36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      PIpelle Prospective ENDOmetrial carcinoma (PIPENDO) study, pre-operative recognition of high risk endometrial carcinoma: a multicentre prospective cohort study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Endometrial carcinoma is the most common gynaecologic malignancy in industrialised countries and the incidence is still rising. Primary treatment is based on preoperative risk classification and consists in most cases of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. In patients with serous and clear cell histology a complete surgical staging is mandatory. However, in routine clinical practice final histology regularly does not correspond with the preoperative histological diagnosis. This results in both over and under treatment.

          Methods/Design

          The aim of this multicentre, prospective cohort study is to select a panel of prognostic biomarkers to improve preoperative diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma in order to identify those patients that need extended surgery and/or additional treatment. Additionally, we will determine whether incorporation of cervical cytology and comorbidity could improve this preoperative risk classification. All patients treated for endometrial carcinoma in the participating hospitals from September 2011 till December 2013 are included. Patient characteristics, as well as comorbidity are registered. Patients without preoperative histology, history of hysterectomy and/or endometrial carcinoma or no surgical treatment including hysterectomy are excluded. The preoperative histology and final pathology will be reviewed and compared by expert pathologists. Additional immunohistochemical analysis of IMP3, p53, ER, PR, MLH1, PTEN, beta-catenin, p16, Ki-67, stathmin, ARID1A and L1CAM will be performed. Preoperative histology will be compared with the final pathology results. Follow-up will be at least 24 months to determine risk factors for recurrence and outcome.

          Discussion

          This study is designed to improve surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma patients. A total of 432 endometrial carcinoma patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2013. Follow-up will be completed in 2015. Preoperative histology will be evaluated systematically and background endometrium will be classified. This is the first study incorporating immunohistochemistry, cervical cytology and comorbidity to define the optimal panel of prognostic biomarkers that contribute in clinical decision making in the management of endometrial carcinoma.

          Trial registration

          Netherlands Trial Register number NTR3503

          Related collections

          Most cited references30

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Carcinoma of the corpus uteri. FIGO 26th Annual Report on the Results of Treatment in Gynecological Cancer.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found
            Is Open Access

            Hormone receptor loss in endometrial carcinoma curettage predicts lymph node metastasis and poor outcome in prospective multicentre trial.

            Preoperative histologic examination of tumour tissue is essential when deciding if endometrial cancer surgery should include lymph node sampling. We wanted to investigate if biomarkers could improve prediction of lymph node metastasis and outcome. Curettage specimens from 832 endometrial carcinoma patients prospectively recruited from 10 centres in the MoMaTEC trial (Molecular Markers in Treatment of Endometrial Cancer) were investigated for hormone receptor and p53 status. Eighteen per cent of tumours were double negative for oestrogen- and progesterone receptors (ER/PR loss), 24% overexpressed p53. Pathologic expression of all markers correlated with nodal metastases, high FIGO (Federation International of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage, non-endometrioid histology, high grade and poor prognosis (all P<0.001). ER/PR loss independently predicted lymph node metastasis (odds ratios (OR) 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.7) adjusted for preoperative curettage histology and predicted poor disease-specific survival adjusted for age, FIGO stage, histologic type, grade and myometrial infiltration (hazard ratio (HR) 2.3, 95% CI 1.4-3.9). For lymph node negative endometrioid tumours, ER/PR loss influenced survival independent of grade. Double negative hormone receptor status in endometrial cancer curettage independently predicts lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in a prospective multicentre setting. Implementing hormone receptor status to improve risk-stratification for selecting patients unlikely to benefit from lymphadenectomy seems justified. Copyright © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Management of women with uterine papillary serous cancer: a Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) review.

              Uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) is a clinically and pathologically distinct subtype of endometrial cancer. Although less common than its endometrioid carcinoma (EEC) counterpart, UPSC accounts for a disproportionate number of endometrial cancer related deaths. To date, limited prospective trials exist from which evidence-based management can be developed. This review summarizes the available literature concerning UPSC in an effort to provide the clinician with information pertinent to its management. MEDLINE was searched for all research articles published in English between January 1, 1966 and May 1, 2009 in which the studied population included women diagnosed with UPSC. Although preference was given to prospective studies, studies were not limited by design or by numbers of subjects given the paucity of available reports. UPSC is morphologically and genetically different from EEC. Women often present with postmenopausal vaginal bleeding, but may also present with abnormal cervical cytology, ascites, or a pelvic mass. In some cases, the diagnosis may be made with endometrial biopsy, while in other cases it is not made until the time of definitive surgery. Metastatic disease is common and best identified via comprehensive surgical staging. Local and distant recurrences occur frequently, with extra-pelvic relapses reported most commonly. Optimal cytoreduction and adjuvant platinum/taxane-based chemotherapy appear to improve survival, while adjuvant radiotherapy may contribute to loco-regional disease control. Women diagnosed with UPSC should undergo comprehensive surgical staging and an attempt at optimal cytoreduction. Platinum/taxane-based adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in the treatment of both early- and advanced-stage patients. Careful long-term surveillance is indicated as many of these women will recur. Prospective clinical trials of women with UPSC are necessary in order to delineate the optimal therapy for women with newly diagnosed and recurrent disease.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +31243614314 , nicole.visser@radboudumc.nl
                Hans.Bulten@radboudumc.nl
                a.vd.wurff@elisabeth.nl
                e.boss@mmc.nl
                c.bronkhorst@jbz.nl
                HFeijen@Amphia.nl
                jhaartsen@elkerliek.nl
                hvherk@elkerliek.nl
                i.d.kievit@cwz.nl
                P.Klinkhamer@pamm.nl
                B.Pijlman@jbz.nl
                m.snijders@cwz.nl
                ingrid.vandenput@catharinaziekenhuis.nl
                c.vos@elisabeth.nl
                pdwit@amphia.nl
                L.vd.Poll@ikz.nl
                Leon.Massuger@radboudumc.nl
                hpijnenborg@tsz.nl
                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2407
                30 June 2015
                30 June 2015
                2015
                : 15
                : 487
                Affiliations
                [ ]Dept. Pathology, Radboud university medical centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Pathology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maxima Medical Centre, Veldhoven and Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Pathology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ′s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Pathology, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Pathology, Canisius Wilhemina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Pathology, PAMM, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, ′s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Canisius Wilhemina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Pathology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                [ ]Comprehensive Cancer Centre the Netherlands, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud university medical centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
                [ ]Dept. Obstetrics and Gynaecology, TweeSteden Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands
                Article
                1487
                10.1186/s12885-015-1487-3
                4485884
                26123742
                cdae59f7-c60c-4011-abc9-fd38b62a7f01
                © Visser et al. 2015

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 7 November 2014
                : 10 June 2015
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2015

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                endometrial carcinoma,histological diagnosis,endometrial sampling,postmenopausal bleeding,observational cohort study,risk assessment

                Comments

                Comment on this article