21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): An Abridged Explanation and Elaboration

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) were developed to address widespread deficiencies in the reporting of such studies. The REMARK checklist consists of 20 items to report for published tumor marker prognostic studies. A detailed paper was published explaining the rationale behind checklist items, providing positive examples and giving empirical evidence of the quality of reporting. REMARK provides a comprehensive overview to educate on good reporting and provide a valuable reference for the many issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing tumor marker studies and prognostic studies in medicine in general. Despite support for REMARK from major cancer journals, prognostic factor research studies remain poorly reported. To encourage dissemination and uptake of REMARK, we have produced this considerably abridged version of the detailed explanatory manuscript, which may also serve as a brief guide to key issues for investigators planning tumor marker prognostic studies. To summarize the current situation, more recent papers investigating the quality of reporting and related reporting guidelines are cited, but otherwise the literature is not updated. Another important impetus for this paper is that it serves as a basis for literal translations into other languages. Translations will help to bring key information to a larger audience world-wide. Many more details can be found in the original paper.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK): Explanation and Elaboration

          The REMARK “elaboration and explanation” guideline, by Doug Altman and colleagues, provides a detailed reference for authors on important issues to consider when designing, conducting, and analyzing tumor marker prognostic studies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Dangers of using "optimal" cutpoints in the evaluation of prognostic factors.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Prognosis and prognostic research: validating a prognostic model.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Natl Cancer Inst
                J. Natl. Cancer Inst
                jnci
                JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
                Oxford University Press
                0027-8874
                1460-2105
                August 2018
                04 June 2018
                04 June 2018
                : 110
                : 8
                : 803-811
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute for Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
                [2 ]Cancer Diagnosis Program and Biometric Research Program, Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
                [3 ]Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
                Author notes

                See the Notes section for the full list of authors’ affiliations.

                Correspondence to: Prof. Dr. Willli Sauerbrei, Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Stefan-Meier-Str. 26, 79104 Freiburg, Germany (e-mail: wfs@ 123456imbi.uni-freiburg.de ).
                Article
                djy088
                10.1093/jnci/djy088
                6093349
                29873743
                cb96406a-6f30-49a6-940d-16307c7e924a
                © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com

                History
                : 21 November 2017
                : 16 March 2018
                : 17 April 2018
                Page count
                Pages: 9
                Funding
                Funded by: Cancer Research UK 10.13039/501100000289
                Award ID: C5529
                Categories
                Commentary

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                Oncology & Radiotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article