For Publishers
DiscoveryMetadataPeer reviewHostingPublishing
For Researchers
JoinPublishReviewCollect
Register
Blog
About
Search
Advanced search
My ScienceOpen
Search
For Publishers
For Researchers
Blog
About
83
views
24
references
 Top references
cited by
218
    
0 reviews
 Review
0
comments
 Comment
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      524
      similar
       All similar
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Framing Public Opinion in Competitive Democracies

      Author(s): ,
      Publication date (Print):
      Journal: American Political Science Review
      Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Framing Theory

          Dennis Chong, James N. Druckman (2007)
          We review the meaning of the concept of framing, approaches to studying framing, and the effects of framing on public opinion. After defining framing and framing effects, we articulate a method for identifying frames in communication and a psychological model for understanding how such frames affect public opinion. We also discuss the relationship between framing and priming, outline future research directions, and describe the normative implications of framing.
          Article 0 comments Cited 647 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Implicit measures in social cognition. research: their meaning and use.

            Russell Fazio, Michael A Olson (2003)
            Behavioral scientists have long sought measures of important psychological constructs that avoid response biases and other problems associated with direct reports. Recently, a large number of such indirect, or "implicit," measures have emerged. We review research that has utilized these measures across several domains, including attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes, and discuss their predictive validity, their interrelations, and the mechanisms presumably underlying their operation. Special attention is devoted to various priming measures and the Implicit Association Test, largely due to their prevalence in the literature. We also attempt to clarify several unresolved theoretical and empirical issues concerning implicit measures, including the nature of the underlying constructs they purport to measure, the conditions under which they are most likely to relate to explicit measures, the kinds of behavior each measure is likely to predict, their sensitivity to context, and the construct's potential for change.
            Article 0 comments Cited 504 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and Its Effect on Tolerance

              Thomas E. Nelson, Rosalee A. Clawson, Zoe M. Oxley (1997)
              Framing is the process by which a communication source, such as a news organization, defines and constructs a political issue or public controversy. Two experiments examined the effect of news frames on tolerance for the Ku Klux Klan. The first presented research participants with one of two local news stories about a Klan rally that varied by frame: One framed the rally as a free speech issue, and the other framed it as a disruption of public order. Participants who viewed the free speech story expressed more tolerance for the Klan than participants who watched the public order story. Additional data indicate that frames affect tolerance by altering the perceived importance of public order values. The relative accessibility of free speech and public order concepts did not respond to framing. A second experiment used a simulated electronic news service to present different frames and replicated these findings.
              Article 0 comments Cited 283 times – based on 0 reviews     Review now
                Bookmark
                All references

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Journal ID (publisher-id): applab
                Title: American Political Science Review
                Abbreviated Title: APSR
                Publisher: Cambridge University Press (CUP)
                ISSN (Print): 0003-0554
                ISSN (Electronic): 1537-5943
                Publication date Created: November 2007
                Publication date (Print): November 2007
                Volume: 101
                Issue: 04
                Pages: 637-655
                Article
                DOI: 10.1017/S0003055407070554
                SO-VID: d025c64b-0836-4adc-af0a-97a23910bcc5
                Copyright © © 2007
                History

                Data availability:

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content524

                See all similar

                Cited by215

                See all cited by

                Most referenced authors151

                See all reference authors