11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Defining New Pathways to Manage the Ongoing Emergence of Bat Rabies in Latin America

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Rabies transmitted by common vampire bats ( Desmodus rotundus) has been known since the early 1900s but continues to expand geographically and in the range of species and environments affected. In this review, we present current knowledge of the epidemiology and management of rabies in D. rotundus and argue that it can be reasonably considered an emerging public health threat. We identify knowledge gaps related to the landscape determinants of the bat reservoir, reduction in bites on humans and livestock, and social barriers to prevention. We discuss how new technologies including autonomously-spreading vaccines and reproductive suppressants targeting bats might manage both rabies and undesirable growth of D. rotundus populations. Finally, we highlight widespread under-reporting of human and animal mortality and the scarcity of studies that quantify the efficacy of control measures such as bat culling. Collaborations between researchers and managers will be crucial to implement the next generation of rabies management in Latin America.

          Related collections

          Most cited references76

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Ecosystem services provided by bats.

          Ecosystem services are the benefits obtained from the environment that increase human well-being. Economic valuation is conducted by measuring the human welfare gains or losses that result from changes in the provision of ecosystem services. Bats have long been postulated to play important roles in arthropod suppression, seed dispersal, and pollination; however, only recently have these ecosystem services begun to be thoroughly evaluated. Here, we review the available literature on the ecological and economic impact of ecosystem services provided by bats. We describe dietary preferences, foraging behaviors, adaptations, and phylogenetic histories of insectivorous, frugivorous, and nectarivorous bats worldwide in the context of their respective ecosystem services. For each trophic ensemble, we discuss the consequences of these ecological interactions on both natural and agricultural systems. Throughout this review, we highlight the research needed to fully determine the ecosystem services in question. Finally, we provide a comprehensive overview of economic valuation of ecosystem services. Unfortunately, few studies estimating the economic value of ecosystem services provided by bats have been conducted to date; however, we outline a framework that could be used in future studies to more fully address this question. Consumptive goods provided by bats, such as food and guano, are often exchanged in markets where the market price indicates an economic value. Nonmarket valuation methods can be used to estimate the economic value of nonconsumptive services, including inputs to agricultural production and recreational activities. Information on the ecological and economic value of ecosystem services provided by bats can be used to inform decisions regarding where and when to protect or restore bat populations and associated habitats, as well as to improve public perception of bats. © 2011 New York Academy of Sciences.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Ecological dynamics of emerging bat virus spillover.

            Viruses that originate in bats may be the most notorious emerging zoonoses that spill over from wildlife into domestic animals and humans. Understanding how these infections filter through ecological systems to cause disease in humans is of profound importance to public health. Transmission of viruses from bats to humans requires a hierarchy of enabling conditions that connect the distribution of reservoir hosts, viral infection within these hosts, and exposure and susceptibility of recipient hosts. For many emerging bat viruses, spillover also requires viral shedding from bats, and survival of the virus in the environment. Focusing on Hendra virus, but also addressing Nipah virus, Ebola virus, Marburg virus and coronaviruses, we delineate this cross-species spillover dynamic from the within-host processes that drive virus excretion to land-use changes that increase interaction among species. We describe how land-use changes may affect co-occurrence and contact between bats and recipient hosts. Two hypotheses may explain temporal and spatial pulses of virus shedding in bat populations: episodic shedding from persistently infected bats or transient epidemics that occur as virus is transmitted among bat populations. Management of livestock also may affect the probability of exposure and disease. Interventions to decrease the probability of virus spillover can be implemented at multiple levels from targeting the reservoir host to managing recipient host exposure and susceptibility. © 2014 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Multiple mortality events in bats: a global review

              Despite conservation concerns for many species of bats, factors causing mortality in bats have not been reviewed since 1970. Here we review and qualitatively describe trends in the occurrence and apparent causes of multiple mortality events (MMEs) in bats around the world. We compiled a database of MMEs, defined as cases in which ≥ 10 dead bats were counted or estimated at a specific location within a maximum timescale of a year, and more typically within a few days or a season. We tabulated 1180 MMEs within nine categories. Prior to the year 2000, intentional killing by humans caused the greatest proportion of MMEs in bats. In North America and Europe, people typically killed bats because they were perceived as nuisances. Intentional killing occurred in South America for vampire bat control, in Asia and Australia for fruit depredation control, and in Africa and Asia for human food. Biotic factors, accidents, and natural abiotic factors were also important historically. Chemical contaminants were confirmed causes of MMEs in North America, Europe, and on islands. Viral and bacterial diseases ranked low as causes of MMEs in bats. Two factors led to a major shift in causes of MMEs in bats at around the year 2000: the global increase of industrial wind-power facilities and the outbreak of white-nose syndrome in North America. Collisions with wind turbines and white-nose syndrome are now the leading causes of reported MMEs in bats. Collectively, over half of all reported MMEs were of anthropogenic origin. The documented occurrence of MMEs in bats due to abiotic factors such as intense storms, flooding, heat waves, and drought is likely to increase in the future with climate change. Coupled with the chronic threats of roosting and foraging habitat loss, increasing mortality through MMEs is unlikely to be compensated for, given the need for high survival in the dynamics of bat populations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Viruses
                Viruses
                viruses
                Viruses
                MDPI
                1999-4915
                08 September 2020
                September 2020
                : 12
                : 9
                : 1002
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Departamento de Ecología y Biodiversidad, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, Santiago 8370146, Chile
                [2 ]Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health and Comparative Medicine, College of Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Graham Kerr Building, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
                [3 ]Centro de Investigación para la Sustentabilidad, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Andrés Bello, 8370146 Santiago, Chile
                [4 ]Association for the Conservation and Development of Natural Resources ILLARIY, Lima 051, Peru; wvalderrama@ 123456illariy.org
                [5 ]Departamento de Pediatría, Obstetricia y Ginecología y de Medicina Preventiva, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
                [6 ]Facultad de Medicina San Fernando, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15001, Peru; sergio.recuenco@ 123456gmail.com
                [7 ]Departamento de Zoologia, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho Campus de Botucatu, Botucatu 18618-970, Brazil; wuieda@ 123456hotmail.com
                [8 ]Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades y Una Salud, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México City 04510, Mexico; gerardosuz@ 123456gmail.com
                [9 ]División Académica de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco, Villahermosa 86150, Mexico; rafaelavilaf@ 123456yahoo.com.mx
                [10 ]Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA; dly3@ 123456cdc.gov
                [11 ]Centro de Controle de Zoonoses da Prefeitura do Município de São Paulo, São Paulo 02031-020, Brazil; lenefalmeida@ 123456hotmail.com
                [12 ]Departamento de Biologia, Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciências e Tecnología do Pará, Tucuruí 68-455-695, Brazil; fernanda.atanaena@ 123456ifpa.edu.br
                [13 ]Pan-American Center for Foot-and-mouth Disease and Veterinary Public Health—Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization (PANAFTOSA—PAHO/WHO), Rio de Janeiro 25045-002, Brazil; molinab@ 123456paho.org (B.M.-F.); vigilato@ 123456paho.org (M.A.N.V.); jcpompei@ 123456paho.org (J.C.A.P.)
                [14 ]OIE-World Organisation for Animal Health, 75017 Paris, France; p.tizzani@ 123456oie.int
                [15 ]Departamento de Mastozoología, Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima 15072, Peru; jecarrerag@ 123456gmail.com
                [16 ]Programa de Conservación de Murciélagos de Perú, Lima 15072, Peru
                [17 ]Director Regional de la Dirección Regional Sectorial Agraria, Gobierno Regional de Apurímac, Abancay 03001, Peru; darcymu@ 123456gmail.com
                [18 ]MRC–University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, Glasgow G61 1QH, UK
                Author notes
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3764-5238
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1538-9373
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3920-0766
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2603-4172
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6644-4518
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7475-2705
                Article
                viruses-12-01002
                10.3390/v12091002
                7551776
                32911766
                ccf187ae-8d59-41ff-a3b4-d48437af2818
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 11 August 2020
                : 02 September 2020
                Categories
                Review

                Microbiology & Virology
                rabies lyssavirus,zoonotic disease,control measures,public health,cross-species transmission

                Comments

                Comment on this article