45
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Photoacoustic Source Detection and Reflection Artifact Removal Enabled by Deep Learning

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Interventional applications of photoacoustic imaging typically require visualization of point-like targets, such as the small, circular, cross-sectional tips of needles, catheters, or brachytherapy seeds. When these point-like targets are imaged in the presence of highly echogenic structures, the resulting photoacoustic wave creates a reflection artifact that may appear as a true signal. We propose to use deep learning techniques to identify these types of noise artifacts for removal in experimental photoacoustic data. To achieve this goal, a convolutional neural network (CNN) was first trained to locate and classify sources and artifacts in pre-beamformed data simulated with k-Wave. Simulations initially contained one source and one artifact with various medium sound speeds and 2-D target locations. Based on 3,468 test images, we achieved a 100% success rate in classifying both sources and artifacts. After adding noise to assess potential performance in more realistic imaging environments, we achieved at least 98% success rates for channel signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of −9dB or greater, with a severe decrease in performance below −21dB channel SNR. We then explored training with multiple sources and two types of acoustic receivers and achieved similar success with detecting point sources. Networks trained with simulated data were then transferred to experimental waterbath and phantom data with 100% and 96.67% source classification accuracy, respectively (particularly when networks were tested at depths that were included during training). The corresponding mean ± one standard deviation of the point source location error was 0.40 ± 0.22 mm and 0.38 ± 0.25 mm for waterbath and phantom experimental data, respectively, which provides some indication of the resolution limits of our new CNN-based imaging system. We finally show that the CNN-based information can be displayed in a novel artifact-free image format, enabling us to effectively remove reflection artifacts from photoacoustic images, which is not possible with traditional geometry-based beamforming.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Contributors
          Journal
          8310780
          20511
          IEEE Trans Med Imaging
          IEEE Trans Med Imaging
          IEEE transactions on medical imaging
          0278-0062
          1558-254X
          14 July 2018
          June 2018
          01 June 2019
          : 37
          : 6
          : 1464-1477
          Affiliations
          Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
          Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
          Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
          Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Department of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
          Author notes
          Article
          PMC6075868 PMC6075868 6075868 nihpa973045
          10.1109/TMI.2018.2829662
          6075868
          29870374
          cc69ba84-28eb-4875-9699-d430f79bf8e2

          Personal use is permitted, but republication/redistribution requires IEEE permission. See http://www.ieee.org/publications_standards/publications/rights/index.html for more information.

          History
          Categories
          Article

          neural networks,Photoacoustic imaging,reflection artifacts,machine learning,deep learning,artifact reduction

          Comments

          Comment on this article