others; on easy tasks, people underestimate their actual performances but mistakenly believe they are better than others. The authors offer a straightforward theory that can explain these inconsistencies. Overprecision appears to be more persistent than either of the other 2 types of overconfidence, but its presence reduces the magnitude of both overestimation and overplacement.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                03 July 2020
                2020
                : 11
                : 1381
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University , Hangzhou, China
                [2] 2Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University , Jinhua, China
                Author notes

                Edited by: Guomei Zhou, Sun Yat-sen University, China

                Reviewed by: Jordan Litman, University of Maine at Machias, United States; Hong Li, Shenzhen University, China

                *Correspondence: Jifan Zhou, jifanzhou@ 123456zju.edu.cn

                This article was submitted to Cognition, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01381
                7350549
                cb8d1cc3-54c4-404c-a576-0dbffe23c633
                Copyright © 2020 Shen, Liu, Li, Zhou and Chen.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 06 December 2019
                : 25 May 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 45, Pages: 12, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China 10.13039/501100001809
                Award ID: No. 31871096,31600881
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                gild the lily,superfluous behavior,curiosity,interest,deprivation,exploration

                Comments

                Comment on this article