3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Blood glucose response after oral lactulose intake in type 2 diabetic individuals

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          BACKGROUND

          Lactulose is approved for the symptomatic treatment of constipation, a gastrointestinal (GI) complication common in individuals with diabetes. Lactulose products contain carbohydrate impurities ( e.g., lactose, fructose, galactose), which occur during the lactulose manufacturing process. These impurities may affect the blood glucose levels of individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) using lactulose for the treatment of mild constipation. A previous study in healthy subjects revealed no increase in blood glucose levels after oral lactulose intake. However, it is still unclear whether the intake of lactulose increases blood glucose levels in individuals with diabetes.

          AIM

          To evaluate the blood glucose profile after oral lactulose intake in mildly constipated, non-insulin-dependent subjects with T2DM in an outpatient setting.

          METHODS

          This prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled, single-center trial was conducted at the Clinical Research Center at the Medical University of Graz, Austria, in 24 adult Caucasian mildly constipated, non-insulin-dependent subjects with T2DM. Eligible subjects were randomized and assigned to one of six treatment sequences, each consisting of four treatments stratified by sex using an incomplete block design. Subjects received a single dose of 20 g or 30 g lactulose (crystal and liquid formulation), water as negative control or 30 g glucose as positive control. Capillary blood glucose concentrations were measured over a period of 180 min post dose. The primary endpoint was the baseline-corrected area under the curve of blood glucose concentrations over the complete assessment period [AUC baseline_c (0-180 min)]. Quantitative comparisons were performed for both lactulose doses and formulations vs water for the equal lactulose dose vs glucose, as well as for liquid lactulose vs crystal lactulose. Safety parameters included GI tolerability, which was assessed at 180 min and 24 h post dose, and adverse events occurring up to 24 h post dose.

          RESULTS

          In 24 randomized and analyzed subjects blood glucose concentration-time curves after intake of 20 g and 30 g lactulose were almost identical to those after water intake for both lactulose formulations despite the different amounts of carbohydrate impurities (≤ 3.0% for crystals and approx. 30% for liquid). The primary endpoint [AUC baseline_c (0-180 min)] was not significantly different between lactulose and water regardless of lactulose dose and formulation. Also with regard to all secondary endpoints lactulose formulations showed comparable results to water with one exception concerning maximum glucose level. A minor increase in maximum blood glucose was observed after the 30 g dose, liquid lactulose, in comparison to water with a mean treatment difference of 0.63 mmol/L (95% confidence intervals: 0.19, 1.07). Intake of 30 g glucose significantly increased all blood glucose endpoints vs 30 g liquid and crystal lactulose, respectively (all P < 0.0001). No differences in blood glucose response were observed between the different lactulose formulations. As expected, lactulose increased the number of bowel movements and was generally well tolerated. Subjects experienced only mild to moderate GI symptoms due to the laxative action of lactulose.

          CONCLUSION

          Blood glucose AUC baseline_c (0-180 min) levels in mildly constipated, non-insulin dependent subjects with T2DM are not affected by the carbohydrate impurities contained in 20 g and 30 g crystal or liquid lactulose formulations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references29

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standardizing Clinically Meaningful Outcome Measures Beyond HbA 1c for Type 1 Diabetes: A Consensus Report of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange

          OBJECTIVE To identify and define clinically meaningful type 1 diabetes outcomes beyond hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) based upon a review of the evidence, consensus from clinical experts, and input from researchers, people with type 1 diabetes, and industry. Priority outcomes include hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, time in range, diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). While priority outcomes for type 1 and type 2 diabetes may overlap, type 1 diabetes was the focus of this work. RESEARCH AND METHODS A Steering Committee—comprising representatives from the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, the American Diabetes Association, the Endocrine Society, JDRF International, The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, the Pediatric Endocrine Society, and the T1D Exchange—was the decision-making body for the Type 1 Diabetes Outcomes Program. Their work was informed by input from researchers, industry, and people with diabetes through Advisory Committees representing each stakeholder group. Stakeholder surveys were used to identify priority outcomes. The outcomes prioritized in the surveys were hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, time in range, DKA, and PROs. To develop consensus on the definitions of these outcomes, the Steering Committee relied on published evidence, their clinical expertise, and feedback from the Advisory Committees. RESULTS The Steering Committee developed definitions for hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, time in range, and DKA in type 1 diabetes. The definitions reflect their assessment of the outcome’s short- and long-term clinical impact on people with type 1 diabetes. Knowledge gaps to be addressed by future research were identified. The Steering Committee discussed PROs and concluded that further type 1 diabetes–specific development is needed. CONCLUSIONS The Steering Committee recommends use of the defined clinically meaningful outcomes beyond HbA1c in the research, development, and evaluation of type 1 diabetes therapies.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            AACE/ACE comprehensive diabetes management algorithm 2015.

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Defecation frequency and timing, and stool form in the general population: a prospective study.

              Because the range of bowel habits and stool types in the community is unknown we questioned 838 men and 1059 women, comprising 72.2% of a random stratified sample of the East Bristol population. Most of them kept records of three consecutive defecations, including stool form on a validated six point scale ranging from hard, round lumps to mushy. Questionnaire responses agreed moderately well with recorded data. Although the most common bowel habit was once daily this was a minority practice in both sexes; a regular 24 hour cycle was apparent in only 40% of men and 33% of women. Another 7% of men and 4% of women seemed to have a regular twice or thrice daily bowel habit. Thus most people had irregular bowels. A third of women defecated less often than daily and 1% once a week or less. Stools at the constipated end of the scale were passed more often by women than men. In women of child bearing age bowel habit and the spectrum of stool types were shifted towards constipation and irregularity compared with older women and three cases of severe slow transit constipation were discovered in young women. Otherwise age had little effect on bowel habit or stool type. Normal stool types, defined as those least likely to evoke symptoms, accounted for only 56% of all stools in women and 61% in men. Most defecations occurred in the early morning and earlier in men than in women. We conclude that conventionally normal bowel function is enjoyed by less than half the population and that, in this aspect of human physiology, younger women are especially disadvantaged.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                World J Diabetes
                WJD
                World Journal of Diabetes
                Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
                1948-9358
                15 June 2021
                15 June 2021
                : 12
                : 6
                : 893-907
                Affiliations
                Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria
                Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria
                Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria
                Division of Endocrinology and Diabetology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz 8036, Austria
                Department of Statistic, M.A.R.C.O. GmbH & Co. KG, Institute for Clinical Research and Statistics, Düsseldorf 40211, Germany
                Department of Nutritional CRO, BioTeSys GmbH, Esslingen 73728, Germany
                Department of Medical & Clinical Affairs, Market Access & Education Business Unit Enteral Nutrition, Bad Homburg 61352, Germany
                Department of Medical & Clinical Affairs, Market Access & Education Business Unit Enteral Nutrition, Bad Homburg 61352, Germany
                Department of Medical, Clinical & Regulatory Affairs, Business Unit Parenteral Nutrition, Keto-Analogues and Standard I.V. Fluids, Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg 61352, Germany
                Department of Medical, Clinical & Regulatory Affairs, Business Unit Parenteral Nutrition, Keto-Analogues and Standard I.V. Fluids, Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg 61352, Germany. valentin.faerber@ 123456fresenius-kabi.com
                Department of Consultancy, Stover-Solutions, Zurich 8006, Switzerland
                Market Unit Lactulose, Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH, Linz 4020, Austria
                Market Unit Lactulose, Fresenius Kabi Austria GmbH, Linz 4020, Austria
                Author notes

                Author contributions: Pieber TR, Svehlikova E, Mursic I, and Esterl T performed the study, data collection and interpretation; Stover JF, Pauly L, Schwejda-Guettes S, Kuchinka-Koch A, and Gaigg B designed and supervised the study; Wargenau M planned and performed the statistical analysis of the data and interpreted the results; Sartorius T, Neumann A, and Faerber V wrote the manuscript; all authors reviewed, edited, and approved the manuscript for submission.

                Supported by Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Germany.

                Corresponding author: Valentin Faerber, PhD, Director, Department of Medical, Clinical & Regulatory Affairs, Business Unit Parenteral Nutrition, Keto-Analogues and Standard I. V. Fluids, Fresenius Kabi Deutschland GmbH, Else-Kroener-Straße 1, Bad Homburg 61352, Germany. valentin.faerber@ 123456fresenius-kabi.com

                Article
                jWJD.v12.i6.pg893
                10.4239/wjd.v12.i6.893
                8192256
                34168736
                ce9ff5d5-2b67-413c-84aa-c31f230b42df
                ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.

                This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/

                History
                : 3 December 2020
                : 7 April 2021
                : 22 April 2021
                Categories
                Randomized Controlled Trial

                lactulose,constipation,blood glucose,type 2 diabetes mellitus,laxative,sugar substitute

                Comments

                Comment on this article