6
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Clinical features, tumor biology, and prognosis associated with MYC rearrangement and Myc overexpression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients treated with rituximab-CHOP.

      1 , 2 , 1 , 1 , 3 , 4 , 1 , 3 , 1 , 5 , 6 , 1 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 1 , 1 , 22 , 1 , 1 , 23
      Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
      Springer Nature

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          MYC dysregulation, including MYC gene rearrangement and Myc protein overexpression, is of increasing clinical importance in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, the roles of MYC and the relative importance of rearrangement vs overexpression remain to be refined. Gaining knowledge about the tumor biology associated with MYC dysregulation is important to understand the roles of MYC and MYC-associated biology in lymphomagenesis. In this study, we determined MYC rearrangement status (n=344) and Myc expression (n=535) in a well-characterized DLBCL cohort, individually assessed the clinical and pathobiological features of patients with MYC rearrangement and Myc protein overexpression, and analyzed the prognosis and gene expression profiling signatures associated with these MYC abnormalities in germinal center B-cell-like and activated B-cell-like DLBCL. Our results showed that the prognostic importance of MYC rearrangement vs Myc overexpression is significantly different in germinal center B-cell-like vs activated B-cell-like DLBCL. In germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL, MYC-rearranged germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL patients with Myc overexpression significantly contributed to the clinical, biological, and prognostic characteristics of the overall Myc-overexpressing germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL group. In contrast, in activated B-cell-like DLBCL, the occurrence, clinical and biological features, and prognosis of Myc overexpression were independent of MYC rearrangement. High Myc levels and Myc-independent mechanisms, either tumor cell intrinsic or related to tumor microenvironment, conferred significantly worse survival to MYC-rearranged germinal center B-cell-like DLBCL patients, even among Myc(high)Bcl-2(high) DLBCL patients. This study provides new insight into the tumor biology and prognostic effects associated with MYC dysregulation and suggest that detection of both MYC translocations and evaluation of Myc and Bcl-2 expression is necessary to predict the prognosis of DLBCL patients.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Mod. Pathol.
          Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc
          Springer Nature
          1530-0285
          0893-3952
          Dec 2015
          : 28
          : 12
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
          [2 ] Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
          [3 ] Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
          [4 ] University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland.
          [5 ] San Bortolo Hospital, Vicenza, Italy.
          [6 ] Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
          [7 ] Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
          [8 ] Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.
          [9 ] The Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA.
          [10 ] Columbia University Medical Center and New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
          [11 ] University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
          [12 ] Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
          [13 ] University of Hong Kong Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, Hong Kong, China.
          [14 ] Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
          [15 ] Asan Medical Center, Ulsan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
          [16 ] San Raffaele H Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
          [17 ] Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
          [18 ] Gundersen Lutheran Health System, La Crosse, WI, USA.
          [19 ] Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Second University Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
          [20 ] Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
          [21 ] Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Santander, Spain.
          [22 ] Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
          [23 ] The University of Texas School of Medicine, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX, USA.
          Article
          modpathol2015118
          10.1038/modpathol.2015.118
          26541272
          ce61f277-f6b6-48eb-b946-e7d9b724bfc7
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article