11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Multislice computed tomography in infective endocarditis: comparison with transesophageal echocardiography and intraoperative findings.

      Journal of the American College of Cardiology
      Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Echocardiography, Transesophageal, Endocarditis, diagnosis, epidemiology, surgery, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Observer Variation, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, methods

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of this study was to assess the value of multislice computed tomography (CT) for the assessment of valvular abnormalities in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) in comparison with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) and intraoperative findings. Multislice CT has recently shown promising data regarding valvular imaging in a 4-dimensional fashion. Thirty-seven consecutive patients with clinically suspected IE were examined with TEE and 64-slice CT or dual-source CT. Twenty-nine patients had definite IE and underwent surgery. The diagnostic performance of CT for the detection of evident valvular abnormalities for IE compared with TEE was: sensitivity 97%, specificity 88%, positive predictive value (PPV) 97%, and negative predictive value (NPV) 88% on a per-patient basis (n = 37; excellent intermodality agreement kappa = 0.84). CT correctly identified 26 of 27 (96%) patients with valvular vegetations and 9 of 9 (100%) patients with abscesses/pseudoaneurysms compared with the intraoperative specimen. On a per-valve-based analysis, diagnostic accuracy for the detection of vegetations and abscesses/pseudoaneurysms compared with surgery was: sensitivity 96%, specificity 97%, PPV 96%, NPV 97%, and sensitivity 100%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 100%, respectively, without significant differences as compared with TEE. Vegetation size measurements by CT correlated (r = 0.95; p <0.001) with TEE (mean 7.6 +/- 5.6 mm). The mobility of vegetations was accurately diagnosed in 21 of 22 (96%) patients with CT, but all of 4 leaflet perforations (

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article