11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidence and treatment of mediastinal leakage after esophagectomy: Insights from the multicenter study on mediastinal leaks

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Mediastinal leakage (ML) is one of the most feared complications of esophagectomy. A standard strategy for its diagnosis and treatment has been difficult to establish because of the great variability in their incidence and mortality rates reported in the existing series.

          AIM

          To assess the incidence, predictive factors, treatment, and associated mortality rate of mediastinal leakage using the standardized definition of mediastinal leaks recently proposed by the Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).

          METHODS

          Seven Italian surgical centers (five high-volume, two low-volume) affiliated with the Italian Society for the Study of Esophageal Diseases designed and implemented a retrospective study including all esophagectomies ( n = 501) with intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis performed from 2014 to 2017. Anastomotic MLs were defined according to the classification recently proposed by the ECCG.

          RESULTS

          Fifty-nine cases of ML were recorded, yielding an overall incidence of 11.8% (95%CI: 9.1%-14.9%). The surgical approach significantly influenced the occurrence of ML: the proportion of leakage was 10.5% and 9% after open and hybrid esophagectomy (HE), respectively, and doubled (20%) after totally minimally invasive esophagectomy (TMIE) ( P = 0.016). No other predictive factors were found. The 30- and 90-d overall mortality rates were 1.4% and 3.2%, respectively; the 30- and 90-d leak-related mortality rates were 5.1% and 10.2%, respectively; the 90-d mortality rates for TMIE and HE were 5.9% and 1.8%, respectively. Endoscopy was the first-line treatment in 49% of ML cases, with the need for retreatment in 17.2% of cases. Surgery was needed in 44.1% of ML cases. Endoscopic treatment had the lowest mortality rate (6.9%). Removal of the gastric tube with stoma formation was necessary in 8 (13.6%) cases.

          CONCLUSION

          The incidence of ML after esophagectomy was high mainly in the TMIE group. However, the general and specific (leak-related) mortality rates were low. Early treatment (surgical or endoscopic) of severe leaks is mandatory to limit related mortality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          International Consensus on Standardization of Data Collection for Complications Associated With Esophagectomy: Esophagectomy Complications Consensus Group (ECCG).

          Perioperative complications influence long- and short-term outcomes after esophagectomy. The absence of a standardized system for defining and recording complications and quality measures after esophageal resection has meant that there is wide variation in evaluating their impact on these outcomes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Benchmarking Complications Associated with Esophagectomy

            Utilizing a standardized dataset with specific definitions to prospectively collect international data to provide a benchmark for complications and outcomes associated with esophagectomy.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Predictors of anastomotic leak after esophagectomy: an analysis of the society of thoracic surgeons general thoracic database.

              Anastomotic leak is an important cause of morbidity and mortality after esophagectomy. Few studies have targeted risk factors for the development of leak after esophagectomy. The purpose of this study is to use The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database to identify variables associated with leak after esophagectomy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Gastroenterol
                World J. Gastroenterol
                WJG
                World Journal of Gastroenterology
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1007-9327
                2219-2840
                21 January 2019
                21 January 2019
                : 25
                : 3
                : 356-366
                Affiliations
                Department of Digestive Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milano 20141, Italy. ubertofumagalliromario@ 123456gmail.com
                Department of Clinical and Experimental Studies, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia 25123, Italy
                General Surgery 2, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia 25123, Italy
                Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano 20132, Italy
                Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, San Raffaele Hospital, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milano 20132, Italy
                Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano 20122, Italy
                Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milan, Milano 20122, Italy
                General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy
                General and Upper GI Surgery Division, University of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy
                Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona 37134, Italy
                Esophageal Surgery Unit, Tuscany Regional Referral Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Disease, Cisanello Hospital, Pisa 56124, Italy
                Esophageal Surgery Unit, Tuscany Regional Referral Center for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Esophageal Disease, Cisanello Hospital, Pisa 56124, Italy
                Department of Clinical and Experimental Studies, Surgical Clinic, University of Brescia, Brescia 25123, Italy
                University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano 10043, Italy
                University of Turin, Department of Oncology, Surgical Oncology and Digestive Surgery, San Luigi University Hospital, Orbassano 10043, Italy
                General Surgery 2, ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia 25123, Italy
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Fumagalli U and de Pascale S conceived and designed the study; Fumagalli U implemented the study and drafted the article; Celotti A made substantial contributions to the acquisition and analysis of data; Baiocchi GL made substantial contributions to the analysis and interpretation of data; Verlato G reviewed the statistical analysis. All authors substantially contributed to the interpretation of data, made critical revisions related to important intellectual content of the manuscript, and approved the final version of the manuscript.

                Corresponding author: Uberto Fumagalli, MD, Director, Surgical Oncologist, Department of Digestive Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milano 20141, Italy. ubertofumagalliromario@ 123456gmail.com

                Telephone: +39-2-57489680 Fax: +39-2-57489930

                Article
                jWJG.v25.i3.pg356
                10.3748/wjg.v25.i3.356
                6343094
                30686903
                cc511979-8099-47ef-91fd-e811c27f7c73
                ©The Author(s) 2019. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.

                History
                : 22 October 2018
                : 4 January 2019
                : 9 January 2019
                Categories
                Retrospective Study

                transthoracic esophagectomy,minimally invasive esophagectomy,mediastinal leak,esophagectomy complications

                Comments

                Comment on this article