6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A Multi-Filovirus Vaccine Candidate: Co-Expression of Ebola, Sudan, and Marburg Antigens in a Single Vector

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          In the infectious diseases field, protective immunity against individual virus species or strains does not always confer cross-reactive immunity to closely related viruses, leaving individuals susceptible to disease after exposure to related virus species. This is a significant hurdle in the field of vaccine development, in which broadly protective vaccines represent an unmet need. This is particularly evident for filoviruses, as there are multiple family members that can cause lethal haemorrhagic fever, including Zaire ebolavirus, Sudan ebolavirus, and Marburg virus. In an attempt to address this need, both pre-clinical and clinical studies previously used mixed or co-administered monovalent vaccines to prevent filovirus mediated disease. However, these multi-vaccine and multi-dose vaccination regimens do not represent a practical immunisation scheme when considering the target endemic areas. We describe here the development of a single multi-pathogen filovirus vaccine candidate based on a replication-deficient simian adenoviral vector. Our vaccine candidate encodes three different filovirus glycoproteins in one vector and induces strong cellular and humoral immunity to all three viral glycoproteins after a single vaccination. Crucially, it was found to be protective in a stringent Zaire ebolavirus challenge in guinea pigs in a one-shot vaccination regimen. This trivalent filovirus vaccine offers a tenable vaccine product that could be rapidly translated to the clinic to prevent filovirus-mediated viral haemorrhagic fever.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The effect of dose on the safety and immunogenicity of the VSV Ebola candidate vaccine: a randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1/2 trial.

          Safe and effective vaccines against Ebola could prevent or control outbreaks. The safe use of replication-competent vaccines requires a careful dose-selection process. We report the first safety and immunogenicity results in volunteers receiving 3 × 10(5) plaque-forming units (pfu) of the recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based candidate vaccine expressing the Zaire Ebola virus glycoprotein (rVSV-ZEBOV; low-dose vaccinees) compared with 59 volunteers who had received 1 ×10(7) pfu (n=35) or 5 × 10(7) pfu (n=16) of rVSV-ZEBOV (high-dose vaccinees) or placebo (n=8) before a safety-driven study hold.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chimpanzee Adenovirus Vector Ebola Vaccine - Preliminary Report.

            Background The unprecedented 2014 epidemic of Ebola virus disease (EVD) has prompted an international response to accelerate the availability of a preventive vaccine. A replication-defective recombinant chimpanzee adenovirus type 3-vectored ebolavirus vaccine (cAd3-EBO), encoding the glycoprotein from Zaire and Sudan species that offers protection in the nonhuman primate model, was rapidly advanced into phase 1 clinical evaluation. Methods We conducted a phase 1, dose-escalation, open-label trial of cAd3-EBO. Twenty healthy adults, in sequentially enrolled groups of 10 each, received vaccination intramuscularly in doses of 2×10(10) particle units or 2×10(11) particle units. Primary and secondary end points related to safety and immunogenicity were assessed throughout the first 4 weeks after vaccination. Results In this small study, no safety concerns were identified; however, transient fever developed within 1 day after vaccination in two participants who had received the 2×10(11) particle-unit dose. Glycoprotein-specific antibodies were induced in all 20 participants; the titers were of greater magnitude in the group that received the 2×10(11) particle-unit dose than in the group that received the 2×10(10) particle-unit dose (geometric mean titer against the Zaire antigen, 2037 vs. 331; P=0.001). Glycoprotein-specific T-cell responses were more frequent among those who received the 2x10(11) particle-unit dose than among those who received the 2×10(10) particle-unit dose, with a CD4 response in 10 of 10 participants versus 3 of 10 participants (P=0.004) and a CD8 response in 7 of 10 participants versus 2 of 10 participants (P=0.07). Conclusions Reactogenicity and immune responses to cAd3-EBO vaccine were dose-dependent. At the 2×10(11) particle-unit dose, glycoprotein Zaire-specific antibody responses were in the range reported to be associated with vaccine-induced protective immunity in challenge studies involving nonhuman primates. Clinical trials assessing cAd3-EBO are ongoing. (Funded by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health; VRC 207 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02231866 .).
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Systematic Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies against Ebola Virus GP Defines Features that Contribute to Protection

              Antibodies are promising post-exposure therapies against emerging viruses, but which antibody features and in vitro assays best forecast protection are unclear. Our international consortium systematically evaluated antibodies against Ebola virus (EBOV) using multidisciplinary assays. For each antibody, we evaluated epitopes recognized on the viral surface glycoprotein (GP) and secreted glycoprotein (sGP), readouts of multiple neutralization assays, fraction of virions left un-neutralized, glycan structures, phagocytic and natural killer cell functions elicited, and in vivo protection in a mouse challenge model. Neutralization and induction of multiple immune effector functions (IEFs) correlated most strongly with protection. Neutralization predominantly occurred via epitopes maintained on endosomally cleaved GP, whereas maximal IEF mapped to epitopes farthest from the viral membrane. Unexpectedly, sGP cross-reactivity did not significantly influence in vivo protection. This comprehensive dataset provides a rubric to evaluate novel antibodies and vaccine responses and a roadmap for therapeutic development for EBOV and related viruses. The systematic assessment of the effector functions and binding sites of antibodies against Ebola virus provides a generalizable framework to evaluate the determinants of antibody-mediate protection in viral disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Vaccines (Basel)
                Vaccines (Basel)
                vaccines
                Vaccines
                MDPI
                2076-393X
                21 May 2020
                June 2020
                : 8
                : 2
                : 241
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Nuffield Department of Medicine, Jenner Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK; sarah.sebastian@ 123456vaccitech.co.uk (S.S.); amy.flaxman@ 123456ndm.ox.ac.uk (A.F.); kuanmcha@ 123456gmail.com (K.M.C.); marta.ulaszewska@ 123456ndm.ox.ac.uk (M.U.); ciaran.gilbride@ 123456st-annes.ox.ac.uk (C.G.); hannah.sharpe@ 123456seh.ox.ac.uk (H.S.); alex.spencer@ 123456ndm.ox.ac.uk (A.J.S.); sarah.gilbert@ 123456ndm.ox.ac.uk (S.G.)
                [2 ]Current address: Vaccitech Ltd., Oxford Science Park, Oxford OX4 4GE, UK
                [3 ]School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer BN1 9QG, UK; ew323@ 123456sussex.ac.uk
                [4 ]Public Health England, Porton Down, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JG, UK; stuart.dowall@ 123456phe.gov.uk (S.D.); roger.hewson@ 123456phe.gov.uk (R.H.)
                Author notes
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-1372
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1194-2429
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7041-5138
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6823-9750
                Article
                vaccines-08-00241
                10.3390/vaccines8020241
                7349952
                32455764
                cd380b47-58d9-46ad-8df7-4fc2e024033b
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 06 April 2020
                : 19 May 2020
                Categories
                Article

                ebola,marburg,filovirus,vaccine,viral vector
                ebola, marburg, filovirus, vaccine, viral vector

                Comments

                Comment on this article