10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Efectividad de una intervención breve en la resiliencia, atención plena y empatía de profesionales de enfermería Translated title: Effectiveness of a brief intervention on the resilience, mindfulness and empathy of nursing professionals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          RESUMEN: Objetivos: Evaluar la eficacia de una intervención guiada basada en la reducción del estrés y compasión, sobre la resiliencia, desgaste por empatía y atención plena de profesionales sanitarios. Metodología: Estudio cuasiexperimental con grupo control e intervención combinada multimodal impartido en 3 sesiones. Grupo control (n = 23), grupo experimental (n = 23). Recogida de datos: se hicieron 4 observaciones y se utilizaron las herramientas Escala Breve de Resiliencia, Inventario Friburgo de Mindfulness, Inventario de Desgaste por Empatía y datos sobre el perfil laboral y vida personal de las profesionales. Para analizar la relación entre variables se utilizó un modelo lineal general, la pruebas de chi cuadrado o de Fisher y análisis de regresión. Resultados: No se encontró un efecto significativo de la intervención evaluada en la puntuación obtenida en atención plena, resiliencia o empatía. El grupo control obtuvo mayor puntuación en atención plena cuando se relacionó con la unidad de trabajo no covid y la ausencia de estresores personales F (1,21)=16,081 p=<0,01, ŋ2=0,434. El perfil empático normal sin riesgo, fue significativamente mayor en unidades no covid frente a las covid en la primera evaluación (70% vs 30%, p=0,002). El perfil de baja resiliencia en técnicos de cuidados auxiliares de enfermería, fue mayor durante la última evaluación (72,2% vs 27,8%, p=0,003), momento que coincidió con un mayor número de pacientes hospitalizados por covid. Conclusiones: Factores personales y laborales (categoría profesional, la unidad de trabajo y presión asistencial) tuvieron más influencia en el bienestar psicológico de los profesionales, que la intervención realizada.

          Translated abstract

          ABSTRACT: Objectives: Assess the efficacy of a guided intervention based on stress reduction and compassion, related to resilience and compassion fatigue of healthcare professionals. Methods: Quasi-experimental study with a control and intervention groups, combining a multimodal intervention delivered in 3 sessions. Control group (n = 23), experimental group (n = 23). Data collection: 4 observations were made using the Brief Resilience Scale, Freiburg Mindfulness Inventory, Compassion Fatigue Inventory and data on the professional profile and personal life. In order to analyze the relationship between variables, a general linear model, the chi-square or Fisher test, and regression analysis were used. Results: No significant effect of the evaluated intervention was found on the score obtained in mindfulness, resilience or empathy. The control group obtained a higher score in mindfulness when related to the non-covid work unit and the absence of personal stressors F(1.21)=16.081 p=<0.01, ŋ2=0.434. The normal empathic profile without risk was significantly higher in non-covid units compared to covid units in the first evaluation (70% vs 30%, p=0.002). The profile of low resilience in auxiliary nurses was higher during the last evaluation (72.2% vs 27.8%, p=0.003), a moment in which a greater number of patients were hospitalized with covid. Conclusions: A higher influences on professionals psychological wellbeing was present with personal and job related factors (professional category, work place and healthcare pressure) than the intervention carried out.

          Related collections

          Most cited references13

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Interventions to support the resilience and mental health of frontline health and social care professionals during and after a disease outbreak, epidemic or pandemic: a mixed methods systematic review

          Evidence from disease epidemics shows that healthcare workers are at risk of developing short- and long-term mental health problems. The World Health Organization (WHO) has warned about the potential negative impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the mental well-being of health and social care professionals. Symptoms of mental health problems commonly include depression, anxiety, stress, and additional cognitive and social problems; these can impact on function in the workplace. The mental health and resilience (ability to cope with the negative effects of stress) of frontline health and social care professionals ('frontline workers' in this review) could be supported during disease epidemics by workplace interventions, interventions to support basic daily needs, psychological support interventions, pharmacological interventions, or a combination of any or all of these.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Psychological interventions to foster resilience in healthcare professionals

            Resilience can be defined as the maintenance or quick recovery of mental health during or after periods of stressor exposure, which may result from a potentially traumatising event, challenging life circumstances, a critical life transition phase, or physical illness. Healthcare professionals, such as nurses, physicians, psychologists and social workers, are exposed to various work-related stressors (e.g. patient care, time pressure, administration) and are at increased risk of developing mental disorders. This population may benefit from resilience-promoting training programmes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reliability and validity of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) Spanish Version.

              Resilience is defined as the ability to recover from stress. However, all resilience measures with exception of the Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) assess resources that make resilience possible instead of recovery. The purpose of this study was to translate the BRS to Spanish and to analyze the reliability and validity of its scores. The psychometric properties of its scores were examined in a heterogeneous sample of 620 Spanish adults. Confirmatory factor analyses were carried out to study its scores' evidence of structural validity. Besides, to study its scores' evidence of convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity in relation to other resilience questionnaires (Connor Davidson Resilience Scale 10-item version, Situated Subjective Resilience Questionnaire for Adults and Resiliency Questionnaire for Adults) and to variables such as emotions (Modified Differential Emotions Scale), coping (Person-situation Coping Questionnaire for Adults), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), posttraumatic growth (Posttraumatic Growth Inventory), perceived stress (Perceived Stress Scale) and posttraumatic stress (Davidson Trauma Scale), correlation and regression analyses were conducted. To study its sensitivity, we assessed the effect of sociodemographics and the ability of the scale to identify high-risk populations by conducting analyses of variance and Pearson correlations. The BRS scores showed adequate reliability (α = .83; intraclass coefficient = .69). Confirmatory factor analyses showed that the Spanish version of the BRS is mono-factorial (χ2/df = 2.36; standardized root mean square residual = .036; goodness-of-fit index = .980; comparative fit index = .984; incremental fit index = .984; root mean square error of approximation = .067). They also showed adequate evidence of the scores' convergent, concurrent and predictive validity. The Spanish version of the BRS is a reliable and valid means to assess resilience as the ability to bounce back. (PsycINFO Database Record
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                eg
                Enfermería Global
                Enferm. glob.
                Universidad de Murcia (Murcia, Murcia, Spain )
                1695-6141
                2023
                : 22
                : 71
                : 133-151
                Affiliations
                [2] Murcia Murcia orgnameUniversidad de Murcia Spain
                [3] Murcia orgnameServicio Murciano de Salud orgdiv1Atención Primaria, Área 2 España
                [5] orgnameFundación FADE Murcia España
                [1] Cartagena Murcia orgnameHG Santa Lucía España mteresa.roldan@ 123456carm.es
                [4] Murcia orgnameExperta en Mindfulness España
                Article
                S1695-61412023000300005 S1695-6141(23)02207100005
                10.6018/eglobal.545071
                cc4c6c84-fe99-44a2-8680-89720cefb98d

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 International License.

                History
                : 19 January 2023
                : 31 October 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 0, Equations: 0, References: 13, Pages: 19
                Product

                SciELO Spain

                Categories
                Originales

                Nursing,Enfermería,Compassion Fatigue,Mindfulness,Resilience, Psychological,Stress, Psychological,Resiliencia Psicológica,Atención Plena,Desgaste por empatía,Psicoterapia,Estrés Psicológico,Psychotherapy

                Comments

                Comment on this article