27
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interaction between polymorphisms in aspirin metabolic pathways, regular aspirin use and colorectal cancer risk: A case-control study in unselected white European populations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Regular aspirin use is associated with reduced risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). Variation in aspirin’s chemoprevention efficacy has been attributed to the presence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). We conducted a meta-analysis using two large population-based case-control datasets, the UK-Leeds Colorectal Cancer Study Group and the NIH-Colon Cancer Family Registry, having a combined total of 3325 cases and 2262 controls. The aim was to assess 42 candidate SNPs in 15 genes whose association with colorectal cancer risk was putatively modified by aspirin use, in the literature. Log odds ratios (ORs) and standard errors were estimated for each dataset separately using logistic regression adjusting for age, sex and study site, and dataset-specific results were combined using random effects meta-analysis. Meta-analysis showed association between SNPs rs6983267, rs11694911 and rs2302615 with CRC risk reduction (All P<0.05). Association for SNP rs6983267 in the CCAT2 gene only was noteworthy after multiple test correction ( P = 0.001). Site-specific analysis showed association between SNPs rs1799853 and rs2302615 with reduced colon cancer risk only ( P = 0.01 and P = 0.004, respectively), however neither reached significance threshold following multiple test correction. Meta-analysis of SNPs rs2070959 and rs1105879 in UGT1A6 gene showed interaction between aspirin use and CRC risk ( P interaction = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively); stratification by aspirin use showed an association for decreased CRC risk for aspirin users having a wild-type genotype (rs2070959 OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.68–0.86; rs1105879 OR = 0.77 95% CI = 0.69–0.86) compared to variant allele cariers. The direction of the interaction however is in contrast to that published in studies on colorectal adenomas. Both SNPs showed potential site-specific interaction with aspirin use and colon cancer risk only ( P interaction = 0.006 and 0.008, respectively), with the direction of association similar to that observed for CRC. Additionally, they showed interaction between any non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (including aspirin) use and CRC risk ( P interaction = 0.01 for both). All gene x environment (GxE) interactions however were not significant after multiple test correction. Candidate gene investigation indicated no evidence of GxE interaction between genetic variants in genes involved in aspirin pathways, regular aspirin use and colorectal cancer risk.

          Related collections

          Most cited references34

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Genome-wide association scan identifies a colorectal cancer susceptibility locus on 11q23 and replicates risk loci at 8q24 and 18q21.

          In a genome-wide association study to identify loci associated with colorectal cancer (CRC) risk, we genotyped 555,510 SNPs in 1,012 early-onset Scottish CRC cases and 1,012 controls (phase 1). In phase 2, we genotyped the 15,008 highest-ranked SNPs in 2,057 Scottish cases and 2,111 controls. We then genotyped the five highest-ranked SNPs from the joint phase 1 and 2 analysis in 14,500 cases and 13,294 controls from seven populations, and identified a previously unreported association, rs3802842 on 11q23 (OR = 1.1; P = 5.8 x 10(-10)), showing population differences in risk. We also replicated and fine-mapped associations at 8q24 (rs7014346; OR = 1.19; P = 8.6 x 10(-26)) and 18q21 (rs4939827; OR = 1.2; P = 7.8 x 10(-28)). Risk was greater for rectal than for colon cancer for rs3802842 (P < 0.008) and rs4939827 (P < 0.009). Carrying all six possible risk alleles yielded OR = 2.6 (95% CI = 1.75-3.89) for CRC. These findings extend our understanding of the role of common genetic variation in CRC etiology.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Colon Cancer Family Registry: an international resource for studies of the genetic epidemiology of colon cancer.

            Family studies have served as a cornerstone of genetic research on colorectal cancer. The Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (Colon CFR) is an international consortium of six centers in North America and Australia formed as a resource to support studies on the etiology, prevention, and clinical management of colorectal cancer. Differences in design and sampling schemes ensures a resource that covers the continuum of disease risk. Two separate recruitment strategies identified colorectal cancer cases: population-based (incident case probands identified by cancer registries; all six centers) and clinic-based (families with multiple cases of colorectal cancer presenting at cancer family clinics; three centers). At this time, the Colon CFR is in year 10 with the second phase of enrollment nearly complete. In phase I recruitment (1998-2002), population-based sampling ranged from all incident cases of colorectal cancer to a subsample based on age at diagnosis and/or family cancer history. During phase II (2002-2007), population-based recruitment targeted cases diagnosed before the age of 50 years are more likely attributable to genetic factors. Standardized protocols were used to collect information regarding family cancer history and colorectal cancer risk factors, and biospecimens were obtained to assess microsatellite instability (MSI) status, expression of mismatch repair proteins, and other molecular and genetic processes. Of the 8,369 case probands enrolled to date, 2,602 reported having one or more colorectal cancer-affected relatives and 799 met the Amsterdam I criteria for Lynch syndrome. A large number of affected (1,324) and unaffected (19,816) relatives were enrolled, as were population-based (4,108) and spouse (983) controls. To date, 91% of case probands provided blood (or, for a few, buccal cell) samples and 75% provided tumor tissue. For a selected sample of high-risk subjects, lymphocytes have been immortalized. Nearly 600 case probands had more than two affected colorectal cancer relatives, and 800 meeting the Amsterdam I criteria and 128, the Amsterdam II criteria. MSI testing for 10 markers was attempted on all obtained tumors. Of the 4,011 tumors collected in phase I that were successfully tested, 16% were MSI-high, 12% were MSI-low, and 72% were microsatellite stable. Tumor tissues from clinic-based cases were twice as likely as population-based cases to be MSI-high (34% versus 17%). Seventeen percent of phase I proband tumors and 24% of phase II proband tumors had some loss of mismatch repair protein, with the prevalence depending on sampling. Active follow-up to update personal and family histories, new neoplasms, and deaths in probands and relatives is nearly complete. The Colon CFR supports an evolving research program that is broad and interdisciplinary. The greater scientific community has access to this large and well-characterized resource for studies of colorectal cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Epigenetics and Colorectal Cancer Pathogenesis

              Colorectal cancer (CRC) develops through a multistage process that results from the progressive accumulation of genetic mutations, and frequently as a result of mutations in the Wnt signaling pathway. However, it has become evident over the past two decades that epigenetic alterations of the chromatin, particularly the chromatin components in the promoter regions of tumor suppressors and oncogenes, play key roles in CRC pathogenesis. Epigenetic regulation is organized at multiple levels, involving primarily DNA methylation and selective histone modifications in cancer cells. Assessment of the CRC epigenome has revealed that virtually all CRCs have aberrantly methylated genes and that the average CRC methylome has thousands of abnormally methylated genes. Although relatively less is known about the patterns of specific histone modifications in CRC, selective histone modifications and resultant chromatin conformation have been shown to act, in concert with DNA methylation, to regulate gene expression to mediate CRC pathogenesis. Moreover, it is now clear that not only DNA methylation but also histone modifications are reversible processes. The increased understanding of epigenetic regulation of gene expression in the context of CRC pathogenesis has led to development of epigenetic biomarkers for CRC diagnosis and epigenetic drugs for CRC therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: Project administrationRole: Supervision
                Role: Formal analysisRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: Supervision
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Project administrationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: MethodologyRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Resources
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisition
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                9 February 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 2
                : e0192223
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
                [2 ] Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
                [3 ] Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
                [4 ] Institute of Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
                [5 ] School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom
                [6 ] Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California, United States of America
                [7 ] Center for Public Health Genomics, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, United States of America
                [8 ] Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Australia
                [9 ] University of Hawaii, Manoa, Hawaii, United States of America
                [10 ] Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
                [11 ] Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
                [12 ] Centre for Public Health Research, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand
                National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, UNITED STATES
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: John Burn and Cornelia M. Ulrich are consultant/advisory board member of Bayer Pharma who manufacture aspirin. Other authors have declared that no competing interest exist. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9626-0971
                Article
                PONE-D-17-10794
                10.1371/journal.pone.0192223
                5806861
                29425227
                ce872e1f-853d-4b6c-8861-df4f6ad35bd1
                © 2018 Sheth et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 17 May 2017
                : 19 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 1, Pages: 17
                Funding
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: U01 CA122839 and R01 CA143237
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: National Cancer Institute
                Award ID: U01/U24 CA074783 and U01/U24 CA074794
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000289, Cancer Research UK;
                Award ID: C588/A19167
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: UM1 CA167551-NIH-CCFR
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054, National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: U01 CA074778 and U01/U24 CA097735
                The UK-CCSG study was supported by the Cancer Research UK grant C588/A19167. The NIH-CCFR study was supported by grant UM1 CA167551 from the National Cancer Institute and through cooperative agreements with the following CCFR centers: Australasian Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (U01 CA074778 and U01/U24 CA097735), Ontario Familial Colorectal Cancer Registry (U01/U24 CA074783) and Seattle Colorectal Cancer Family Registry (U01/U24 CA074794). The Colon CFR Illumina GWAS was supported by funding from the National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health (U01 CA122839 and R01 CA143237 to Graham Casey). The content of this manuscript does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Cancer Institute or any of the collaborating centres in the Colon Cancer Family Registry (CCFR), nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the US Government or the CCFR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Colorectal Cancer
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Genetic Loci
                Alleles
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Meta-Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics (Mathematics)
                Statistical Methods
                Meta-Analysis
                Medicine and health sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drugs
                Analgesics
                NSAIDs
                Medicine and health sciences
                Pain management
                Analgesics
                NSAIDs
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Molecular Genetics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Molecular Biology
                Molecular Genetics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Adenomas
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Genetics
                Heredity
                Genetic Mapping
                Variant Genotypes
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Oncology
                Cancers and Neoplasms
                Gastrointestinal Tumors
                Rectal Cancer
                Custom metadata
                Anonymized UK-CCSG data are available in the Supporting Information files. The original UK-CCSG data are available at request from D. Timothy Bishop (email: D.T.Bishop@ 123456leeds.ac.uk ). The NIH-CCFR data are available at request from Allyson Templeton (email: atemplet@ 123456fredhutch.org ). Others would be able to access these data in the same manner as the authors and the authors did not have any special access privileges that others would not have.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article