993
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    4
    shares

      Celebrating 65 years of The Computer Journal - free-to-read perspectives - bcs.org/tcj65

      scite_
       
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Conference Proceedings: found
      Is Open Access

      The Art of Questioning Lethal Vision: Mosse’s Infra and Militarized Machine Vision

      proceedings-article
      1
      Politics of the Machines - Art and After (EVA Copenhagen)
      Digital arts and culture
      15 - 17 May 2018
      Machine vision, Art Photography, Security
      Bookmark

            Abstract

            Military techno-vision is decidedly opaque. We – the public in whose name they are developed and deployed – are never quite allowed to scrutinize how exactly it operates, or what kind of work it performs. For a long time, military techno-vision was related to the optical qualities of the human eye. It was either about enhancing the natural human eye, seeing further, seeing in less light, seeing from different locations, or about mimicking the human eye, creating spatial awareness and navigation capabilities from the singular point of the eye/camera. Today, increasingly, militarized techno-vision is not merely about the production but also the interpretation of images, about the mind rather than the eye, to use the anthropomorphic language that dominates high-tech discourse. This shift from optics to procession, vision or understanding is related to the development of precision optics and the resulting flood of images that threatens to overwhelm the security bureaucracies seeking to optimize lethal vision. The contemporary problem, thus, is not overcoming invisibility but rather how to efficiently manage a flood of opaque images. The solution, proposed by militaries as simultaneously benign and efficient, is to delegate image interpretation to machines. In this paper, I ask how we can scrutinize and interrogate the agency of such machine vision systems when we as a public are rarely granted access to the operations they perform. First, I briefly explore current machine vision technologies, and the technological projects that have identified their blind spots. Second, I look to artistic image production as a means to help think about militarized vision and pictorial agency.

            Content

            Author and article information

            Contributors
            Conference
            May 2018
            May 2018
            : 1-7
            Affiliations
            [1 ] International Politics

            University of Tampere

            Tampere, Finland
            Article
            10.14236/ewic/EVAC18.29
            cbfc7c3d-eaef-4477-8865-9e2cb60345cd
            © Saugmann. Published by BCS Learning and Development Ltd. Proceedings of EVA Copenhagen 2018, Denmark

            This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

            Politics of the Machines - Art and After
            EVA Copenhagen
            7
            Aalborg University, Copenhagen, Denmark
            15 - 17 May 2018
            Electronic Workshops in Computing (eWiC)
            Digital arts and culture
            History
            Product

            1477-9358 BCS Learning & Development

            Self URI (article page): https://www.scienceopen.com/hosted-document?doi=10.14236/ewic/EVAC18.29
            Self URI (journal page): https://ewic.bcs.org/
            Categories
            Electronic Workshops in Computing

            Applied computer science,Computer science,Security & Cryptology,Graphics & Multimedia design,General computer science,Human-computer-interaction
            Art Photography,Machine vision,Security

            References

            1. 2017 Bringing AI to the fight against ISIS Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists https://thebulletin.org/project-maven-brings-ai-fight- against-isis11374 4 5 18

            2. 2007 Vigilant Visualities: The Watchful Politics of the War on Terror Security Dialogue 38 215 232

            3. 2015 Remediating Security. A semiotic framework for analyzing how video speaks security University of Copenhagen, Department of Political Science Copenhagen

            4. 2000 Remediation: understanding new media MIT Press Cambridge, Mass

            5. 2009 ImageNet: A large-scale hierarchical image database 2009 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition IEEE Miami, FL, USA 248 255

            6. Deputy Secretary of Defense 2017 Establishment of an Algorithmic Warfare Cross-Functional Team (Project Maven)

            7. 2011 The everywhere war The Geographical Journal 177 238 250

            8. 1991 Simians, Cyborgs, and Women. The Reinvention of Nature Free Association Books London

            9. 2017 To Handle Its Influx of Drone Footage, Military Should Teach AI to Watch TV. WIRED https://www.wired.com/story/the-military-should-teach-ai-to-watch-drone-footage/ 11 6 18

            10. Kodak 2005 KODAK AEROCHROME III Infrared Film 1443 https ://www.kodak.com/uploadedFiles/Corporate/Industrial_Materials.../ti2562.pdf 11 6 18

            11. 2015 Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Context arXiv:1405.0312v3

            12. 1994 The electronic eye: the rise of surveillance society University of Minnesota Press Minneapolis

            13. 2015 Deep Neural Networks are Easily Fooled: High Confidence Predictions for Unrecognizable Images Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, IEEE https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.1897

            14. Norwegian Police Security Service 2014 PST and Societal Security Presentation at Peace Research Institute Oslo 12 12 14

            15. 2017 Project Maven to Deploy Computer Algorithms to War Zone by Year’s End

            16. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE https ://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1254719/project-maven-to-deploy-computer-algorithms- to-war-zone-by-years-end/ 4 5 18

            17. 2017 Distinction and the Ethics of Violence: On the Legal Construction of Liminal Subjects and Spaces: Distinction and the Ethics of Violence Antipode 49 1385 1405 2014 I STILL SHOOT FILM istillshootfilm.org http://istillshootfilm.org/post/48700294601/richard-mosse-interview-kodak-aerochrome-in-the 6 27 18

            18. 2014 ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge arXiv:1409.0575 [cs]

            19. 2017 Video, algorithms, and security Security Dialogue 48 354–372

            20. 2009 Cinematic geopolitics Routledge London; New York

            21. 2011 Shocking pink. The Guardian http://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2011/ma y/28/richard-mosse-infrared-photos-congo 27 6 18

            22. 2016 The Sight of Migration: Governmentality, Visibility and Europe’s Contested Borders Global Society30445 464 The Economist 2016 From not working to neural networking. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/special-report/2016/06/25/from-not-working-to-neural- networking 4 5 18

            23. 2015 Show and Tell: A Neural Image Caption Generator arXiv:1411.4555v2

            24. 2014 A picture is worth a thousand (coherent) words: building a natural description of images Google AI Blog. https://ai.googleblog.com/2014/11/a-picture-is- worth-thousand-coherent.html 4 5 18 2014 Drone strikes, dingpolitik and beyond: Furthering the debate on materiality and security Security Dialogue45101 118

            Comments

            Comment on this article