6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cartilage defect location and stiffness predispose the tibiofemoral joint to aberrant loading conditions during stance phase of gait

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          The current study quantified the influence of cartilage defect location on the tibiofemoral load distribution during gait. Furthermore, changes in local mechanical stiffness representative for matrix damage or bone ingrowth were investigated. This may provide insights in the mechanical factors contributing to cartilage degeneration in the presence of an articular cartilage defect.

          Methods

          The load distribution following cartilage defects was calculated using a musculoskeletal model that included tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joints with 6 degrees-of-freedom. Circular cartilage defects of 100 mm 2 were created at different locations in the tibiofemoral contact geometry. By assigning different mechanical properties to these defect locations, softening and hardening of the tissue were evaluated.

          Results

          Results indicate that cartilage defects located at the load-bearing area only affect the load distribution of the involved compartment. Cartilage defects in the central part of the tibia plateau and anterior-central part of the medial femoral condyle present the largest influence on load distribution. Softening at the defect location results in overloading, i.e., increased contact pressure and compressive strains, of the surrounding tissue. In contrast, inside the defect, the contact pressure decreases and the compressive strain increases. Hardening at the defect location presents the opposite results in load distribution compared to softening. Sensitivity analysis reveals that the surrounding contact pressure, contact force and compressive strain alter significantly when the elastic modulus is below 7 MPa or above 18 MPa.

          Conclusion

          Alterations in local mechanical behavior within the high load bearing area resulted in aberrant loading conditions, thereby potentially affecting the homeostatic balance not only at the defect but also at the tissue surrounding and opposing the defect. Especially, cartilage softening predisposes the tissue to loads that may contribute to accelerated risk of cartilage degeneration and the initiation or progression towards osteoarthritis of the whole compartment.

          Related collections

          Most cited references77

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Articular cartilage defects in 1,000 knee arthroscopies.

          Focal chondral or osteochondral defects can be painful and disabling, have a poor capacity for repair, and may predispose patients for osteoarthritis. New surgical procedures that aim to reestablish hyaline cartilage have been introduced and the results seem promising. The purpose of this study is to provide reliable data on chondral and osteochondral defects in patients with symptomatic knees requiring arthroscopy and to calculate the prevalence of patients who might benefit from cartilage repair surgery. Prospective study. One thousand consecutive knee arthroscopies were included in this study. Immediately after each arthroscopy, the surgeon completed a questionnaire providing detailed information about the findings. Chondral and osteochondral lesions were classified in accordance with the system recommended by the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS). Chondral or osteochondral lesions (of any type) were found in 61% of the patients. Focal chondral or osteochondral defects were found in 19% of the patients. In these patients, 61% related their current knee problem to a previous trauma, and a concomitant meniscal or anterior cruciate ligament injury was found in 42% (n = 81) and 26% (n = 50), respectively. The mean chondral or osteochondral total defect area was 2.1 cm(2) (range, 0.5 to 12; standard deviation [SD], 1.5). The main focal chondral or osteochondral defect was found on the medial femoral condyle in 58%, patella in 11%, lateral tibia in 11%, lateral femoral condyle in 9%, trochlea in 6%, and medial tibia in 5%. It has been suggested that cartilage repair surgery may be most suitable in patients younger than 40 to 50 years old. A single, well-defined ICRS grade III or IV defect with an area of at least 1 cm(2) in a patient younger than 40, 45, or 50 years accounted for 5.3%, 6.1%, and 7.1% of all arthroscopies, respectively. Our study supports the contention that articular cartilage defects are common. It has the advantages of a prospective design and use of a new classification system recommended by the ICRS. This modern system focuses on objectively measurable parameters of the lesion's extent and not its surface appearance.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Bone position estimation from skin marker co-ordinates using global optimisation with joint constraints.

            Widespread use of gait or motion analysis in the diagnosis of patients with locomotor pathology and the subsequent planning and assessment of treatment has been limited because of its reliability, particularly in evaluating frontal and transverse plane components. This is because spatial reconstruction of the musculoskeletal system and calculation of its kinematics and kinetics via a skin marker-based multi-link model are subject to marker skin movement artefacts. Traditional methods treat each body segment separately without imposing joint constraints, resulting in apparent dislocations at joints predominantly because of skin movement artefacts. An optimisation method for the determination of the positions and orientations of multi-link musculoskeletal models from marker co-ordinates is presented. It is based on the minimisation of the weighted sum of squared distances between measured and model-determined marker positions. The model imposes joint constraints. Numerical experiments were performed to show that the new method is capable of eliminating joint dislocations and giving more accurate model position and orientation estimations. It is suggested that, with joint constraints and a global error compensation scheme, the effects of measurement errors on the reconstruction of the musculoskeletal system and subsequent mechanical analyses can be reduced globally. The proposed method minimises errors in axial rotation and ab/adduction at the joints and may extend the applicability of gait analysis to clinical problems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Results after microfracture of full-thickness chondral defects in different compartments in the knee.

              To determine if the clinical results after microfracture of full-thickness cartilage lesions deteriorate over a period of 36 months. Between 1999 and 2002 85 patients (mean age 39.5 years) with full-thickness cartilage lesions underwent the microfracture procedure and were evaluated preoperatively and 6, 18 and 36 months after surgery. Exclusion criteria were meniscal pathologies, axial malpositioning and ligament instabilities. Baseline clinical scores were compared with follow-up data by paired Wilcoxon-tests for the modified Cincinnati knee and the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS)-score. The effects of the lesion localization and Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) parameters were evaluated using the Pearson correlation and independent samples tests. Both scores revealed significant improvement 18 months after microfracture (P<0.0001). Within the second 18 months after surgery there was a significant deterioration in the ICRS-score (P<0.0001). The best results could be observed in chondral lesions of the femoral condyles. Defects in other areas of the knee deteriorated between 18 and 36 months after microfracture. MRI 36 months after surgery revealed best defect filling in lesions on the femoral condyles with significant difference in the other areas (P<0.02). The Pearson coefficient of correlation between defect filling and ICRS-score was 0.84 and significant at the 0.01 level. Microfracture is a minimal invasive method with good short-term results in the treatment of small cartilage defects. A deterioration of the results starts 18 months after surgery and is most evident in the ICRS-score. The best prognostic factors have young patients with defects on the femoral condyles.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: InvestigationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                16 October 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 10
                : e0205842
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Movement Sciences, Human Movement Biomechanics Research Group, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                [2 ] Institute for Biomechanics, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
                [3 ] Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
                [4 ] Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
                [5 ] Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America
                [6 ] Department of Mechanical Engineering, Biomechanics Section, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
                University of California Berkeley, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8891-7571
                Article
                PONE-D-18-17204
                10.1371/journal.pone.0205842
                6191138
                30325946
                cd871cd0-4e12-4e92-ac0f-bfbff22bfb59

                This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

                History
                : 8 June 2018
                : 2 October 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 8, Tables: 0, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: IWT
                Award ID: 131105
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004497, Onderzoeksraad, KU Leuven;
                Award ID: OT/13/083
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: Whitaker International Summer Program (US)
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000009, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: EB015410
                Award Recipient :
                Research was supported by funding of the KU Leuven research council OT/13/083 (IJ), PhD grant of the Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology IWT 131105 (LZ), Whitaker International Summer Program (CRS) and NIH Grant EB015410 (DGT). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Cartilage
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Cartilage
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Cartilage
                Articular Cartilage
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Cartilage
                Articular Cartilage
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeletal Joints
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeletal Joints
                Physical Sciences
                Materials Science
                Material Properties
                Mechanical Properties
                Stiffness
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeletal Joints
                Knee Joints
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeletal Joints
                Knee Joints
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeleton
                Femur
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Musculoskeletal System
                Skeleton
                Femur
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Cartilage
                Elastic Cartilage
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Biological Tissue
                Connective Tissue
                Cartilage
                Elastic Cartilage
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Classical Mechanics
                Deformation
                Physical Sciences
                Physics
                Classical Mechanics
                Damage Mechanics
                Deformation
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article