12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Sensitivity of Pine Island Glacier to observed ocean forcing : PIG response to ocean forcing

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references51

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Book: not found

          The operated Markov´s chains in economy (discrete chains of Markov with the income)

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Antarctic ice-sheet loss driven by basal melting of ice shelves.

            Accurate prediction of global sea-level rise requires that we understand the cause of recent, widespread and intensifying glacier acceleration along Antarctic ice-sheet coastal margins. Atmospheric and oceanic forcing have the potential to reduce the thickness and extent of floating ice shelves, potentially limiting their ability to buttress the flow of grounded tributary glaciers. Indeed, recent ice-shelf collapse led to retreat and acceleration of several glaciers on the Antarctic Peninsula. But the extent and magnitude of ice-shelf thickness change, the underlying causes of such change, and its link to glacier flow rate are so poorly understood that its future impact on the ice sheets cannot yet be predicted. Here we use satellite laser altimetry and modelling of the surface firn layer to reveal the circum-Antarctic pattern of ice-shelf thinning through increased basal melt. We deduce that this increased melt is the primary control of Antarctic ice-sheet loss, through a reduction in buttressing of the adjacent ice sheet leading to accelerated glacier flow. The highest thinning rates occur where warm water at depth can access thick ice shelves via submarine troughs crossing the continental shelf. Wind forcing could explain the dominant patterns of both basal melting and the surface melting and collapse of Antarctic ice shelves, through ocean upwelling in the Amundsen and Bellingshausen seas, and atmospheric warming on the Antarctic Peninsula. This implies that climate forcing through changing winds influences Antarctic ice-sheet mass balance, and hence global sea level, on annual to decadal timescales.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Ice flow of the Antarctic ice sheet.

              We present a reference, comprehensive, high-resolution, digital mosaic of ice motion in Antarctica assembled from multiple satellite interferometric synthetic-aperture radar data acquired during the International Polar Year 2007 to 2009. The data reveal widespread, patterned, enhanced flow with tributary glaciers reaching hundreds to thousands of kilometers inland over the entire continent. This view of ice sheet motion emphasizes the importance of basal-slip-dominated tributary flow over deformation-dominated ice sheet flow, redefines our understanding of ice sheet dynamics, and has far-reaching implications for the reconstruction and prediction of ice sheet evolution.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Geophysical Research Letters
                Geophys. Res. Lett.
                Wiley
                00948276
                October 28 2016
                October 28 2016
                October 30 2016
                : 43
                : 20
                : 10,817-10,825
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Earth and Space Sciences; University of Washington; Seattle Washington USA
                [2 ]Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences; New York University; New York New York USA
                [3 ]Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory; Princeton University; Princeton New Jersey USA
                [4 ]Polar Science Center, Applied Physics Laboratory; University of Washington; Seattle Washington USA
                [5 ]Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory; Columbia University; Palisades New York USA
                [6 ]Mathematics and Geoscience; Pennsylvania State University; DuBois Pennsylvania USA
                [7 ]Department of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute; Pennsylvania State University; University Park Pennsylvania USA
                [8 ]British Antarctic Survey; Natural Environment Research Council; Cambridge UK
                [9 ]Centre for Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, School of Environmental Sciences; University of East Anglia; Norwich UK
                [10 ]Korea Polar Research Institute; Incheon South Korea
                [11 ]Department of Oceanography; U.S. Naval Postgraduate School; Monterey California USA
                [12 ]Geophysical Institute; University of Alaska Fairbanks; Fairbanks Alaska USA
                [13 ]NASA Goddard Space Flight Center; Greenbelt Maryland USA
                Article
                10.1002/2016GL070500
                cf0c703c-2b77-4928-b453-a97174386323
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article