14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A modular protein subunit vaccine candidate produced in yeast confers protection against SARS-CoV-2 in non-human primates

      Preprint
      research-article
      1 , 2 , 3 , 2 , 4 , 5 , 5 , 5 , 3 , 6 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 7 , 3 , 3 , 3 , 8 , 2 , 2 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 2 , 10 , 11 , 5 , 5 , 11 , 1 , 2 , 12 , 3 , 7 , 12 , 13
      bioRxiv
      Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 have been distributed at massive scale in developed countries, and have been effective at preventing COVID-19. Access to vaccines is limited, however, in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to insufficient supply, high costs, and cold storage requirements. New vaccines that can be produced in existing manufacturing facilities in LMICs, can be manufactured at low cost, and use widely available, proven, safe adjuvants like alum, would improve global immunity against SARS-CoV-2. One such protein subunit vaccine is produced by the Serum Institute of India Pvt. Ltd. and is currently in clinical testing. Two protein components, the SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain (RBD) and hepatitis B surface antigen virus-like particles (VLPs), are each produced in yeast, which would enable a low-cost, high-volume manufacturing process. Here, we describe the design and preclinical testing of the RBD-VLP vaccine in cynomolgus macaques. We observed titers of neutralizing antibodies (>10 4) above the range of protection for other licensed vaccines in non-human primates. Interestingly, addition of a second adjuvant (CpG1018) appeared to improve the cellular response while reducing the humoral response. We challenged animals with SARS-CoV-2, and observed a ~3.4 and ~2.9 log 10 reduction in median viral loads in bronchoalveolar lavage and nasal mucosa, respectively, compared to sham controls. These results inform the design and formulation of current clinical COVID-19 vaccine candidates like the one described here, and future designs of RBD-based vaccines against variants of SARS-CoV-2 or other betacoronaviruses.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting

          Abstract Background As mass vaccination campaigns against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) commence worldwide, vaccine effectiveness needs to be assessed for a range of outcomes across diverse populations in a noncontrolled setting. In this study, data from Israel’s largest health care organization were used to evaluate the effectiveness of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Methods All persons who were newly vaccinated during the period from December 20, 2020, to February 1, 2021, were matched to unvaccinated controls in a 1:1 ratio according to demographic and clinical characteristics. Study outcomes included documented infection with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), symptomatic Covid-19, Covid-19–related hospitalization, severe illness, and death. We estimated vaccine effectiveness for each outcome as one minus the risk ratio, using the Kaplan–Meier estimator. Results Each study group included 596,618 persons. Estimated vaccine effectiveness for the study outcomes at days 14 through 20 after the first dose and at 7 or more days after the second dose was as follows: for documented infection, 46% (95% confidence interval [CI], 40 to 51) and 92% (95% CI, 88 to 95); for symptomatic Covid-19, 57% (95% CI, 50 to 63) and 94% (95% CI, 87 to 98); for hospitalization, 74% (95% CI, 56 to 86) and 87% (95% CI, 55 to 100); and for severe disease, 62% (95% CI, 39 to 80) and 92% (95% CI, 75 to 100), respectively. Estimated effectiveness in preventing death from Covid-19 was 72% (95% CI, 19 to 100) for days 14 through 20 after the first dose. Estimated effectiveness in specific subpopulations assessed for documented infection and symptomatic Covid-19 was consistent across age groups, with potentially slightly lower effectiveness in persons with multiple coexisting conditions. Conclusions This study in a nationwide mass vaccination setting suggests that the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine is effective for a wide range of Covid-19–related outcomes, a finding consistent with that of the randomized trial.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Correlates of Protection Against SARS-CoV-2 in Rhesus Macaques

            Recent studies have reported protective efficacy of both natural immunity 1 and vaccine-induced immunity 2 – 7 against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) challenge in rhesus macaques. However, the importance of humoral and cellular immunity for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection remains to be determined. Here we show that adoptive transfer of purified IgG from convalescent macaques protects naïve recipient rhesus macaques against SARS-CoV-2 challenge in a dose dependent fashion. Depletion of CD8+ T cells in convalescent animals partially abrogated the protective efficacy of natural immunity against SARS-CoV-2 re-challenge, suggesting the importance of cellular immunity in the context of waning or subprotective antibody titers. These data demonstrate that relatively low antibody titers are sufficient for protection against SARS-CoV-2 in rhesus macaques, and that cellular immune responses may also contribute to protection if antibody responses are suboptimal. We also show that higher antibody titers are required for therapy of SARS-CoV-2 infection in macaques. These findings have important implications for the development of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and immune-based therapeutics.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                bioRxiv
                BIORXIV
                bioRxiv
                Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
                14 July 2021
                : 2021.07.13.452251
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
                [2 ]The Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
                [3 ]Center for Virology and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
                [4 ]Department of Biological Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
                [5 ]Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Vaccine Analytics and Formulation Center, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, 66047, USA
                [6 ]Departments of Infectious Diseases and Global Health and Comparative Pathobiology, Cummings School of Veterinary Medicine, Tufts University, North Grafton, MA 01536, USA
                [7 ]Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                [8 ]SpyBiotech Limited, Oxford Business Park North, Oxford, OX4 2JZ, United Kingdom
                [9 ]Bioqual, Rockville, MD 20852, USA
                [10 ]Bill & Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
                [11 ]Bill&Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, WA 98109, USA
                [12 ]Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
                [13 ]Massachusetts Consortium on Pathogen Readiness, Boston, MA 02115, USA
                Author notes

                Author contributions

                N.C.D., L.H.T., S.R.A., J.C.L., and D.H.B. conceived and planned experiments. K.K., S.B., and O.S.K. analyzed vaccine samples. N.C.D., S.R.A., C.A.N., and L.B. analyzed unformulated drug substance. D.Y. performed electron microscopy. L.H.T. coordinated and analyzed animal experiments. A.C., K.M., N.B.M., J.Y., A.C., V.M.G., F.N., and S.P. performed immunologic and virologic assays. A.J.M. performed the histopathology. Z.F., L.P., R.B., J.V., E.T., A.C., H.A., and M.G.L. led clinical care of non-human primates. D.C. and J.M.S. coordinated and managed resource allocations and planning for experimental studies. N.C.D., L.H.T., S.R.A., J.C.L., and D.H.B. wrote the manuscript. D.H.B., J.C.L., S.B., D.B.V., S.B.J., and H.K. designed the experimental strategy and reviewed analyses of data. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

                Article
                10.1101/2021.07.13.452251
                8288147
                34282417
                cfa7c9c1-483f-4adf-bdc1-8cffb8f98222

                This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article