6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Reflexiones sobre el primer caso de triple filiación desde el nacimiento en Argentina. Por qué es importante establecer diferencias con la adopción y la subrogación del embarazo Translated title: Reflexions sobre el primer cas de triple filiació des del naixement a l'Argentina. Per què és important establir diferències amb l'adopció i la subrogació de l'embaràs Translated title: Reflections on the first case of triple filiation from birth in Argentina. Why it is important to establish differences between adoption and surrogacy of pregnancy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Resumen El presente artículo tiene el propósito de reflexionar sobre un reciente caso de triple filiación desde el nacimiento en Argentina que constituye una nueva forma de coparentalidad. Para ello, en primer lugar, realizo una descripción de los hechos y la sentencia. En segundo lugar, refiero que los feminismos y los movimientos por la diversidad han colaborado en comprensiones y prácticas más respetuosas y dinámicas de la institución familiar en clara oposición al neoconservadurismo. Luego planteo que la defensa de dicho dinamismo familiar fundado no debiera llevarnos a defender cualquier camino para la consecución del proyecto familiar, puntualmente en el caso de varones solos o en pareja. Por ello, diferencio los modos que usualmente tienen para alcanzar la paternidad con el objetivo de mostrar cómo la coparentalidad y la adopción son moralmente aceptables mientras que la subrogación del embarazo es cuestionable éticamente.

          Translated abstract

          Resum El present article té el propòsit de reflexionar sobre un recent cas de triple filiació des del naixement a l'Argentina que constitueix una nova forma de coparentalitat. Per a això, en primer lloc, realitzo una descripció dels fets i la sentència. En segon lloc, refereixo que els feminismes i els moviments per la diversitat han col·laborat en comprensions i pràctiques més respectuoses i dinàmiques de la institució familiar en clara oposició al neoconservadurisme. Després plantejo que la defensa d'aquest dinamisme familiar fundat no hagués de portar-nos a defensar qualsevol camí per a la consecució del projecte familiar, puntualment en el cas d'homes sols o en parella. Per això, diferencio les maneres que usualment tenen per a aconseguir la paternitat amb l'objectiu de mostrar com la coparentalitat i l'adopció són moralment acceptables mentre que la subrogació de l'embaràs és qüestionable èticament.

          Translated abstract

          Abstract The purpose of this article is to analyze on a recent case of triple filiation from birth in Argentina, which constitutes a new form of co-parenting. In order to do so, firstly, I describe the facts and the judicial sentence. Secondly, I explain that feminisms and diversity movements have collaborated in more respectful and dynamic understandings and practices of the family institution in clear opposition to neoconservatism. Then I argue that the defense of such family dynamism should not lead us to defend any path for the achievement of the family project, especially in the case of single men or couples. Therefore, I differentiate the ways they usually have to achieve parenthood in order to show how co-parenting and adoption are morally acceptable while pregnancy surrogacy is ethically questionable.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Reactive politicization and religious dissidence: the political mutations of the religious

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Troublesome reproduction: surrogacy under scrutiny

            In recent years, the emergence of transnational commercial surrogacy arrangements has prompted consideration of how and whether it is possible to bridge claims for reproductive rights from involuntarily childless couples and singles, many of whom historically have been excluded from reproduction, with the rights and well-being of the reproductive assisters. In this article, I suggest that a fruitful starting point for a conversation on how to tackle such a challenge is to examine the way in which surrogacy is conceptualized. Thus, I examine how scholars have queried surrogacy, asking how different conceptualizations of who this reproductive phenomenon concerns have led to the formulations of different types of ‘troubles’ of surrogacy. I delineate three different conceptualizations of surrogacy. Firstly, how surrogacy as a way to make parents has troubled scholars because of the conflation of reproduction with consumption, thereby making reproduction a matter of financial resource. Secondly, the trouble emerging when surrogacy is conceptualized as baby-making relates to how surrogacy turns babies and bodies into commodities. Thirdly, surrogacy understood as a phenomenon that concerns the women gestating and birthing the children has brought attention to issues of exploitation. These different formulations of trouble point towards tensions in the literature, while also offering reminders that surrogacy is not one thing alone; a finding that provides an opening for new forms of reproductive justice. This brings me to propose a rethinking of the notion of ‘reproductive assistance’, arguing in favour of moving away from substitution and transaction towards a relational being-together.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Book: not found

              Documento sobre gestación por sustitución

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                bioetica
                Revista de Bioética y Derecho
                Rev. Bioética y Derecho
                Observatori de Bioètica i Dret - Cátedra UNESCO de Bioética (Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain )
                1886-5887
                2022
                : 56
                : 93-105
                Affiliations
                [1] orgnameUniversidad Nacional de San Martín, UNSAM Argentina
                [2] orgnameFacultad Latinoamericana de Ciencias Sociales, FLACSO Argentina
                Article
                S1886-58872022000300093 S1886-5887(22)00005600093
                10.1344/rbd2022.56.40690
                cbe783c5-e7b1-45e6-a644-98975525b267

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

                History
                : 28 June 2022
                : 15 June 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 21, Pages: 13
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Dossier sobre gestación por sustitución

                autonomía,triple filiació des del naixement a l'Argentina,coparentalitat,gestació subrogada,autonomia,triple filiation from birth in Argentina,coparenting,surrogate pregnancy,autonomy,triple filiación desde el nacimiento en Argentina,coparentalidad,gestación subrogada

                Comments

                Comment on this article