13
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Surface Displacement Distributions for the July 2019 Ridgecrest, California, Earthquake Ruptures

      1 , 1 , 2 , 3 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 8 , 8 , 7 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 1 , 12 , 9 , 9 , 8 , 12 , 11 , 13 , 3 , 10 , 14 , 13 , 2 , 6 , 3 , 15 , 9 , 11 , 9 , 8 , 8 , 14 , 8 , 2 , 9 , 11 , 9 , 11 , 11 , 16 , 15
      Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
      Seismological Society of America (SSA)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Surface rupture in the 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence occurred along two orthogonal cross faults and includes dominantly left-lateral and northeast-striking rupture in the Mw 6.4 foreshock and dominantly right-lateral and northwest-striking rupture in the Mw 7.1 mainshock. We present >650 field-based, surface-displacement observations for these ruptures and synthesize our results into cumulative along-strike displacement distributions. Using these data, we calculate displacement gradients and compare our results with historical strike-slip ruptures in the eastern California shear zone. For the Mw 6.4 rupture, we report 96 displacements measured along 18 km of northeast-striking rupture. Cumulative displacement curves for the rupture yield a mean left-lateral displacement of 0.3–0.5 m and maximum of 0.7–1.6 m. Net mean vertical displacement based on the difference of down-to-the-west (DTW) and down-to-the-east (DTE) displacement curves is close to zero (0.02 m DTW). The Mw 6.4 displacement distribution shows that the majority of displacement occurred southwest of the intersection with the Mw 7.1 rupture. The Mw 7.1 rupture is northwest-striking and 50 km long based on 576 field measurements. Displacement curves indicate a mean right-lateral displacement of 1.2–1.7 m and a maximum of 4.3–7.0 m. Net vertical displacement in the rupture averages 0.3 m DTW. The Mw 7.1 displacement distributions demonstrate that maximum displacement occurred along a 12-km-long portion of the fault near the Mw 7.1 epicenter, releasing 66% of the geologically based seismic moment along 24% of the total rupture length. Using our displacement distributions, we calculate kilometer-scale displacement gradients for the Mw 7.1 rupture. The steepest gradients (∼1–3 m/km) flank the 12-km-long region of maximum displacement. In contrast, gradients for the 1992 Mw 7.3 Landers and 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine earthquakes are <0.6 m/km. Our displacement distributions are important for understanding the influence of cross-fault rupture on Mw 6.4 and 7.1 rupture length and displacement and will facilitate comparisons with distributions generated remotely and at broader scales.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          A moment magnitude scale

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Displacement and Geometrical Characteristics of Earthquake Surface Ruptures: Issues and Implications for Seismic-Hazard Analysis and the Process of Earthquake Rupture

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast, Version 3 (UCERF3)--The Time-Independent Model

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
                Seismological Society of America (SSA)
                0037-1106
                1943-3573
                June 23 2020
                June 23 2020
                Affiliations
                [1 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Golden, Colorado, U.S.A.
                [2 ]California Geological Survey, San Mateo, California, U.S.A.
                [3 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
                [4 ]California State University, Fullerton, California, U.S.A.
                [5 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Seattle, Washington, U.S.A.
                [6 ]Pacific Gas and Electric Company, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
                [7 ]Desert Research Institute, Reno, Nevada, U.S.A.
                [8 ]U.S. Geological Survey, Moffett Field, California, U.S.A.
                [9 ]California Geological Survey, Sacramento, California, U.S.A.
                [10 ]Bureau of Reclamation, Denver Federal Center, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.
                [11 ]California Geological Survey, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
                [12 ]University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, U.S.A.
                [13 ]InfraTerra Inc., San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
                [14 ]Nevada Bureau of Mines and Geology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, U.S.A.
                [15 ]Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, U.S.A.
                [16 ]Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, U.S.A.
                Article
                10.1785/0120200058
                cdcd190f-38fc-4053-955a-b9943e5e62c3
                © 2020
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article