14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      METTL3 Modulates Osteoclast Differentiation and Function by Controlling RNA Stability and Nuclear Export

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Osteoclast differentiation and function are crucial for maintaining bone homeostasis and preserving skeletal integrity. N6-methyladenosine (m 6A) is an abundant mRNA modification that has recently been shown to be important in regulating cell lineage differentiation. Nevertheless, the effect of m 6A on osteoclast differentiation remains unknown. In the present study, we observed that the m 6A level and methyltransferase METTL3 expression increased during osteoclast differentiation. Mettl3 knockdown resulted in an increased size but a decreased bone-resorbing ability of osteoclasts. The expression of osteoclast-specific genes ( Nfatc1, c-Fos, Ctsk, Acp5 and Dcstamp) was inhibited by Mettl3 depletion, while the expression of the cellular fusion-specific gene Atp6v0d2 was upregulated. Mechanistically, Mettl3 knockdown elevated the mRNA stability of Atp6v0d2 and the same result was obtained when the m 6A-binding protein YTHDF2 was silenced. Moreover, the phosphorylation levels of key molecules in the MAPK, NF-κB and PI3K-AKT signaling pathways were reduced upon Mettl3 deficiency. Depletion of Mettl3 maintained the retention of Traf6 mRNA in the nucleus and reduced the protein levels of TRAF6. Taken together, our data suggest that METTL3 regulates osteoclast differentiation and function through different mechanisms involving Atp6v0d2 mRNA degradation mediated by YTHDF2 and Traf6 mRNA nuclear export. These findings elucidate the molecular basis of RNA epigenetic regulation in osteoclast development.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Osteoblast-osteoclast interactions.

          Bone homeostasis depends on the resorption of bones by osteoclasts and formation of bones by the osteoblasts. Imbalance of this tightly coupled process can cause diseases such as osteoporosis. Thus, the mechanisms that regulate communication between osteoclasts and osteoblasts are critical to bone cell biology. It has been shown that osteoblasts and osteoclasts can communicate with each other through direct cell-cell contact, cytokines, and extracellular matrix interaction. Osteoblasts can affect osteoclast formation, differentiation, or apoptosis through several pathways, such as OPG/RANKL/RANK, RANKL/LGR4/RANK, Ephrin2/ephB4, and Fas/FasL pathways. Conversely, osteoclasts also influence formation of bones by osteoblasts via the d2 isoform of the vacuolar (H+) ATPase (v-ATPase) V0 domain (Atp6v0d2), complement component 3a, semaphorin 4D or microRNAs. In addition, cytokines released from the resorbed bone matrix, such as TGF-β and IGF-1, also affect the activity of osteoblasts. Drugs could be developed by enhancing or restricting some of these interactions. Several reviews have been performed on the osteoblast-osteoclast communication. However, few reviews have shown the research advances in the recent years. In this review, we summarized the current knowledge on osteoblast-osteoclast communication.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Messenger RNA modifications: Form, distribution, and function.

            RNA contains more than 100 distinct modifications that promote the functions of stable noncoding RNAs in translation and splicing. Recent technical advances have revealed widespread and sparse modification of messenger RNAs with N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A), 5-methylcytosine (m(5)C), and pseudouridine (Ψ). Here we discuss the rapidly evolving understanding of the location, regulation, and function of these dynamic mRNA marks, collectively termed the epitranscriptome. We highlight differences among modifications and between species that could instruct ongoing efforts to understand how specific mRNA target sites are selected and how their modification is regulated. Diverse molecular consequences of individual m(6)A modifications are beginning to be revealed, but the effects of m(5)C and Ψ remain largely unknown. Future work linking molecular effects to organismal phenotypes will broaden our understanding of mRNA modifications as cell and developmental regulators.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              m(6)A in mRNA: An Ancient Mechanism for Fine-Tuning Gene Expression.

              Modifications in mRNA constitute ancient mechanisms to regulate gene expression post-transcriptionally. N(6)-methyladenosine (m(6)A) is the most prominent mRNA modification, and is installed by a large methyltransferase complex (the m(6)A 'writer'), not only specifically bound by RNA-binding proteins (the m(6)A 'readers'), but also removed by demethylases (the m(6)A 'erasers'). m(6)A mRNA modifications have been linked to regulation at multiple steps in mRNA processing. In analogy to the regulation of gene expression by miRNAs, we propose that the main function of m(6)A is post-transcriptional fine-tuning of gene expression. In contrast to miRNA regulation, which mostly reduces gene expression, we argue that m(6)A provides a fast mean to post-transcriptionally maximize gene expression. Additionally, m(6)A appears to have a second function during developmental transitions by targeting m(6)A-marked transcripts for degradation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Mol Sci
                Int J Mol Sci
                ijms
                International Journal of Molecular Sciences
                MDPI
                1422-0067
                28 February 2020
                March 2020
                : 21
                : 5
                : 1660
                Affiliations
                Guanghua School of Stomatology & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Sun Yat-sen University, 56 Ling Yuan Xi Road, Guangzhou 510055, China; lidi5@ 123456mail2.sysu.edu.cn (D.L.); cailh6@ 123456mail2.sysu.edu.cn (L.C.); mengrsh@ 123456mail2.sysu.edu.cn (R.M.); fengzhh5@ 123456mail2.sysu.edu.cn (Z.F.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: xqiong@ 123456mail.sysu.edu.cn ; Tel.: +86-2083870507; Fax: +86-2083822807
                [†]

                These authors contributed equally to this work.

                Article
                ijms-21-01660
                10.3390/ijms21051660
                7084668
                32121289
                cebc255e-cc2f-4b5d-afc4-69449771f814
                © 2020 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 16 January 2020
                : 25 February 2020
                Categories
                Article

                Molecular biology
                osteoclast differentiation,n6-methyladenosine,mettl3,mrna stability,nuclear export

                Comments

                Comment on this article