16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      The Responsiveness and Minimal Important Change (MIC) of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS).

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Study Design A prospective cohort study. Background Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs) are widely used to evaluate functional limitations. Considering PROMs for shoulder instability, information is lacking with regard to what constitutes a relevant change from baseline scores. Objectives To evaluate the responsiveness of the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) and the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) and estimate their Minimal Important Change (MIC). Methods 105 consecutive patients with shoulder instability completed five PROMs at baseline and at 6-months follow-up. The PROMs included the WOSI and OSIS, the Simple Shoulder Test (SST), the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS) and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand assessment (DASH). Patients also rated their functional change on an anchor question at follow-up. Responsiveness was evaluated by testing nine hypotheses regarding pre-defined correlations between the changes in PROM scores, by calculating the area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, and by calculating the Standard Response Mean (SRM) and Effect Size (ES) statistics. The MIC was determined by identifying the optimal cut-off on the ROC curve. Results Seven out of nine hypotheses (78%) were confirmed; as expected a high correlation (0.77) was found between change scores of the WOSI and OSIS, whereas the correlations of the changes in WOSI and OSIS with changes in general shoulder PROMs were slightly lower (0.61-0.75). The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.83 (95% CI 0.75-0.91) for the OSIS and 0.82 (95% CI 0.74-0.90) for the WOSI. The MIC was about 6 points for the OSIS and about 14 points for the WOSI. Conclusion Both the WOSI and OSIS are able to measure change in shoulder function in patients with shoulder instability. The estimated MIC is 6 points for the OSIS (on a scale from 0-48) and 14 points for the WOSI (on a scale from 0-100). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, Epub 12 May 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.6548.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          J Orthop Sports Phys Ther
          The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy
          Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy (JOSPT)
          1938-1344
          0190-6011
          May 12 2017
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
          [2 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Waterland Ziekenhuis, Purmerend, the Netherlands.
          [3 ] Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Traumatology, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands. Professor of Reconstructive Medicine University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands.
          [4 ] Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics and the EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
          Article
          10.2519/jospt.2017.6548
          28499344
          cd1f12dc-ce9c-4cd3-88e9-785de820ea30
          History

          clinimetrics,functional outcome measures,outcome assessment,shoulder

          Comments

          Comment on this article