7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The role of previously undocumented data in the assessment of medical trainees in clinical competency committees

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The clinical competency committee (CCC) comprises a group of clinical faculty tasked with assessing a medical trainee’s progress from multiple data sources. The use of previously undocumented data, or PUD, during CCC deliberations remains controversial. This study explored the use of previously undocumented data in conjunction with documented data in creating a meaningful assessment in a CCC.

          Methods

          An instrumental case study of a CCC that uses previously undocumented data was conducted. A single CCC meeting was observed, followed by semi-structured individual interviews with all CCC members ( n = 7). Meeting and interview transcripts were analyzed iteratively.

          Results

          Documented data were perceived as limited by inaccurate or superficial data, but sometimes served as a starting point for invoking previously undocumented data. Previously undocumented data were introduced as summary impressions, contextualizing factors, personal anecdotes and, rarely, hearsay. The purpose was to raise a potential issue for discussion, enhance and elaborate an impression, or counter an impression. Various mechanisms allowed for the responsible use of previously undocumented data: embedding these data within a structured format; sharing relevant information without commenting beyond one’s scope of experience; clarifying allowable disclosure of personal contextual factors with the trainee pre-meeting; excluding previously undocumented data not widely agreed upon in decision-making; and expecting these data to have been provided as direct feedback to trainees pre-meeting.

          Discussion

          Previously undocumented data appear to play a vital part of the group conversation in a CCC to create meaningful, developmentally focused trainee assessments that cannot be achieved by documented data alone. Consideration should be given to ensuring the thoughtful incorporation of previously undocumented data as an essential part of the CCC assessment process.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1007/s40037-020-00624-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references23

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Failure to fail: the perspectives of clinical supervisors.

          Clinical supervisors often do not fail students and residents even though they have judged their performance to be unsatisfactory. This study explored the factors identified by supervisors that affect their willingness to report poor clinical performance when completing In-Training Evaluation Reports (ITERs). Semistructured interviews with 21 clinical supervisors at the University of Ottawa were conducted and qualitatively analyzed. Participants identified four major areas of the evaluation process that act as barriers to reporting a trainee who has performed poorly: (1) lack of documentation, (2) lack of knowledge of what to specifically document, (3) anticipating an appeal process and (4) lack of remediation options. The study provides insight as to why supervisors fail to fail the poorly performing student and resident. It also offers suggestions of how to support supervisors, increasing the likelihood that they will provide a valid ITER when faced with an underachieving trainee.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Reading between the lines: faculty interpretations of narrative evaluation comments.

              Narrative comments are used routinely in many forms of rater-based assessment. Interpretation can be difficult as a result of idiosyncratic writing styles and disconnects between literal and intended meanings. Our purpose was to explore how faculty attendings interpret and make sense of the narrative comments on residents' in-training evaluation reports (ITERs) and to determine the language cues that appear to be influential in generating and justifying their interpretations.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jennifer.tam@cw.bc.ca
                Journal
                Perspect Med Educ
                Perspect Med Educ
                Perspectives on Medical Education
                Bohn Stafleu van Loghum (Houten )
                2212-2761
                2212-277X
                6 October 2020
                6 October 2020
                October 2020
                : 9
                : 5
                : 286-293
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Centre for Health Education Scholarship, Faculty of Medicine, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
                [2 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
                [3 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, Ontario Canada
                [4 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Wilson Centre for Research in Education, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [5 ]GRID grid.17063.33, ISNI 0000 0001 2157 2938, Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, , University of Toronto, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [6 ]GRID grid.42327.30, ISNI 0000 0004 0473 9646, Department of Paediatrics, , The Hospital for Sick Children, ; Toronto, ON Canada
                [7 ]GRID grid.17091.3e, ISNI 0000 0001 2288 9830, Department of Surgery, , University of British Columbia, ; Vancouver, British Columbia Canada
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0341-9555
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2531-3156
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3144-331X
                Article
                624
                10.1007/s40037-020-00624-x
                7550499
                33025382
                ce736992-719b-4738-9092-110e764ff03d
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 23 February 2020
                : 26 September 2020
                : 28 September 2020
                Categories
                Original Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2020

                Education
                clinical competence committees,undocumented data,data management,group decision-making,competency-based medical education

                Comments

                Comment on this article