12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      When Will People Pay to Pollute? Environmental Taxes, Political Trust and Experimental Evidence from Britain

      British Journal of Political Science
      Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          This article presents results from survey experiments investigating conditions under which Britons are willing to pay taxes on polluting activities. People are no more willing if revenues are hypothecated for spending on environmental protection, while making such taxes more relevant to people – by naming petrol and electricity as products to which they will apply – has a modestly negative effect. Public willingness increases sharply if people are told that new environmental taxes would be offset by cuts to other taxes, but political distrust appears to undermine much of this effect. Previous studies have argued that political trust shapes public opinion with respect to environmental and many other policies. But this article provides the first experimental evidence suggesting that the relationship is causal, at least for one specific facet: cynicism about public officials’ honesty and integrity. The results suggest a need to make confidence in the trustworthiness of public officials and their promises more central to conceptualizations of political trust.

          Related collections

          Most cited references47

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Political Issues and Trust in Government: 1964–1970.

          National survey data demonstrate that support of the federal government decreased substantially between 1964 and 1970. Policy preference, a lack of perceived difference between the parties, and policy dissatisfaction were hypothesized as correlates of trust and alternative explanations of this decrease. Analysis revealed that the increased distrust in government, or cynicism, was associated with reactions to the issues of racial integration and U.S. involvement in the Vietnam war. A curvilinear relationship was found between policy preference on these and other contemporary social issues and political cynicism. The minority favoring centrist policies was more likely to trust the government than the large proportion who preferred noncentrist policy alternatives. This complex relationship between trust and policy preference is explained by dissatisfaction with the policies ofbothpolitical parties. The dissatisfied noncentrists formed highly polarized and distinct types: “cynics of the left,” who preferred policies providing social change, and “cynics of the right,” who favored policies of social control.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            CLIMATE CHANGE. Possible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus.

            Much study has been devoted to the possible causes of an apparent decrease in the upward trend of global surface temperatures since 1998, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the global warming "hiatus." Here, we present an updated global surface temperature analysis that reveals that global trends are higher than those reported by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, especially in recent decades, and that the central estimate for the rate of warming during the first 15 years of the 21st century is at least as great as the last half of the 20th century. These results do not support the notion of a "slowdown" in the increase of global surface temperature.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                British Journal of Political Science
                Brit. J. Polit. Sci.
                Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                0007-1234
                1469-2112
                April 2019
                April 06 2017
                April 2019
                : 49
                : 2
                : 661-682
                Article
                10.1017/S0007123416000727
                cdbab430-bf22-4628-9371-3e93a3e22281
                © 2019

                https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article