7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Commentary: Preferred practice pattern for primary eye care in the context of COVID-19 in L V Prasad Eye Institute network in India

      article-commentary

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), originated in Wuhan, China, and spread across the globe. As of 5th June 2020, it has infected nearly 6.5 million individuals and killed more than 400,000 individuals.[1] The route of transmission includes mainly droplets, fomites, and also aerosol particles.[2] There is evidence that SARS-Cov-2 can also cause intestinal infection and present in faeces, however there are no reports on the faecal-oral transmission.[2] The most common symptoms reported are fever and cough.[3 4] Ocular involvement in the form of conjunctivitis can sometimes be the first symptom.[3 5] Advisory measures include social distancing, working from home and safe hygiene practice. Legal measures include travel restrictions, reduction or postponement of elective procedures, lockdown, and curfews.[6] Health care professionals are at an increased risk of infection, including ophthalmologists, 000 other allied health personnel, as most of the ophthalmic procedures bring them in close contact with the patients.[3 5 7] There are also reports of SARS-CoV-2 identified in tears and conjunctival swabs, thus putting clinical eye care professionals at risk of acquiring the infection.[5 8 9 10 11] Different guidelines have been developed for ophthalmologists by the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO),[12] International Council of Ophthalmology (ICO)[13] as well as national societies such as All India Ophthalmological Society (AIOS).[14 15] Similarly, the American Optometry Association has developed guidelines for optometry.[16] However, there are limited guidelines available for primary eye care (PEC) facilities in India. In India, the government sector offers PEC through its Vision Centres (VC) located within the primary health centres (PHC). The non-governmental organizations (NGO) offer care through a stand-alone Vision Centre (VC) model.[17 18] In this article, we describe the guidelines followed in our PEC network, i.e., VC network of L V Prasad Eye Institute (LVPEI), India.[19] LVPEI response to COVID-19 at primary level can be divided into the following steps: Safeguarding infrastructure and equipment Primary eye care personnel protection Patient triaging and Clinical protocols (including optical dispensing) Administrative control and monitoring The protocols can also be viewed at: https://youtu.be/zVcSiHfFojk 1. Protection of infrastructure and equipment: A PEC facility is typically set up in a space of approximately a 500 square feet area. The existing structure has been modified and re-arranged to suit the current COVID-19 situation. This includes seating arrangement to ensure that social distance (3 feet distance) is maintained. Cleaning and disinfection protocols have been developed [Table 1]. Sanitizers are also placed at the entrance of the examination room as well as the optical dispensing counter and used after each examination. As described in other guidelines, breath barriers have been installed on slit lamp biomicroscopes.[12 13 14 15] Additional breath barriers have been created for retinoscopes, autorefractors, and for fundus imaging equipment. The cleaning and disinfection protocols of the PEC facility are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Cleaning and disinfecting protocol for the primary eye care facility Type of surface* Disinfectant to be use Frequency of cleaning Metallic surfaces  Door handles,  Desk handles  Locks, keys  Partition surfaces, if any 1% sodium hypochlorite solution Twice a day (Morning when the centre is opened and after lunch time). Electronic/Information technology equipment  Monitor, Keyboard, Mouse  Mobile, Tablet 70% Isopropyl Alcohol wipes Three times a day Floor  All open areas in the examination room, waiting and seating areas 1% sodium hypochlorite solution Three times a day Wooden surfaces Desks/Benches/Chairs 0.5% Hydrogen Peroxide solution in a spray bottle or 1% sodium hypochlorite solution Twice a day (Morning when the centre is opened and after lunch time) Medical equipment  Slit-lamp including barrier  Trial frame and lenses  Retinoscope along with the Barrier sheet  Autorefractor and its barrier sheet 70% Isopropyl Alcohol wipes  Lenses to be cleaned with 0.5%  Hydrogen Peroxide in a spray bottle Every time before starting an eye examination Optical Dispensing area  Spectacles frames  Display mirror  Display unit desk 0.5% Hydrogen Peroxide in a spray bottle or 70% Isopropyl Alcohol wipes After every patient Vehicle (if available) 1% sodium hypochlorite solution Twice a day* (Once in the morning and once in the evening) *High touch surfaces to be cleaned more frequently 2. Primary eye care personnel protection: Personal protective equipment has been provided as described in other guidelines [Table 2].[13 14 15 16 20] The procedure for donning PPE (putting on) and doffing PPE (taking off) is detailed in [Fig. 1]. Along with PPE, the importance of social distancing and hand hygiene practice has been reinforced. They are also advised to avoid social gatherings and visitors, as well as family holidays. All pregnant women and high risk persons are given leave.[21] For education, the use of online platform is encouraged and being used. Table 2 Personal protective equipment for primary eye care personnel Personal Protective Equipment Frequency of changing Disinfection methods Comment Face Protection (mask) Ideal: Masks N95 or FFP2 (Filtering Face Piece) Minimum: Triple Layer Surgical mask To be changed after 4-5 days of usage (cumulative) unless soiled Daily UV Chamber or Light (254 nm) for 30 minutes Can be disinfected and used for 8-10 cycles Disposable Used masks are stored in individual on ziplock covers Hair cover Ideal: Disposable Surgical cap or impermeable fabric Minimum: Cloth cap Daily Daily Disposable Wash it after single-use Discard after a single use in a separate dustbin Gloves Ideal: Latex or Nitrile (unsterile) Daily Disposable Discard after a single use in a separate dustbin Protective goggles Ideal: Safety goggles Minimum: Post cataract surgery protection goggles Reusable Reusable Cleaned with the 1% hydrogen peroxide solution To be cleaned daily Face Shield Ideal: Visors covering up to the ears Minimum: Open Source Visor Reusable Monthly Cleaned with the hydrogen peroxide solution or 70% isopropyl alcohol wipes To be cleaned daily Cloth gowns Ideal: Disposable or cloth gowns Minimum: Full sleeve dresses/Apron Daily/Reusable Disposable/Wash it after a single-use Foot protection Ideal: Disposable/impermeable fabric shoe cover Minimum: Shoes/footwear that covers the entire ankle Daily Disposable Discard after a single use in a separate dustbin Figure 1 Donning and doffing of personal protective equipment by primary eye care personnel 3. Patient triaging and clinical protocols (including optical dispensing): The PEC facilities are stand-alone units managed by a single person (in most cases). The core functions include refraction and dispensing of spectacles, diagnosis of common eye conditions, and appropriate referrals for further intervention. Hence, the clinical protocols are developed with a focus on these functions as well as other guidelines.[13 14 15 16] Fig. 2 shows the clinical workflow at a PEC facility in our network. All patients are instructed to wear a mask or cover their nose and mouth with cloth/scarf. The patient is greeted (non-contact method). For patient triaging, a COVID-19 questionnaire is administered and temperature is recorded. Anyone with high temperature is referred to the nearest government facility. Before examination, the patient is asked to sign a COVID-19 consent form. Figure 2 Clinical workflow in a primary eye care clinic Recording personal history and demographic information: The standard protocol with social distancing is followed to obtain personal and demographic information. Aadhar card (personal identification card issued by government) and mobile numbers (of patient and next of kin) are mandatory as these details would be required at a later date, if any positive cases are reported among the patients examined in the centre. Attendants are discouraged unless the patient is a child or physically disabled. Visual acuity assessment: Visual acuity for the distance is assessed using standard illuminated Snellen's visual acuity chart. However L-Occluder is not used. Instead, the patient is instructed to close the non-testing eye with his/her hand (not fingers). The near vision chart is held by the examiner at a distance of 35-40 cm, and at least one-meter distance from the patient is maintained while assessing visual acuity. Objective and Subjective Refraction: Objective and subjective refraction is performed on all patients. The trial frame is cleaned with an alcohol wipe before placing it on the patient for refraction. Touching the forehead of the patient to measure working distance is avoided. All the lenses used for neutralization are placed on the desk. After completing a subjective examination, each lens and occluder is cleaned with alcohol wipes before replacing in the trial box. The trial frame is also cleaned each time. Retinoscopy barrier is used while doing retinoscopy, similar to the slit lamp barrier as shown in Fig. 3. Wherever possible, spherical equivalent lenses are prescribed and dispensed, so that movement of lenses and frames can be minimized. Figure 3 A barrier for performing retinoscopy Slit-lamp examination and applanation tonometry: Slit-lamp examination is performed on all patients and the same protocols described in other guidelines are followed.[13 14 15 16] This includes avoiding all non-essential examination as well as 'no talking' policy during the examination. Patients with conjunctivitis are not examined on slit-lamp, and referred directly to higher centres. Aerosol generating procedures like non-contact tonometry are avoided.[22] Wherever possible intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement is avoided. This includes patients who are less than 30 years of age, those with redness in the last 2 weeks, those likely to be referred to higher centres, and those with Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) 6/6 and N6 for near. Procedures like direct ophthalmoscopy is also avoided. Lensometry: If the patient is using spectacles, preferably hand neutralization technique is used to assess lens power and the spectacles are cleaned with hydrogen peroxide before returning to the patient. Fundus camera: A breath barrier is installed with the help of the manufacturer and imaging is restricted to those who require the service. These include patients with a history of diabetes; intraocular pressure more than 20 mm of mercury; and those with shallow anterior chamber. It is also indicated if the vision is not improving with refraction beyond 6/12; and if there is a relative afferent pupillary defect (RAPD). Spectacle dispensing: Patients are advised to clean hands with sterillium at the entrance of the optical outlet. During frame selection, social distancing is maintained. All frames tried by the patient is kept in a separate tray (Ex: Red colour tray). After trial, the frames are cleaned using 0.5% hydrogen peroxide spray, especially the nose pad and nose bridge before replacing them. 4. Administrative control and monitoring: The PEC centres are a part of a larger eye care network, and are monitored by a higher level center through frequent phone calls and physical checks where possible. A monitoring checklist is developed and implemented. The checklist includes indicators to assess the adherence to protocols such as one attendant policy, awareness of health messages, compliance with PPE and cleaning protocols. One-to-one meetings are also held with the PEC personnel. The aim is to reduce anxieties, obtain feedback, provide guidance for implementation, monitoring, and compliance. The PEC personnel is also instructed to submit Incident Reports on any serious event. To summarize, these guidelines are based on the best possible evidence and also align with other recent guidelines in India.[14 15] While these guidelines are developed based on our experience at our higher centres, these can be easily adopted by the PEC facilities in the developing countries of our region. The guidelines are subject to change based on the generation of new evidence as well as changes in national policies. In conclusion, a good triaging system at multiple levels and following the best-preferred practices would significantly mitigate the risk of COVID-19 at the PEC facility. Disclaimer The guidelines are based on the best available evidence as of today as well as experience in our network of more than 100 centres. Despite adherence, they may not mitigate the risk to 100%, however, they would aid in reducing the risk at multiple points. These guidelines will be updated as and when new evidence is generated. Anyone interested in following the updates and the protocols, we would recommend that they get in touch with our Hospital Infection Control Committee.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China

          Abstract Background Since December 2019, when coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) emerged in Wuhan city and rapidly spread throughout China, data have been needed on the clinical characteristics of the affected patients. Methods We extracted data regarding 1099 patients with laboratory-confirmed Covid-19 from 552 hospitals in 30 provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities in mainland China through January 29, 2020. The primary composite end point was admission to an intensive care unit (ICU), the use of mechanical ventilation, or death. Results The median age of the patients was 47 years; 41.9% of the patients were female. The primary composite end point occurred in 67 patients (6.1%), including 5.0% who were admitted to the ICU, 2.3% who underwent invasive mechanical ventilation, and 1.4% who died. Only 1.9% of the patients had a history of direct contact with wildlife. Among nonresidents of Wuhan, 72.3% had contact with residents of Wuhan, including 31.3% who had visited the city. The most common symptoms were fever (43.8% on admission and 88.7% during hospitalization) and cough (67.8%). Diarrhea was uncommon (3.8%). The median incubation period was 4 days (interquartile range, 2 to 7). On admission, ground-glass opacity was the most common radiologic finding on chest computed tomography (CT) (56.4%). No radiographic or CT abnormality was found in 157 of 877 patients (17.9%) with nonsevere disease and in 5 of 173 patients (2.9%) with severe disease. Lymphocytopenia was present in 83.2% of the patients on admission. Conclusions During the first 2 months of the current outbreak, Covid-19 spread rapidly throughout China and caused varying degrees of illness. Patients often presented without fever, and many did not have abnormal radiologic findings. (Funded by the National Health Commission of China and others.)
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with COVID-19 in Wuhan, China: a retrospective cohort study

            Summary Background Since December, 2019, Wuhan, China, has experienced an outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients with COVID-19 have been reported but risk factors for mortality and a detailed clinical course of illness, including viral shedding, have not been well described. Methods In this retrospective, multicentre cohort study, we included all adult inpatients (≥18 years old) with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 from Jinyintan Hospital and Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital (Wuhan, China) who had been discharged or had died by Jan 31, 2020. Demographic, clinical, treatment, and laboratory data, including serial samples for viral RNA detection, were extracted from electronic medical records and compared between survivors and non-survivors. We used univariable and multivariable logistic regression methods to explore the risk factors associated with in-hospital death. Findings 191 patients (135 from Jinyintan Hospital and 56 from Wuhan Pulmonary Hospital) were included in this study, of whom 137 were discharged and 54 died in hospital. 91 (48%) patients had a comorbidity, with hypertension being the most common (58 [30%] patients), followed by diabetes (36 [19%] patients) and coronary heart disease (15 [8%] patients). Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital death associated with older age (odds ratio 1·10, 95% CI 1·03–1·17, per year increase; p=0·0043), higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (5·65, 2·61–12·23; p<0·0001), and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL (18·42, 2·64–128·55; p=0·0033) on admission. Median duration of viral shedding was 20·0 days (IQR 17·0–24·0) in survivors, but SARS-CoV-2 was detectable until death in non-survivors. The longest observed duration of viral shedding in survivors was 37 days. Interpretation The potential risk factors of older age, high SOFA score, and d-dimer greater than 1 μg/mL could help clinicians to identify patients with poor prognosis at an early stage. Prolonged viral shedding provides the rationale for a strategy of isolation of infected patients and optimal antiviral interventions in the future. Funding Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences Innovation Fund for Medical Sciences; National Science Grant for Distinguished Young Scholars; National Key Research and Development Program of China; The Beijing Science and Technology Project; and Major Projects of National Science and Technology on New Drug Creation and Development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Characteristics of Ocular Findings of Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Hubei Province, China

              Key Points Question What are the ocular manifestations and conjunctival viral prevalence in patients from Hubei province, China, with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)? Findings In this case series including 38 patients with COVID-19, 12 patients had ocular manifestations, such as epiphora, conjunctival congestion, or chemosis, and these commonly occurred in patients with more severe systemic manifestations. Reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction results were positive for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in 28 nasopharyngeal swabs and 2 conjunctival swabs, and more significant changes in blood test values appeared in patients with ocular abnormalities. Meaning These data may assist ophthalmologists and others to understand the ocular manifestations of COVID-19, thus enhancing the diagnosis and prevention of the transmission of the disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                Indian J Ophthalmol
                IJO
                Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
                Wolters Kluwer - Medknow (India )
                0301-4738
                1998-3689
                July 2020
                : 68
                : 7
                : 1311-1315
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Allen Foster Community Eye Health Research Centre, Gullapalli Pratibha Rao International Centre for Advancement of Rural Eyecare, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
                [2 ]Brien Holden Eye Research Centre, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
                [3 ]Wellcome Trust/Department of Biotechnology India Alliance Research Fellow, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India
                [4 ]School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
                [5 ]School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA
                Author notes
                Correspondence to: Dr. Rohit C Khanna, L V Prasad Eye Institute, L V Prasad Marg, Banjara Hills, Hyderabad - 500 034, Telangana, India. E-mail: rohit@ 123456lvpei.org
                Article
                IJO-68-1311
                10.4103/ijo.IJO_1417_20
                7574086
                32587156
                ccd8586d-2a25-4600-a14b-40cfe296df7b
                Copyright: © 2020 Indian Journal of Ophthalmology

                This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

                History
                Categories
                Commentary

                Ophthalmology & Optometry
                Ophthalmology & Optometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article