37
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A survey of elderly diabetic patients attending a community clinic in Hong Kong

      , , , , ,
      Patient Education and Counseling
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          A cross-sectional survey was conducted on Chinese diabetic patients attending a community clinic in Hong Kong. A questionnaire, physical examination and blood tests were administered. Of 155 adults with diabetes mellitus recruited, the mean age was 63 years (SD 10.3), 77.4% were female and 41.9% illiterate. Half the patients achieved adequate knowledge scores. Knowledge was found to be associated with education level (OR 4.3, 95% CI 1.8, 10.0), longer disease duration (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4, 7.4) and complications (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.1, 0.8). No correlation was found between knowledge and attitude or practice. Attitude was found to be associated with practice (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0, 1.3) and male gender (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.1, 7.5); practice was associated with hypertension (0.5, 95% CI 0.2, 0.9). Older less educated Chinese diabetic patients can be educated about diabetes management, but knowledge does not always translate into practice.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Patient Education and Counseling
          Patient Education and Counseling
          Elsevier BV
          07383991
          March 1999
          March 1999
          : 36
          : 3
          : 259-270
          Article
          10.1016/S0738-3991(98)00106-2
          14528561
          cc1e212a-4a17-4b77-a655-1d2978d3abfb
          © 1999

          https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article