20
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      “I Want It All, and I Want It Now”: Lifetime Prevalence and Reasons for Using and Abstaining from Controlled Performance and Appearance Enhancing Substances (PAES) among Young Exercisers and Amateur Athletes in Five European Countries

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Doping use in recreational sports is an emerging issue that has received limited attention so far in the psychological literature. The present study assessed the lifetime prevalence of controlled performance and appearance enhancing substances (PAES), and used behavioral reasoning theory to identify the reasons for using and for avoiding using controlled PAES in young exercisers across five European countries, in the context of the “SAFE YOU” Project. Participants were 915 young amateur athletes and exercisers ( M = 21.62; SD = 2.62) from Cyprus, Germany, Greece, Italy, and UK who completed an anonymous questionnaire that included measures of self-reported use of controlled PAES, as well as reasons for using and not using controlled PAES. The results of the descriptive analyses demonstrated that almost one out five exercisers in the sample had a previous experience with controlled PAES. Higher prevalence rates were found in Greece and Cyprus and lower in Italy. The most frequently reported reasons for using controlled PAES included achieving the desired results faster; pushing the self to the (physical) limits; and recovering faster after exercise/training. Furthermore, the most frequently reported reasons for not using controlled PAES involved worry about any possible adverse health effects; not feeling the need for using them; and wanting to see what can be achieved naturally without using any controlled PAES. The findings of the present study indicate that the use of controlled PAES is fast becoming a crisis in amateur sports and exercise settings and highlight the need for preventive action and concerted anti-doping education efforts.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Long-term health benefits of physical activity – a systematic review of longitudinal studies

          Background The treatment of noncommunicable diseases (NCD), like coronary heart disease or type 2 diabetes mellitus, causes rising costs for the health system. Physical activity is supposed to reduce the risk for these diseases. Results of cross-sectional studies showed that physical activity is associated with better health, and that physical activity could prevent the development of these diseases. The purpose of this review is to summarize existing evidence for the long-term (>5 years) relationship between physical activity and weight gain, obesity, coronary heart disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, Alzheimer’s disease and dementia. Methods Fifteen longitudinal studies with at least 5-year follow up times and a total of 288,724 subjects (>500 participants in each study), aged between 18 and 85 years, were identified using digital databases. Only studies published in English, about healthy adults at baseline, intentional physical activity and the listed NCDs were included. Results The results of these studies show that physical activity appears to have a positive long-term influence on all selected diseases. Conclusions This review revealed a paucity of long-term studies on the relationship between physical activity and the incidence of NCD.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A hot/cool-system analysis of delay of gratification: dynamics of willpower.

            A 2-system framework is proposed for understanding the processes that enable--and undermine--self-control or "willpower" as exemplified in the delay of gratification paradigm. A cool, cognitive "know" system and a hot, emotional "go" system are postulated. The cool system is cognitive, emotionally neutral, contemplative, flexible, integrated, coherent, spatiotemporal, slow, episodic, and strategic. It is the seat of self-regulation and self-control. The hot system is the basis of emotionality, fears as well as passions--impulsive and reflexive--initially controlled by innate releasing stimuli (and, thus, literally under "stimulus control"): it is fundamental for emotional (classical) conditioning and undermines efforts at self-control. The balance between the hot and cool systems is determined by stress, developmental level, and the individual's self-regulatory dynamics. The interactions between these systems allow explanation of findings on willpower from 3 decades of research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Behavioral reasoning theory: Identifying new linkages underlying intentions and behavior

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Psychol
                Front Psychol
                Front. Psychol.
                Frontiers in Psychology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-1078
                22 May 2017
                2017
                : 8
                : 717
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Psychology, Sociology and Politics, Sheffield Hallam University Sheffield, UK
                [2] 2Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki, Greece
                [3] 3Department of Sport and Exercise Psychology, University of Potsdam Potsdam, Germany
                [4] 4School of Education, Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, Kingston University and St George’s University of London London, UK
                [5] 5Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome “Foro Italico” Rome, Italy
                [6] 6Cyprus Sport Organization Nicosia, Cyprus
                [7] 7School of Life Sciences, Engineering and Computing, Faculty of Science, Engineering and Computing, Kingston University London, UK
                Author notes

                Edited by: Sergio Machado, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

                Reviewed by: John L. Perry, University of Hull, UK; Sandro Legey Passos De Souza, Universidade Veiga de Almeida, Brazil; Aldair J. Oliveira, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

                *Correspondence: Vassilis Barkoukis, bark@ 123456phed.auth.gr

                These authors have contributed equally to this work.

                This article was submitted to Movement Science and Sport Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology

                Article
                10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00717
                5438994
                28588518
                cbbf921a-f478-467b-b9d9-e559cedd6b3e
                Copyright © 2017 Lazuras, Barkoukis, Loukovitis, Brand, Hudson, Mallia, Michaelides, Muzi, Petróczi and Zelli.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 30 December 2016
                : 21 April 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 40, Pages: 9, Words: 0
                Funding
                Funded by: European Commission 10.13039/501100000780
                Categories
                Psychology
                Original Research

                Clinical Psychology & Psychiatry
                doping,behavioral reasoning,exercise,fitness,recreational sport,young adults

                Comments

                Comment on this article