For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
9
views
2
references
 Top references
cited by
1
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      37
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Erratum to: A four-part working bibliography of neuroethics: Part 4 - Ethical issues in clinical and social applications of neuroscience

      correction

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          After the publication of this article [1] it has come to our attention that the following quote from the article by Lombera and Illes [2] “…must have the power — defined by quality of knowledge and ease of access — to help shape that future.”.. was missing a reference citation in the introduction. The omission of the reference citation for this quote was the result of an error during the production process, and not an omission by, and/or error of the authors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references2

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The international dimensions of neuroethics.

          Sofia Lombera, Judy Illes (2009)
          Neuroethics, in its modern form, investigates the impact of brain science in four basic dimensions: the self, social policy, practice and discourse. In this study, we analyzed a set of 461 peer-reviewed articles with neuroethics content, published by authors from 32 countries. We analyzed the data for: (1) trends in the development of international neuroethics over time, and (2) how challenges at the intersection of ethics and neuroscience are viewed in countries that are considered developed by International Monetary Fund (IMF) standards, and in those that are developing. Our results demonstrate a steady increase in global participation in neuroethics from 1989 to 2005, characterized by an increase in numbers of articles published specifically on neuroethics, journals publishing these articles, and countries contributing to the literature. The focus from all countries was on the practice of brain science and the amelioration of neurological disease. Indicators of technology creation and diffusion in developing countries were specifically correlated with increases in publications concerning policy implications of brain science. Neuroethics is an international endeavor and, as such, should be sensitive to the impact that context has on acceptance and use of technological innovation.
          Article 0 comments Cited 10 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            A four-part working bibliography of neuroethics: Part 4 - Ethical issues in clinical and social applications of neuroscience

            Kira Becker, John Shook, Martina Darragh … (2017)
            Background As a discipline, neuroethics addresses a range of questions and issues generated by basic neuroscientific research (inclusive of studies of putative neurobiological processes involved in moral and ethical cognition and behavior), and its use and meanings in the clinical and social spheres. Here, we present Part 4 of a four-part bibliography of the neuroethics literature focusing on clinical and social applications of neuroscience, to include: the treatment-enhancement discourse; issues arising in neurology, psychiatry, and pain care; neuroethics education and training; neuroethics and the law; neuroethics and policy and political issues; international neuroethics; and discourses addressing "trans-" and "post-" humanity. Methods To complete a systematic survey of the literature, 19 databases and 4 individual open-access journals were employed. Searches were conducted using the indexing language of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (NLM). A Python code was used to eliminate duplications in the final bibliography. Results When taken with Parts 1-3, this bibliography aims to provide a listing of international peerreviewed papers, books, and book chapters published from 2002 through 2016. While seeking to be as comprehensive as possible, it may be that some works were inadvertently and unintentionally not included. We therefore invite commentary from the field to afford completeness and contribute to this bibliography as a participatory work-in-progress.
            Article 0 comments Cited 3 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              All references

              Author and article information

              Contributors
              James Giordano: james.giordano@georgetown.edu
              Journal
              Journal ID (nlm-ta): Philos Ethics Humanit Med
              Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Philos Ethics Humanit Med
              Title: Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine : PEHM
              Publisher: BioMed Central (London )
              ISSN (Electronic): 1747-5341
              Publication date (Electronic): 28 June 2017
              Publication date PMC-release: 28 June 2017
              Publication date Collection: 2017
              Volume: 12
              Electronic Location Identifier: 2
              Affiliations
              [1 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7320, GRID grid.252152.3, Department of Neuroscience, , Amherst College, ; Amherst, MA USA
              [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9887, GRID grid.273335.3, Department of Philosophy, , University of Buffalo, ; Buffalo, NY USA
              [3 ]ISNI 0000 0001 1955 1644, GRID grid.213910.8, Bioethics Research Library, Kennedy Institute of Ethics, , Georgetown University, ; Washington, DC USA
              [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2186 0438, GRID grid.411667.3, Neuroethics Studies Program, Pellegrino Center for Clinical Bioethics, and Department of Neurology, , Georgetown University Medical Center, ; Washington, DC USA
              Article
              Publisher ID: 44
              DOI: 10.1186/s13010-017-0044-x
              PMC ID: 5488339
              PubMed ID: 28659145
              SO-VID: cdfbb160-3aed-4f7b-b5a0-217edbc825b0
              Copyright © © The Author(s). 2017
              License:

              Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

              History
              Date received : 12 June 2017
              Date accepted : 20 June 2017
              Related
              Categories
              Subject: Erratum
              Custom metadata
              issue-copyright-statement © The Author(s) 2017

              ScienceOpen disciplines: Philosophy of science
              Data availability:
              ScienceOpen disciplines: Philosophy of science

              Comments

              Comment on this article