41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    1
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Using concept mapping in the development of the EU-PAD framework (EUropean-Physical Activity Determinants across the life course): a DEDIPAC-study

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 1 , 8 , 6 , 9 , 1 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 9 , 13 , 1 , 14 , 1 , 15 , 1 , 16 , 16 , 1 , 17 , 13 , 7 , 18 , 8 , 10 , 19 , 16 , 13 , 2 , 1 , on behalf of the DEDIPAC consortium
      BMC Public Health
      BioMed Central
      Factors, Active lifestyles, Youth, Adults, Older adults, Priority for research

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          A large proportion of European children, adults and older adults do not engage in sufficient physical activity (PA). Understanding individual and contextual factors associated with PA behaviours is essential for the identification and implementation of effective preventative environments, policies, and programmes that can promote an active lifestyle across life course and can potentially improve health. The current paper intends to provide 1) a multi-disciplinary, Pan-European and life course view of key determinants of PA behaviours and 2) a proposal of how these factors may cluster.

          Methods

          After gathering a list of 183 potential PA behaviours-associated factors and a consensus meeting to unify/consolidate terminology, a concept mapping software was used to collate European experts’ views of 106 identified factors for youth (<19 years), adults (19–64 years), and older adults (≥65 years). The analysis evaluated common trends in the clustering of factors and the ratings of the distinct factors’ expected modifiability and population-level impact on PA behaviours across the life course. Priority for research was also assessed for each cluster.

          Results

          The concept mapping resulted in six distinct clusters, broadly merged in two themes: 1) the ‘Person’, which included clusters ‘Intra-Personal Context and Wellbeing’ and ‘Family and Social Economic Status’ (42 % of all factors) and 2) the ‘Society’, which included the remaining four clusters ‘Policy and Provision’, ‘Cultural Context and Media’, ‘Social Support and Modelling’, and ‘Supportive Environment’ (58 % of all factors). Overall, 25 factors were rated as the most impactful on PA behaviours across the life course and being the most modifiable. They were mostly situated in the ‘Intra-Personal Context and Wellbeing’ cluster. Furthermore, 16 of them were rated as top priority for research.

          Conclusions

          The current framework provides a preliminary overview of factors which may account for PA behaviour across the life course and are most relevant to the European community. These insights could potentially be a foundation for future Pan-European research on how these factors might interact with each other, and assist policy makers to identify appropriate interventions to maximize PA behaviours and thus the health of European citizens.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Use of concept mapping to characterize relationships among implementation strategies and assess their feasibility and importance: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study

          Background Poor terminological consistency for core concepts in implementation science has been widely noted as an obstacle to effective meta-analyses. This inconsistency is also a barrier for those seeking guidance from the research literature when developing and planning implementation initiatives. The Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) study aims to address one area of terminological inconsistency: discrete implementation strategies involving one process or action used to support a practice change. The present report is on the second stage of the ERIC project that focuses on providing initial validation of the compilation of 73 implementation strategies that were identified in the first phase. Findings Purposive sampling was used to recruit a panel of experts in implementation science and clinical practice (N = 35). These key stakeholders used concept mapping sorting and rating activities to place the 73 implementation strategies into similar groups and to rate each strategy’s relative importance and feasibility. Multidimensional scaling analysis provided a quantitative representation of the relationships among the strategies, all but one of which were found to be conceptually distinct from the others. Hierarchical cluster analysis supported organizing the 73 strategies into 9 categories. The ratings data reflect those strategies identified as the most important and feasible. Conclusions This study provides initial validation of the implementation strategies within the ERIC compilation as being conceptually distinct. The categorization and strategy ratings of importance and feasibility may facilitate the search for, and selection of, strategies that are best suited for implementation efforts in a particular setting. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-015-0295-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            An introduction to concept mapping for planning and evaluation

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Toward a Theory of Organizational Culture and Effectiveness

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                +39 0636733255 , giancarlo.condello@gmail.com
                Fiona.Ling@ul.ie
                antoninobianco@unipa.it
                Sebastien.Chastin@gcu.ac.uk
                greet.cardon@ugent.be
                donatella.ciarapica@crea.gov.it
                danieleconte25@gmail.com
                c.cortis@unicas.it
                Marieke.DeCraemer@UGent.be
                andiblasio@gmail.com
                masar.gjaka@uni-pr.edu
                dedipac_ustutt@inspo.uni-stuttgart.de
                michelle.holdsworth@sheffield.ac.uk
                licia.iacoviello@moli-sani.org
                pascalizzicupo@gmail.com
                Lina.Jaeschke@mdc-berlin.de
                leone@cevas.it
                livia.manoni@romascuola.net
                ca.menescardi@ucv.es
                silvia.migliaccio@uniroma4.it
                julie-anne.nazare@cens-nutrition.com
                camille.perchoux@gmail.com
                caterina.pesce@uniroma4.it
                frank.pierik@tno.nl
                tobias.pischon@mdc-berlin.de
                angela.polito@crea.gov.it
                annapuggina@gmail.com
                alessandra.sannella@unicas.it
                wolfgang.schlicht@sport.uni-stuttgart.de
                schulz@helmholtz-muenchen.de
                chantal.simon@univ-lyon1.fr
                Astrid.Steinbrecher@mdc-berlin.de
                Ciaran.MacDonncha@ul.ie
                laura.capranica@uniroma4.it
                Journal
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BMC Public Health
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2458
                9 November 2016
                9 November 2016
                2016
                : 16
                : 1145
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Movement, Human and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, P.za Lauro de Bosis, 15, 00135 Rome, Italy
                [2 ]Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
                [3 ]Institute of Sport, Exercise & Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia
                [4 ]Department of Psychology and Educational Science, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
                [5 ]Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Health and Life Science, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK
                [6 ]Department of Movement and Sports Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
                [7 ]Council for Agricultural Research and Economics -Research Centre for Food and Nutrition, Rome, Italy
                [8 ]Department of Human Sciences, Society, and Health, University of Cassino and Lazio Meridionale, Cassino, Italy
                [9 ]Department of Medicine and Aging Sciences, ‘G. d’Annunzio’ University of Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
                [10 ]Department for Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany
                [11 ]School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR)-Public Health Section, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
                [12 ]Department of Epidemiology and Prevention. IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo: NEUROMED, Pozzilli, Italy
                [13 ]Molecular Epidemiology Group, Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association (MDC), Berlin, Germany
                [14 ]Counselling and Evaluation of Social and Health Policies - CEVAS, Rome, Italy
                [15 ]Department of Applied Sciences in Physical Activity and Management, Catholic University of Valencia “San Vicente Mártir”, Valencia, Spain
                [16 ]Centre de Recherche en Nutrition Humaine Rhône-Alpes, University of Lyon1, Lyon, France
                [17 ]Department of Sustainable Urban Mobility & Safety, Nederlandse Organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek/Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), Utrecht, The Netherlands
                [18 ]Section of Hygiene - Institute of Public Health; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “Agostino Gemelli”, L.go F. Vito, 1-00168 Rome, Italy
                [19 ]Institute of Epidemiology I, Helmholtz Zentrum München, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich/Neuherberg, Germany
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5092-3258
                Article
                3800
                10.1186/s12889-016-3800-8
                5101801
                27825370
                ced08bf0-09de-4cb2-925f-f74ce833183d
                © The Author(s). 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 29 June 2016
                : 1 November 2016
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100003407, Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Università e della Ricerca;
                Award ID: B84G14000040008
                Award ID: 2010KL2Y73
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001590, Health Research Board;
                Funded by: The Medical Research Council (MRC), UK
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100005401, Ministero delle Politiche Agricole Alimentari e Forestali;
                Award ID: 14474/7303/13
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung;
                Award ID: 01EA1372E
                Award ID: 01EA1372C
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100006488, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique;
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001826, ZonMw;
                Award ID: 50-52300-98-003
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Public health
                factors,active lifestyles,youth,adults,older adults,priority for research
                Public health
                factors, active lifestyles, youth, adults, older adults, priority for research

                Comments

                Comment on this article