18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Role of membranes in the activities of antimicrobial cationic peptides

      ,
      FEMS Microbiology Letters
      Wiley

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Cationic amphiphilic peptides that are found throughout nature have very broad-spectrum activities against microbes. The initial sites of interaction are with microbial membranes. Although dogma suggests that their lethal action involves disruption of the cytoplasmic membranes, a number of cationic peptides can traverse intact membranes to interact with internal targets.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The role of cationic antimicrobial peptides in innate host defences.

          Cationic antimicrobial peptides are found in all living species. A single animal can contain >24 different antimicrobial peptides, which fall into four structural classes. These peptides are produced in large quantities at sites of infection and/or inflammation and can have broad-spectrum antibacterial, antifungal, antiviral, antiprotozoan and antisepsis properties. In addition, they interact directly with host cells to modulate the inflammatory process and innate defences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Peptide antibiotics and their role in innate immunity.

            H. Boman (1995)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mechanism of interaction of different classes of cationic antimicrobial peptides with planar bilayers and with the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli.

              Antimicrobial cationic peptides are prevalent throughout nature as part of the intrinsic defenses of most organisms, and have been proposed as a blueprint for the design of novel antimicrobial agents. They are known to interact with membranes, and it has been frequently proposed that this represents their antibacterial target. To see if this was a general mechanism of action, we studied the interaction, with model membranes and the cytoplasmic membrane of Escherichia coli, of 12 peptides representing all 4 structural classes of antimicrobial peptides. Planar lipid bilayer studies indicated that there was considerable variance in the interactions of the peptides with model phospholipid membranes, but generally both high concentrations of peptide and high transmembrane voltages (usually -180 mV) were required to observe conductance events (channels). The channels observed for most peptides varied widely in magnitude and duration. An assay was developed to measure the interaction with the Escherichia coli cytoplasmic membrane employing the membrane potential sensitive dye 3,5-dipropylthiacarbocyanine in the outer membrane barrier-defective E. coli strain DC2. It was demonstrated that individual peptides varied widely in their ability to depolarize the cytoplasmic membrane potential of E. coli, with certain peptides such as the loop peptide bactenecin and the alpha-helical peptide CP26 being unable to cause depolarization at the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC), and others like gramicidin S causing maximal depolarization below the MIC. We discuss the mechanism of interaction with the cytoplasmic membrane in terms of the model of Matsuzaki et al. [(1998) Biochemistry 37, 15144-15153] and the possibility that the cytoplasmic membrane is not the target for some or even most cationic antimicrobial peptides.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                FML
                FEMS Microbiology Letters
                Wiley
                03781097
                15746968
                January 2002
                January 2002
                : 206
                : 2
                : 143-149
                Article
                10.1111/j.1574-6968.2002.tb11000.x
                11814654
                cbc1df47-e4c2-45c6-8dc3-4c0087a2cbef
                © 2002
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article