In response to stalling progress in NCD related premature mortality, the Portuguese
government declared the ‘Promotion of Healthy Eating’ a national priority and convened
a multisectoral task force with representatives from several ministries in order to
tackle unhealthy diets [1]. With the inputs from civil society, non-governmental organisations
and health authorities, this task force developed the Integrated Strategy for the
Promotion of Healthy Eating (Estratégia Integrada para a Promoção da Alimentação Saudável
– “EIPAS”). The strategy – endorsed by the Portuguese Ministers Council in December
2017 – included fiscal measures, co-regulation agreements with the food industry,
enhanced cooperation with municipalities, and measures to change the food environments
in public settings among many other initiatives [1].
In December 2016, the Portuguese Parliament approved a special consumption tax on
sweetened beverages which has been associated with product reformulation and a fall
in sales [2]. Inspired by the success of the tax on sweetened beverages, in December
2018, the government proposed a tax on salty processed foods; as salt is the leading
dietary risk factor for NCDs in Portugal [3]. Even though the average consumption
is 10.7g/d [3] far above of the WHO recommended threshold of <5g/d, the majority of
the Portuguese Parliament Members voted against this proposal, recommending instead
a co-regulation agreement with the food industry to achieve similar changes in consumption
of salt [4]. After one year of negotiations, the Portuguese Ministry of Health (MoH)
and the food industry representatives signed a broad ‘Food Industry Co-regulation
Agreement’ on the 2nd of May 2019.
The agreement covers the main food products high in salt, sugar, and trans fatty acids
as well as the main dietary sources of these nutrients for the Portuguese population.
An analysis of population consumption patterns [5,6], conducted by the Institute of
Public Health at the University of Porto, led to a consensus among the different agreement
stakeholders that 11 food categories should be subject to reformulation (
Table 1
). All stakeholders agreed that the consumption targets to be achieved should be based
on a baseline assessment of sales figures for food products representing at least
80% of the market share for each category.
Table 1
Sugar, salt and trans fatty acids reduction targets before and after negotiations
Food category
Targets for macronutrient reformulation
Targets suggested by the MoH (before negotiations)
Targets agreed between the MoH and the food sector (after negotiations)
Sugar:
Breakfast cereals
20%
10%
Cookies and biscuits
20%
No agreement reached
Chocolate milk
20%
10%
Yogurts
20%
10%
Soft drinks
20%
10%
Fruit juices
20%
7%
Salt:
Crisps and other snacks
16%
12%
Cookies and biscuits
16%
No agreement reached
Breakfast cereals
16%
10%
Processed meats (ham)
16%
No agreement reached
Cheese
16%
No agreement reached
Ready-to-eat soups
16%
10%
Bread Toast
16%
No agreement reached
Bread
30%
30%
Trans fatty acids:
Fat spreads
<2g of fat
<2g of fat
Cookies and biscuits
<2g of fat
<2g of fat
Pastries
<1g of fat
<1g of fat
*All reductions percentages are based on baseline levels from March 2018.
The initial reformulation targets proposed by the MoH (before negotiations with the
food industry) were based on the WHO salt reduction targets [7] as well as on other
countries’ preliminary food reformulation experiences [8,9]. The final co-regulation
agreement framework utilised the Nielsen Consumer Panels information namely monthly
sales for every food product, brand and category as well as their respective nutritional
information validated by the Health authorities. These sources were chosen in order
to optimise compliance, transparency and accountability.
A joint Ministry of Health-WHO modelling exercise [10] suggests that fully meeting
the targets initially suggested by the MoH (before negotiations with the food industry)
would prevent 798 premature deaths from non-communicable diseases per year [11]. It
concludes, however, that even by adopting such ambitious reformulation targets, Portugal
is unlikely to achieve the WHO target of reducing premature deaths attributable to
noncommunicable diseases by one third by 2030. Despite such evidence, after one year
of negotiations, the Food Industry representatives have been able to persuade the
MoH not only to delay the agreement targets deadline from 2021 to 2022, but also to
lower the initial reformulation targets (
Table 1
). Since the final agreement targets are actually much less ambitious than the preliminary
ones, the health impact of the agreement will be considerably smaller.
The projection that voluntary industry agreement will prevent a relatively small number
of deaths is supported by previous evidence suggesting that voluntary industry action
can achieve health gains. Nevertheless, voluntary action will be insufficient on its
own and must be complemented with other public health interventions in order to substantively
improve population health outcomes [12]. In fact, the literature strongly suggests
that mandatory approaches generate larger health gains than voluntary agreements [12,13].
Cobiac and colleagues [10] estimate that health gains from mandatory measures could
be 20 times higher than voluntary interventions [11].
Photo: Wolfmann, CC BY-SA 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0)
We are concerned that the consensus reformulation agreement targets achieved after
negotiations with the food industry may not be ambitious and timely enough, neither
to have an effective impact on the NCD epidemic, nor to allow Portugal to achieve
the WHO food reformulation targets by 2030. Further research analysing the impact
of the Portuguese Government’s flexibility during the negotiations with the processed
food industry representatives would be important in order to promote accountability,
to inform other policy makers facing similar negotiations and to conclude if such
a limited agreement was a worth-while enterprise.
We have to acknowledge that engaging with the MoH and committing to voluntarily targets
carries financial implications for industry in terms of reformulation costs, costs
of engagement, and the risk of sales reductions as a result of any product changes.
These factors should not obscure the fact that poor diet is a leading cause of death
and disability, nor should weak voluntary efforts be allowed to trump effective legislative
measures (including regulation and fiscal instruments) that are much more likely to
improve diets and save lives. Given that the evidence suggests that even the stronger
originally proposed voluntary targets would only prevent a small minority of diet-related
deaths, we feel that the Government should immediately consider complimentary mandatory
policies, including those that cover food served in cafeterias, canteens, restaurants
and hotels as one of the leading sources of sugar, salt and trans fats in Portugal.