For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
6
views
35
references
 Top references
cited by
5
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      168
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      General rather than specific: Cognitive deficits in suppressing task irrelevant stimuli are associated with buying-shopping disorder

      research-article
      Author(s): 1 , 2 , 3 , *
      Editor(s):
      Publication date (Electronic):
      Journal: PLoS ONE
      Publisher: Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To investigate associations between buying-shopping disorder (BSD) propensity and the performance in the Stroop Matching Task. This task measures stimulus interference, one specific component of behavioral impulsivity, using neutral (i.e. not buying related) stimuli. Deficits thus mirror a general rather than a specific deficit to resist task-irrelevant stimuli.

          Method

          222 participants completed the Stroop Matching Task, the Pathological Buying Screener, and various questionnaires assessing clinical background variables as well as trait-impulsivity.

          Results

          Correlation analyses showed that BSD propensity was associated with poorer performance in the Stroop Matching Task. Multiple regression analyses controlling for related disorders and trait-impulsivity indicated that BSD was the only significant predictor.

          Conclusion

          These findings indicate that BSD propensity is associated with deficits in the stimulus interference component of behavioral impulsivity, mirroring a general cognitive deficit. Since no other disorder significantly predicted the performance in the Stroop Matching Task, this deficit seems to be unique for BSD.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: development and validation of a short version.

          Edna B. Foa, Jonathan D Huppert, Susanne Leiberg … (2002)
          This article reports on the development of a revised version of the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory (OCI; E. B. Foa, M. J. Kozak, P. Salkovskis, M. E. Coles, & N. Amir, 1998), a psychometrically sound, theoretically driven, self-report measure. The revised OCI (OCI-R) improves on the parent version in 3 ways: It eliminates the redundant frequency scale, simplifies the scoring of the subscales, and reduces overlap across subscales. The reliability and validity of the OCI-R were examined in 215 patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), 243 patients with other anxiety disorders, and 677 nonanxious individuals. The OCI-R, which contains 18 items and 6 subscales, has retained excellent psychometric properties. The OCI-R and its subscales differentiated well between individuals with and without OCD. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses demonstrated the usefulness of the OCI-R as a diagnostic tool for screening patients with OCD, utilizing empirically derived cutscores.
          Article 0 comments Cited 337 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The short version of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23): development and initial data on psychometric properties.

            Alexandra Philipsen, Erika L Chapman, Melanie Domsalla … (2008)
            The full version of the Borderline Symptom List (BSL; for clarification now labeled BSL-95) is a self-rating instrument for specific assessment of borderline-typical symptomatology. The BSL-95 items are based on criteria of the DSM-IV, the revised version of the Diagnostic Interview for Borderline Personality Disorder, and the opinions of both clinical experts and borderline patients. The BSL-95 includes 95 items. In order to reduce patient burden and assessment time, a short version with 23 items (BSL-23) was developed. The development of the BSL-23 was based on a sample of 379 borderline patients, considering the items from the BSL-95 that had the highest levels of sensitivity to change and the highest ability to discriminate borderline patients from other patient groups. In a second step, the psychometric properties of the BSL-23 were investigated and compared with the psychometric properties of the BSL-95 in 5 different samples, including a total of 659 borderline patients. In all of the samples, a high correlation of the sum score was found between the BSL-23 and the BSL-95 (range: 0.958-0.963). The internal consistency was high for both versions (BSL-23/Cronbach's alpha: 0.935-0.969; BSL-95/Cronbach's alpha: 0.977-0.978). Both BSL-23 and BSL-95 clearly discriminated borderline personality disorder patients from patients with an axis I diagnosis (mean effect sizes were 1.13 and 0.96 for the BSL-23 and BSL-95, respectively). In addition, comparisons before and after 3 months of dialectical behavior therapy revealed a numerically larger effect size for the BSL-23 (d = 0.47) compared to the BSL-95 (d = 0.38). The results indicate that the BSL-23 is an efficient and convenient self-rating instrument that displays good psychometric properties comparable to those of the BSL-95. The BSL-23 also demonstrated sensitivity to the effects of therapy. (c) 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel.
            Article 0 comments Cited 164 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measurement of constructs using self-report and behavioral lab tasks: is there overlap in nomothetic span and construct representation for impulsivity?

              Melissa A Cyders, Ayca Coskunpinar (2011)
              There has been little empirical evidence examining the overlap in nomothetic span for self-report measures and construct representation for behavioral lab tasks in most psychological constructs. Using the personality trait of impulsivity as an example, the authors completed a meta-analysis of 27 published research studies examining the relationship between these methods. In general, although there is a statistically significant relationship between multidimensional self-report and lab task impulsivity (r = 0.097), practically, the relationship is small. Examining relationships among unidimensional impulsivity self-report and lab task conceptualizations indicated very little overlap in self-report and behavioral lab task constructs. Significant relationships were found between lack of perseverance and prepotent response inhibition (r = 0.099); between lack of planning and prepotent response inhibition (r = 0.106), delay response (r = 0.134), and distortions in elapsed time (r = 0.104); between negative urgency and prepotent response inhibition (r = 0.106); and between sensation seeking and delay response (r = 0.131). Researchers should take care to specify which particular unidimensional constructs are operationalized with not only impulsivity, but with all traits. If self-report and lab task conceptualizations measure disparate aspects of impulsivity, we, as a field, should not expect large conceptual overlap between these methods. Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
              Article 0 comments Cited 114 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Nico Lindheimer:
                ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-3272
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draft
                Jennifer Nicolai: Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Morten Moshagen:
                ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-7288
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: SoftwareRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Matthew J. Gullo: Role: Editor
                Journal
                Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
                Journal ID (iso-abbrev): PLoS ONE
                Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
                Journal ID (pmc): plosone
                Title: PLoS ONE
                Publisher: Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                ISSN (Electronic): 1932-6203
                Publication date (Electronic): 4 August 2020
                Publication date Collection: 2020
                Volume: 15
                Issue: 8
                Electronic Location Identifier: e0237093
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
                [2 ] Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
                [3 ] Psychological Research Methods, Department of Psychology, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany
                University of Queensland, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2227-3272
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2929-7288
                Article
                Publisher ID: PONE-D-20-04126
                DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237093
                PMC ID: 7402500
                PubMed ID: 32750087
                SO-VID: ce20bf25-72b1-4906-b1a4-c3ae1623d93b
                Copyright © © 2020 Lindheimer et al
                License:

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                Date received : 12 February 2020
                Date accepted : 20 July 2020
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 2, Pages: 12
                Funding
                The author(s) received no specific funding for this work.
                Categories
                Subject: Research Article
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Personality
                Subject: Personality Traits
                Subject: Impulsivity
                Subject: Social Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Personality
                Subject: Personality Traits
                Subject: Impulsivity
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Behavior
                Subject: Social Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Behavior
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Addiction
                Subject: Behavioral Addiction
                Subject: Social Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Addiction
                Subject: Behavioral Addiction
                Subject: Medicine and Health Sciences
                Subject: Epidemiology
                Subject: Medical Risk Factors
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Neuroscience
                Subject: Cognitive Science
                Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience
                Subject: Cognitive Neurology
                Subject: Cognitive Impairment
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Neuroscience
                Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience
                Subject: Cognitive Neurology
                Subject: Cognitive Impairment
                Subject: Medicine and Health Sciences
                Subject: Neurology
                Subject: Cognitive Neurology
                Subject: Cognitive Impairment
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Addiction
                Subject: Alcoholism
                Subject: Social Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Addiction
                Subject: Alcoholism
                Subject: Medicine and Health Sciences
                Subject: Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Subject: Substance-Related Disorders
                Subject: Alcoholism
                Subject: Medicine and Health Sciences
                Subject: Public and Occupational Health
                Subject: Substance-Related Disorders
                Subject: Alcoholism
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Neuroscience
                Subject: Cognitive Science
                Subject: Cognitive Psychology
                Subject: Decision Making
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Cognitive Psychology
                Subject: Decision Making
                Subject: Social Sciences
                Subject: Psychology
                Subject: Cognitive Psychology
                Subject: Decision Making
                Subject: Biology and Life Sciences
                Subject: Neuroscience
                Subject: Cognitive Science
                Subject: Cognition
                Subject: Decision Making
                Subject: Computer and Information Sciences
                Subject: Computer Networks
                Subject: Internet
                Custom metadata
                Data Availability The complete data file can be found in the following repository: https://osf.io/fgcvs

                ScienceOpen disciplines: Uncategorized
                Data availability:
                ScienceOpen disciplines: Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content168

                See all similar

                Cited by5

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors459

                See all reference authors