5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Integrating approaches for quality guideline development in LactaMap, an online lactation care support system

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Health professionals caring for women and infants experiencing difficulty with breastfeeding have reported deficiencies in evidence-based lactation knowledge. LactaMap is an online lactation care support system with more than 100 clinical practice guidelines to support breastfeeding care. Clinical practice guidelines support medical decision-making by summarising scientific evidence into systematically developed statements for specific clinical circumstances. Both common-sense and theory-based approaches have been used for guideline development and debate continues regarding which is superior. LactaMap clinical practice guidelines were created over the course of 5 years using a common-sense approach that was refined inductively. The aim of this study was to incorporate a theory-based framework approach into the methodology for ongoing update and review of LactaMap clinical practice guidelines.

          Methods

          The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument was chosen as the framework-based approach to appraise LactaMap guideline quality. The study was conducted in two phases. The first phase appraised all 103 original LactaMap guidelines. The second phase appraised a subset of 15 updated LactaMap guidelines using improved methodology guided by phase 1, as well as 15 corresponding original (un-updated) guidelines.

          Results

          Mean Domain scores for 103 LactaMap original guidelines were above 75% in 3 of the 6 AGREE II quality Domains and no mean Domain score rated poorly. Update of guideline methodology was guided by phase 1 appraisals. Improved documentation of methods relating to questions in the Rigour of Development Domain resulted in improvement in mean Domain score from 39 to 72%.

          Conclusions

          This study showed that a theory-based approach to guideline development methodology can be readily integrated with a common-sense approach. Factors identified by AGREE II theory-based framework provided practical guidance for changes in methodology that were integrated prior to LactaMap website publication. Demonstration of high quality in LactaMap clinical practice guideline methodology ensures clinicians and the public can have trust that the content founded on them is robust, scientific and of highest possible quality.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks

            Background Implementation science has progressed towards increased use of theoretical approaches to provide better understanding and explanation of how and why implementation succeeds or fails. The aim of this article is to propose a taxonomy that distinguishes between different categories of theories, models and frameworks in implementation science, to facilitate appropriate selection and application of relevant approaches in implementation research and practice and to foster cross-disciplinary dialogue among implementation researchers. Discussion Theoretical approaches used in implementation science have three overarching aims: describing and/or guiding the process of translating research into practice (process models); understanding and/or explaining what influences implementation outcomes (determinant frameworks, classic theories, implementation theories); and evaluating implementation (evaluation frameworks). Summary This article proposes five categories of theoretical approaches to achieve three overarching aims. These categories are not always recognized as separate types of approaches in the literature. While there is overlap between some of the theories, models and frameworks, awareness of the differences is important to facilitate the selection of relevant approaches. Most determinant frameworks provide limited “how-to” support for carrying out implementation endeavours since the determinants usually are too generic to provide sufficient detail for guiding an implementation process. And while the relevance of addressing barriers and enablers to translating research into practice is mentioned in many process models, these models do not identify or systematically structure specific determinants associated with implementation success. Furthermore, process models recognize a temporal sequence of implementation endeavours, whereas determinant frameworks do not explicitly take a process perspective of implementation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients' care

              The Lancet, 362(9391), 1225-1230
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Melinda.boss@uwa.edu.au
                Jennifer.a.turner@uwa.edu.au
                patboss@iinet.net.au
                Peter.hartmann@uwa.edu.au
                Douglas.pritchard@uwa.edu.au
                Rhonda.clifford@uwa.edu.au
                Journal
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy Childbirth
                BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2393
                23 April 2021
                23 April 2021
                2021
                : 21
                : 322
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.1012.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7910, School of Allied Health, , The University of Western Australia, ; Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia
                [2 ]GRID grid.457375.7, ISNI 0000 0004 0611 8771, PEB Consulting Pty Ltd, ; 69 Federation St, Mount Hawthorn, Western Australia 6016 Australia
                [3 ]GRID grid.1012.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7910, School of Molecular Sciences, , The University of Western Australia, ; Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia
                [4 ]GRID grid.1012.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7910, School of Medicine, , The University of Western Australia, ; Crawley, Western Australia 6009 Australia
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3024-9651
                Article
                3775
                10.1186/s12884-021-03775-9
                8063164
                33892640
                ce4e4522-c84e-419c-9087-6d07c8f7e7fc
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 30 September 2020
                : 5 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100013323, Family Larsson‐Rosenquist Foundation;
                Funded by: Australian Government Research Training Program Scholarship
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                lactation,breastfeeding,clinical practice guidelines (cpgs),agree ii
                Obstetrics & Gynecology
                lactation, breastfeeding, clinical practice guidelines (cpgs), agree ii

                Comments

                Comment on this article