36
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Review: Head and Eye Movements and Gaze Tracking in Baseball Batting

      ,
      Optometry and Vision Science
      Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references80

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          From eye movements to actions: how batsmen hit the ball.

          In cricket, a batsman watches a fast bowler's ball come toward him at a high and unpredictable speed, bouncing off ground of uncertain hardness. Although he views the trajectory for little more than half a second, he can accurately judge where and when the ball will reach him. Batsmen's eye movements monitor the moment when the ball is released, make a predictive saccade to the place where they expect it to hit the ground, wait for it to bounce, and follow its trajectory for 100-200 ms after the bounce. We show how information provided by these fixations may allow precise prediction of the ball's timing and placement. Comparing players with different skill levels, we found that a short latency for the first saccade distinguished good from poor batsmen, and that a cricket player's eye movement strategy contributes to his skill in the game.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Does the brain model Newton's laws?

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Visuo-motor coordination and internal models for object interception.

              Intercepting and avoiding collisions with moving objects are fundamental skills in daily life. Anticipatory behavior is required because of significant delays in transforming sensory information about target and body motion into a timed motor response. The ability to predict the kinematics and kinetics of interception or avoidance hundreds of milliseconds before the event may depend on several different sources of information and on different strategies of sensory-motor coordination. What are exactly the sources of spatio-temporal information and what are the control strategies remain controversial issues. Indeed, these topics have been the battlefield of contrasting views on how the brain interprets visual information to guide movement. Here we attempt a synthetic overview of the vast literature on interception. We discuss in detail the behavioral and neurophysiological aspects of interception of targets falling under gravity, as this topic has received special attention in recent years. We show that visual cues alone are insufficient to predict the time and place of interception or avoidance, and they need to be supplemented by prior knowledge (or internal models) about several features of the dynamic interaction with the moving object.

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Optometry and Vision Science
                Optom Vis Sci
                Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
                1538-9235
                1040-5488
                2021
                July 2021
                July 12 2021
                : 98
                : 7
                : 750-758
                Article
                10.1097/OPX.0000000000001721
                34328453
                cdced272-28ab-4d74-b33d-510b3cd810ea
                © 2021
                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log