7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Development and Validation of 2-Azaspiro [4,5] Decan-3-One (Impurity A) in Gabapentin Determination Method Using qNMR Spectroscopy

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The authors developed a 1H qNMR test procedure for identification and quantification of impurity A present in gabapentin active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and gabapentin products. The validation studies helped to determine the limit of quantitation and assess linearity, accuracy, repeatability, intermediate precision, specificity, and robustness of the procedure. Spike-and-recovery assays were used to calculate standard deviations, coefficients of variation, confidence intervals, bias, Fisher’s F test, and Student’s t-test for assay results. The obtained statistical values satisfy the acceptance criteria for the validation parameters. The authors compared the results of impurity A quantification in gabapentin APIs and capsules by using the 1H qNMR and HPLC test methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references15

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          NMR Chemical Shifts of Common Laboratory Solvents as Trace Impurities.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Validation of quantitative NMR.

            NMR is by definition a quantitative spectroscopic tool because the intensity of a resonance line is directly proportional to the number of resonant nuclei (spins). This fact enables, in principle, a precise determination of the amount of molecular structures and, hence, of substances in solids as well as liquids. With the increase of sensitivity due to stronger and stronger static magnetic fields including improved electronics the detection limits have been pushed down significantly. However, the lack of a precise protocol that considers and controls the aspects of both the measurement procedure as well as the spectra processing and evaluation is responsible for the fact that quantitative investigations of identical samples in various laboratories may differ severely (deviations up to 90% relative to gravimetric reference values). Here, a validated protocol for quantitative high resolution 1H-NMR using single pulse excitation is described that has been confirmed by national and international round robin tests. It considers all issues regarding linearity, robustness, specificity, selectivity and accuracy as well as influences of instrument specific parameters and the data processing and evaluation routines. This procedure was tested by the investigation of three different 5-model-compound mixtures. As a result of the round robin tests using the proposed protocol it was found that the maximum combined measurement uncertainty is 1.5% for a confidence interval of 95%. This applies both for the determination of molar ratios and of the amount fractions of the various components. Further, the validation was extended to purity determinations of substances as shown for 1,8-epoxy-p-menthane (cineole).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Severe postherpetic neuralgia and other neuropathic pain syndromes alleviated by topical gabapentin.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                Molecules
                Molecules
                molecules
                Molecules
                MDPI
                1420-3049
                16 March 2021
                March 2021
                : 26
                : 6
                : 1656
                Affiliations
                [1 ]“Scientific Centre for Expert Evaluation of Medicinal Products” of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Federal State Budgetary Institution, 8/2 Petrovsky Blvd, 127051 Moscow, Russia; MoiseevSV@ 123456expmed.ru (S.V.M.); mkhorolski@ 123456gmail.com (M.D.K.); Lutceva@ 123456expmed.ru (A.I.L.)
                [2 ]Department of Pharmaceutical and Toxicological Chemistry Named by A.P. Arzamastsev, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), 8, Bldg. 2 St. Trubetskaya, 119991 Moscow, Russia
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: kuzminaN@ 123456expmed.ru
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8222-0805
                Article
                molecules-26-01656
                10.3390/molecules26061656
                8002367
                cd106f54-7a0d-411e-aa1d-72f5074bbbca
                © 2021 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 24 February 2021
                : 13 March 2021
                Categories
                Article

                gabapentin,impurity a,validation,limit of the quantitation,linearity,accuracy,repeatability,precision,specificity,robustness,qnmr,hplc

                Comments

                Comment on this article