0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      EUS-guided placement of coils and glue for the management of large bleeding fundic varices

      brief-report
      , MD, , MD, , MD
      VideoGIE
      Elsevier

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We present the case of a 58-year-old woman in whom challenging gastric fundic varices were managed successfully with endoscopic variceal obturation by the use of EUS-guided coil placement with subsequent glue injection (Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org). The patient was transferred to our tertiary referral center because of suspected gastric variceal bleeding. Upon transfer, the patient was in stable condition without active bleeding. She had a new diagnosis of cirrhosis and active hepatitis C infection. CT of the abdomen and pelvis with IV contrast material demonstrated cirrhosis of the liver with diffuse areas that were concerning for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, there was bland and tumor thrombus within the portal vein (Fig. 1) along with a prominent, large splenorenal shunt (Fig. 2) with connection to the left renal vein. A diagnostic EGD demonstrated a cluster of isolated large gastric fundic varices with a platelet plug, indicative of stigmata of recent hemorrhage (Fig. 3). No esophageal varices were seen. Figure 1 CT view of abdomen and pelvis with intravenous contrast material performed on admission, showing cirrhosis of the liver with diffuse multifocal areas concerning for multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma, and evidence of bland and tumor thrombi within the portal vein. Figure 2 CT view showing a prominent, large splenorenal shunt with connection to the left renal vein. Figure 3 Diagnostic EGD view demonstrating a large cluster of isolated gastric fundic varices with stigmata of recent hemorrhage. Management options were discussed extensively in a multidisciplinary fashion. Given the radiographic findings suggestive of multifocal hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation was not an option. Banding of gastric varices was not an option because that procedure is seldom successful and can increase the risk of significant bleeding and mortality. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt was not recommended, given the extensive portal vein thrombus burden. Balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration with variceal embolization would have quickly exacerbated hepatic decompensation. In the setting of a large splenorenal shunt, EUS-guided placement of coils and glue could increase the risk of embolic events. The patient desired a treatment option before going home, albeit a temporary benefit. Extensive discussions with all multidisciplinary team members were carried out to review the various treatment options, their risks, and their benefits. It was decided to proceed with EUS-guided placement of coils, first into the gastric varices, followed by injection of glue. In this way, the coils would serve as a scaffold to which the glue could anchor, to reduce the risk of glue embolization. Intravenous antibiotics were continued, and with the patient under endotracheal intubation, EUS was performed. The large cluster of fundic gastric varices was identified (Fig. 4). Coiling was first carried out. A 19-gauge fine aspiration needle was inserted into a therapeutic linear echoendoscope. The deeper gastric varices were first targeted by puncturing the needle deep into the variceal cluster, followed by deployment of a coil that had a tapering diameter of 10 mm to 4 mm. Coils were repeatedly placed into the varices, working into the more superficial vessels. Once coiling was complete, cyanoacrylate injection was performed, also starting with the deeper clusters of gastric varices. In total, 11 coils were placed, followed by 12 mL cyanoacrylate glue (Fig. 5). After deployment of coils and injection of glue, EUS demonstrated significantly diminished lack of flow within the variceal cluster. Figure 4 EUS view showing a large cluster of fundic gastric varices. Figure 5 Placement of a total of 11 coils under EUS and fluoroscopic guidance, followed by injection of 12 mL cyanoacrylate glue. Endoscopic views after intervention demonstrated no active bleeding and a few coils that had partially migrated into the gastric lumen (Fig. 6). The patient’s postprocedure hospital course was uneventful, with no clinical evidence of recurrent bleeding. Four days later, repeated EGD and EUS were performed to evaluate the response to therapy and demonstrated stable findings of recent coiling and glue injection. On EUS, postacoustic shadowing from the coils and glue injection were visible, and little to no flow was identified within the treated gastric varices, indicating adequate treatment (Fig. 7). The patient remained in stable condition for the remainder of the hospital course. She was deemed to be in medically stable condition and was transferred back to the local hospital the following day for ongoing care, with the ultimate plan that she would then go home for hospice care. Figure 6 Endoscopic view after intervention, demonstrating no active bleeding and a few coils that had partially migrated out into the gastric lumen. Figure 7 EUS view showing postacoustic shadowing from coils and glue injection; little to no flow identified within the treated gastric varices, indicating adequate treatment, with the caveat that coil and glue artifact could potentially obscure some areas of vascular flow. In summary, endoscopic variceal obturation appears to be highly promising in achieving hemostasis in active bleeding and prophylaxis of primary and secondary bleeding.1, 2, 3, 4 Nonetheless, gastric fundic varices are challenging to manage, and a multidisciplinary approach with careful, extensive discussion must be taken in determining the best treatment option. Disclosure Dr Wallace is the recipient of research funds from Olympus. Dr Gómez is a consultant for Olympus. The other author disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Successful obliteration of bleeding duodenal varices by EUS-guided injection of N -butyl-2-cyanoacrylate

          Duodenal varix rupture is a life-threating condition that calls for immediate hemostasis. EUS-guided glue injection and coil deployment have been reported as effective means for obliterating gastric varices, but the therapy has been limited to a few case reports of duodenal varices. A 76-year-old woman with unresectable pancreatic head cancer was admitted to our hospital with melena and faintness of sudden onset. At admission, the patient had severe anemia and elevation of the blood urea nitrogen level (blood test results: hemoglobin, 4.3 mg/dL; blood urea nitrogen level, 28.0 mg/dL). CT revealed occlusion of the superior mesenteric vein and portal vein by invasive tumor, and posterior lower pancreatic duodenal varices (Figs. 1A and B). Endoscopy revealed multinodular varices from the second portion to the third of the duodenum and a white plug on 1 of the varices (Fig. 2). Banding was initially performed by an earlier endoscopist (Fig. 3). Because multinodular duodenal varices had been inadequately treated with banding, EUS (GF TYPE UCT-260, Olympus Medical System, Tokyo, Japan) was performed and showed duodenal varices with rich blood flow (Fig. 4). Subsequently, to achieve complete obliteration, EUS-guided injection of cyanoacrylate (CA) was performed. We prepared one 2-mL syringe filled with 0.5 mL of undiluted CA (N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate, Histoacryl; B. Braun, Barcelona, Spain) and two 5-mL syringes with saline solution for flushing. A disposable 22-gauge FNA needle (Boston Scientific, Natick, Mass) was advanced through the working channel of the endoscope. Under EUS guidance, the target varix was punctured with the needle (Fig. 5). After backflow of blood into the needle was confirmed, saline solution was injected into the varix. Immediately thereafter, 0.5 mL of undiluted CA was injected, followed by saline solution (Video 1, available online at www.VideoGIE.org). We repeated the procedure 3 times and exchanged the needles after each injection. Follow-up CT showed extinction of contrast enhancement of the varices (Figs. 6A and B). The patient was discharged 15 days after the procedure. At her 6-month follow-up visit after the procedure, the patient had not experienced any new episodes of bleeding. Endoscopy 2 months later revealed discharge of the injected CA resulting from elimination of the varices (Fig. 7). Figure 1 A, B, CT scans showing contrast enhancement in the varices. Figure 2 Endoscopic view showing a white plug on 1 of the varices. Figure 3 Banding was performed on the varix. Figure 4 EUS view showing duodenal varices around the self-expanding metal stent. Figure 5 22G EUS-FNA needle punctured into the varices. Figure 6 A, B, CT scans showing loss of contrast enhancement of the varices. Figure 7 Endoscopic view showing discharge of injected cyanoacrylate resulting from complete obliteration of the varices. Duodenal varices are rare and are caused by portal hypertension. 1 A few reports have described successful EUS-guided CA injection.2, 3 A higher success rate of hemostasis and a lower rate of rebleeding associated with CA injection have been reported in comparison with banding in cases of gastric varices. 4 One trial comparing CA injection with sclerotherapy showed that CA injection was associated with a higher obliteration rate of gastric varices. 5 Case reports have suggested the safety and efficacy of endoscopic CA injection for duodenal varices. However, endoscopic CA injection is not easy to perform because of the difficulty of maneuvering the endoscope inside the duodenum and of visualizing the varices during the bleeding. From these standpoints, EUS-guided intervention has the advantages of allowing the varices to be clearly visualized and of allowing evaluation after the therapy. Cyanoacrylate is a class of synthetic glue. It solidifies instantly after having contact with blood; as a result, the blood flow decreases and immediate hemostasis occurs in cases of acute bleeding. 6 Subsequently, owing to the decrease of blood flow, thrombosis occurs, obliterating the varix. A major adverse event of CA injection is organ embolism.7, 8 Reports have suggested an association between the risk of embolism and the amount of CA injected. 9 EUS enables confirmation of the injection needle entry into the varix and precise CA delivery into the varix in real time. 4 As a result, the amount of CA injected can be decreased. Most authors who report injecting CA under endoscopic guidance say that they mix CA with lipiodol to improve the visibility of CA under fluoroscopy. 6 However, mixing CA with lipiodol delays the solidification time and increases the possibility of embolization. 10 In our case, we injected undiluted CA to obtain instant solidification. Thus, EUS-guided CA injection was safe and effective for the control of bleeding duodenal varices. The use of this technique facilitates endoscopic management of duodenal varices. Disclosure All authors disclosed no financial relationships relevant to this publication.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Online video Author interview series EUS-guided treatment of gastric fundal varices with combined injection of coils and cyanoacrylate glue: a large U.S. experience over 6 years (with video)

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found
              Is Open Access

              Endoscopic Injection of a Ruptured Duodenal Varix with N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                VideoGIE
                VideoGIE
                VideoGIE
                Elsevier
                2468-4481
                31 October 2018
                January 2019
                31 October 2018
                : 4
                : 1
                : 17-19
                Affiliations
                [1]Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
                Article
                S2468-4481(18)30189-9
                10.1016/j.vgie.2018.09.005
                6317450
                cf2cd63a-9d35-4d4b-9996-12052dcb3e55
                © 2018 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                Categories
                Video Case Report

                Comments

                Comment on this article