28
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      An automatic phase picker for local and teleseismic events

      1 , 1
      Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
      Seismological Society of America (SSA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          An automatic detection algorithm has been developed which is capable of time P-phase arrivals of both local and teleseismic earthquakes, but rejects noise bursts and transient events. For each signal trace, the envelope function is calculated and passed through a nonlinear amplifier. The resulting signal is then subjected to a statistical analysis to yield arrival time, first motion, and a measure of reliability to be placed on the P-arrival pick. An incorporated dynamic threshold lets the algorithm become very sensitive; thus, even weak signals are timed precisely. During an extended performance evaluation on a data set comprising 789 P phases of local events and 1857 P phases of teleseismic events picked by an analyst, the automatic picker selected 66 per cent of the local phases and 90 per cent of the teleseismic phases. The accuracy of the automatic picks was “ideal” (i.e., could not be improved by the analyst) for 60 per cent of the local events and 63 per cent of the teleseismic events.

          Related collections

          Most cited references9

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Automatic phase pickers: Their present use and future prospects

          Automatic phase-picking algorithms are designed to detect a seismic signal on a single trace and to time the arrival of the signal precisely. Because of the requirement for precise timing, a phase-picking algorithm is inherently less sensitive than one designed only to detect the presence of a signal, but still can approach the performance of a skilled analyst. A typical algorithm filters the input data and then generates a function characterizing the seismic time series. This function may be as simple as the absolute value of the series, or it may be quite complex. Event detection is accomplished by comparing the function or its short-term average (STA) with a threshold value (THR), which is commonly some multiple of a long-term average (LTA) of a characteristic function. If the STA exceeds THR, a trigger is declared. If the event passes simple criteria, it is reported. Sensitivity, expected timing error, false-trigger rate, and false-report rate are interrelated measures of performance controlled by choice of the characteristic function and several operating parameters. At present, computational power limits most systems to one-pass, time-domain algorithms. Rapidly advancing semi-conductor technology, however, will make possible much more powerful multi-pass approaches incorporating frequency-domain detection and pseudo-offline timing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A deep low-velocity body under the Yellowstone caldera, Wyoming: Delineation using teleseismic P-wave residuals and tectonic interpretation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              An automatic seismic signal detection algorithm based on the Walsh transform

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
                Seismological Society of America (SSA)
                1943-3573
                0037-1106
                August 1987
                August 01 1987
                August 01 1987
                August 1987
                August 01 1987
                August 01 1987
                : 77
                : 4
                : 1437-1445
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Institute of Geophysics Swiss Federal Institute of Technology ETH-Hoenggerberg 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
                Article
                10.1785/BSSA0770041437
                cb9850d0-c4f4-44dd-a2a4-201c973ee0a0
                © 1987
                History

                Molecular medicine,Neurosciences
                Molecular medicine, Neurosciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article