507
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Flowcharts for the diagnosis and treatment of acute cholangitis and cholecystitis: Tokyo Guidelines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for acute biliary inflammation/infection (acute cholangitis and acute cholecystitis), according to severity grade, have not yet been established in the world. Therefore we formulated flowcharts for the management of acute biliary inflammation/infection in accordance with severity grade. For mild (grade I) acute cholangitis, medical treatment may be sufficient/appropriate. For moderate (grade II) acute cholangitis, early biliary drainage should be performed. For severe (grade III) acute cholangitis, appropriate organ support such as ventilatory/circulatory management is required. After hemodynamic stabilization is achieved, urgent endoscopic or percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage should be performed. For patients with acute cholangitis of any grade of severity, treatment for the underlying etiology, including endoscopic, percutaneous, or surgical treatment should be performed after the patient’s general condition has improved. For patients with mild (grade I) cholecystitis, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment. For patients with moderate (grade II) acute cholecystitis, early laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy is preferred. In patients with extensive local inflammation, elective cholecystectomy is recommended after initial management with percutaneous gallbladder drainage and/or cholecystostomy. For the patient with severe (grade III) acute cholecystitis, multiorgan support is a critical part of management. Biliary peritonitis due to perforation of the gallbladder is an indication for urgent cholecystectomy and/or drainage. Delayed elective cholecystectomy may be performed after initial treatment with gallbladder drainage and improvement of the patient’s general medical condition.

          Related collections

          Most cited references25

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prospective randomized study of early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

          A prospective randomized study was undertaken to compare early with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis is associated with high complication and conversion rates. It is not known whether there is a role for initial conservative treatment followed by interval elective operation. During a 26-month period, 99 patients with a clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis were randomly assigned to early laparoscopic cholecystectomy within 72 hours of admission (early group, n = 49) or delayed interval surgery after initial medical treatment (delayed group, n = 50). Thirteen patients (four in the early group and nine in the delayed group) were excluded because of refusal of operation (n = 6), misdiagnosis (n = 5), contraindication for surgery (n = 1), or loss to follow-up (n = 1). Eight of 41 patients in the delayed group underwent urgent operation at a median of 63 hours (range, 32 to 140 hours) after admission because of spreading peritonitis (n = 3) and persistent fever (n = 5). Although the delayed group required less frequent modifications in operative technique and a shorter operative time, there was a tendency toward a higher conversion rate (23% vs. 11%; p = 0.174) and complication rate (29% vs. 13%; p = 0.07). For 38 patients with symptoms exceeding 72 hours before admission, the conversion rate remained high after delayed surgery (30% vs. 17%; p = 0.454). In addition, delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy prolonged the total hospital stay (11 days vs. 6 days; p < 0.001) and recuperation period (19 days vs. 12 days; p < 0.001). Initial conservative treatment followed by delayed interval surgery cannot reduce the morbidity and conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. Early operation within 72 hours of admission has both medical and socioeconomic benefits and is the preferred approach for patients managed by surgeons with adequate experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Endoscopic biliary drainage for severe acute cholangitis.

            Emergency surgery for patients with severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Because recent results suggested that emergency endoscopic drainage could improve the outcome of such patients, we undertook a prospective study to determine the role of this procedure as initial treatment. During a 43-month period, 82 patients with severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis were randomly assigned to undergo surgical decompression of the biliary tract (41 patients) or endoscopic biliary drainage (41 patients), followed by definitive treatment. Hospital mortality was analyzed with respect to the use of endoscopic biliary drainage and other clinical and laboratory findings. Prognostic determinants were studied by linear discriminant analysis. Complications related to biliary tract decompression and subsequent definitive treatment developed in 14 patients treated with endoscopic biliary drainage and 27 treated with surgery (34 vs. 66 percent, P greater than 0.05). The time required for normalization of temperature and stabilization of blood pressure was similar in the two groups, but more patients in the surgery group required ventilatory support. The hospital mortality rate was significantly lower for the patients who underwent endoscopy (4 deaths) than for those treated surgically (13 deaths) (10 vs. 32 percent, P less than 0.03). The presence of concomitant medical problems, a low platelet count, a high serum urea nitrogen concentration, and a low serum albumin concentration before biliary decompression were the other independent determinants of mortality in both groups. Endoscopic biliary drainage is a safe and effective measure for the initial control of severe acute cholangitis due to choledocholithiasis and to reduce the mortality associated with the condition.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Does this patient have acute cholecystitis?

              Although few patients with acute abdominal pain will prove to have cholecystitis, ruling in or ruling out acute cholecystitis consumes substantial diagnostic resources. To determine if aspects of the history and physical examination or basic laboratory testing clearly identify patients who require diagnostic imaging tests to rule in or rule out the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Electronic search of the Science Citation Index, Cochrane Library, and English-language articles from January 1966 through November 2000 indexed in MEDLINE. We also hand-searched Index Medicus for 1950-1965, and scanned references in identified articles and bibliographies of prominent textbooks of physical examination, surgery, and gastroenterology. To identify relevant articles appearing since the comprehensive search, we repeated the MEDLINE search in July 2002. Included studies evaluated the role of the history, physical examination, and/or laboratory tests in adults with abdominal pain or suspected acute cholecystitis. Studies had to report data from a control group found not to have acute cholecystitis. Acceptable definitions of cholecystitis included surgery, pathologic examination, hepatic iminodiacetic acid scan or right upper quadrant ultrasound, or clinical course consistent with acute cholecystitis and no evidence for an alternate diagnosis. Studies of acalculous cholecystitis were included. Seventeen of 195 identified studies met the inclusion criteria. Two authors independently abstracted data from the 17 included studies. Disagreements were resolved by discussion and consensus with a third author. No clinical or laboratory finding had a sufficiently high positive likelihood ratio (LR) or low negative LR to rule in or rule out the diagnosis of acute cholecystitis. Possible exceptions were the Murphy sign (positive LR, 2.8; 95% CI, 0.8-8.6) and right upper quadrant tenderness (negative LR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-1.1), though the 95% CIs for both included 1.0. Available data on diagnostic confirmation rates at laparotomy and test characteristics of relevant radiological investigations suggest that the diagnostic impression of acute cholecystitis has a positive LR of 25 to 30. Unfortunately, the available literature does not identify the specific combinations of clinical and laboratory findings that presumably account for this diagnostic success. No single clinical finding or laboratory test carries sufficient weight to establish or exclude cholecystitis without further testing (eg, right upper quadrant ultrasound). Combinations of certain symptoms, signs, and laboratory results likely have more useful LRs, and presumably inform the diagnostic impressions of experienced clinicians. Pending further research characterizing the pretest probabilities associated with different clinical presentations, the evaluation of patients with abdominal pain suggestive of cholecystitis will continue to rely heavily on the clinical gestalt and diagnostic imaging.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg
                Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
                Springer-Verlag (Tokyo )
                0944-1166
                1436-0691
                30 January 2007
                January 2007
                : 14
                : 1
                : 27-34
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Teikyo University School of Medicine, 2-11-1 Kaga, Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, 173-8605 Japan
                [ ]Mie University School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
                [ ]Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
                [ ]Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto, Japan
                [ ]Department of Medicine and Clinical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
                [ ]Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Washington University in St Louis and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St Louis, USA
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA
                [ ]Department of Digestive Surgery and Transplantation, Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
                [ ]Department of Surgery, University of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
                [ ]Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Medical College of Georgia, Georgia, USA
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
                [ ]Department of Surgery, The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Hong Kong, China
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
                [ ]Division of Surgical and Specialty Services, Flinders Medical Centre, Adelaide, Australia
                [ ]Division of General Surgery, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
                [ ]Department of Surgery, Tan Tock Seng Hospital / Hepatobiliary Surgery, Medical Centre, Singapore, Singapore
                [ ]Department of General and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, S.M. Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Naples, Italy
                [ ]First Department of Surgery, Agia Olga Hospital, Athens, Greece
                Article
                1153
                10.1007/s00534-006-1153-x
                2784508
                17252294
                cf55f2ae-8c16-47d3-a216-e8566ec3fad5
                © Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2007
                History
                : 31 May 2006
                : 06 August 2006
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Springer-Verlag Tokyo 2007

                Surgery
                drainage,guidelines,cholecystec-tomy,acute cholecystitis,laparoscopic cholecystectomy,cholangitis,biliary

                Comments

                Comment on this article