19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation Translated title: O impacto da oxigenação extracorpórea por membrana no transplante pulmonar

      letter

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          TO THE EDITOR: Lung transplantation is a complex procedure that requires extracorporeal mechanical cardiopulmonary support in many situations. Such support can be provided preoperatively, intraoperatively, or postoperatively, depending on the patient’s severity of illness and clinical status. This occurs in approximately 30-40% of lung transplants. The situations that most commonly require such support in the intraoperative period include pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), right ventricular dysfunction, and intolerance to single-lung ventilation. 1 The optimal strategy remains a matter of debate 2 ; however, the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has been shown to provide numerous benefits over the use of cardiopulmonary bypass. This is because ECMO support resulted in lower rates of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), bleeding, and renal failure requiring dialysis, as well as a lower rate of tracheostomy, less intraoperative blood transfusion, shorter durations of mechanical ventilation, and shorter hospital stays. 3 Between January of 2017 and December of 2018, 24 lung transplants were performed at the Porto Alegre Hospital de Clínicas, located in the city of Porto Alegre, Brazil. The clinical and laboratory data from those transplant recipients were statistically analyzed by using the chi-square and Mann-Whitney U tests and are shown in Table 1. Of the 24 patients included in the analysis, 12 received ECMO for cardiopulmonary support, 11 (92%) of whom underwent bilateral lung transplantation, whereas 12 did not require ECMO, 7 (58%) of whom underwent unilateral lung transplantation. Suppurative lung diseases accounted for 50% of the cases of patients transplanted with ECMO support. In patients who did not require ECMO, a diagnosis of COPD was more prevalent. The first use of ECMO at our center was as a bridge to transplantation. Three of the patients in the ECMO group, given the impossibility of establishing single-lung ventilation, received venovenous (VV) ECMO only for ventilatory support. The remaining patients received venoarterial (VA) ECMO for ventilatory and hemodynamic support. Patients with significant PAH underwent peripheral cannulation under local anesthesia and sedation prior to induction of anesthesia. Patients without PAH or with mildly elevated pulmonary pressure underwent central arterial cannulation of the thoracic aorta and peripheral venous cannulation of the right femoral vein. At the end of the procedure, VA ECMO was continued in patients with PAH or was converted to VV ECMO if the patient was hemodynamically stable and did not have PAH. To that end, a single-lumen catheter previously positioned in the right internal jugular vein allowed placement of a guidewire and local cannulation. Thus, the aortic arterial cannula was disconnected and removed after reconnection with the jugular vein cannula. Decannulation from VV ECMO was performed in the ICU after extubation and confirmation of absence of PGD. There was no difference in hospital or ICU lengths of stay between patients who received ECMO and those who did not, although the former were more severely ill, as demonstrated by the need to use a greater volume of crystalloids, the greater need for transfusion, the longer operative times, and the higher percentage of bilateral transplants. The estimated 36-month survival was 66.7% among patients who received ECMO, compared with 91.7% among those who did not. Although mortality was higher in the ECMO group, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.143). Table 1 Data from patients undergoing pulmonary transplantation between January of 2017 and December of 2018. Porto Alegre Hospital de Clínicas, Porto Alegre, Brazil.a Data Groups p ECMO No ECMO (n = 12) (n = 12) Gender (M/F) 7 (58%)/5 (42%) 6 (50%)/6 (50%) 0.68 Age, years 48 (17-60) 55 (22-65) 0.14 Type of transplant - Unilateral - Bilateral 1 (8%) 11 (92%) 7 (58%) 5 (42%) 0.027 Diagnosis - Pulmonary fibrosis - Cystic fibrosis - COPD/emphysema - Bronchiectasis - PAH - Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency 2 (17%) 3 (25%) 3 (25%) 3 (25%) 1 (8%) 0 (0%) 2 (17%) 0 (0%) 7 (58%) 2 (17%) 0 (0%) 1 (8%) 0.12 PASP ≥ 35 mmHg 7 (58%) 2 (17%) 0.09 MPAP, mmHg 28 (17-79) 22 (13-32) 0.16 FEV1, % predicted 21% (16-70%) 23% (17-42%) 0.63 FVC, % predicted 37% (13-78%) 40% (33-56%) 0.16 Operative time, h 11 (8-17) 6 (3-11) < 0.001 Cold ischemia time of the first graft, min 432 (270-540) 400 (205-558) 0.45 Cold ischemia time of the second graft, min 632 (520-720) 635 (480-705) 0.82 Crystalloid, mL 6,500 (3,000-32,600) 2,800 (1,400-7,000) < 0.001 Need for blood transfusion 9 (75%) 1 (8%) 0.001 ICU length of stay, days 12 (5-103) 7 (2-16) 0.17 Hospital length of stay, days 27 (20-117) 29 (17-76) 0.84 90-day mortality 3 (25%) 1 (8%) 0.27 Mean estimated 36-month survival, months 27 35 0.143* a Values expressed as n, n (%), or median (minimum-maximum). ECMO: extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; M/F: male/female; PAH: pulmonary arterial hypertension; PASP: pulmonary artery systolic pressure; and MPAP: mean pulmonary artery pressure. *Log-rank test comparing the Kaplan-Meier curves of the two groups. The first reports of the use of ECMO date back to the 1970s; however, they were limited to experimental strategies with unfavorable outcomes. 4 The use of ECMO in the pediatric population and in patients with ARDS 5 has resulted in technical progress and increased experience. Although the use of ECMO during lung transplantation was first described in 2001, it has only recently been introduced in Brazil. 6 VV ECMO provides ventilatory support by drawing deoxygenated blood from the venous system in order to oxygenate it and return it to the same system. In contrast, VA ECMO enables cardiopulmonary bypass by returning oxygenated blood to the arterial system. 7 Intraoperative ECMO, in addition to ensuring greater safety during cardiac manipulation, reduces the chance of reperfusion injury by allowing better control of blood flow after the pulmonary artery clamp is released, thereby preventing the first implanted graft from receiving the entire cardiac output during implantation of the second graft. In addition, intraoperative ECMO precludes the need for aggressive ventilation to maintain gas exchange and allows continued support in the postoperative period. 2 In patients with PAH or considerable hemodynamic instability, it is essential to maintain VA support in the postoperative period, since cardiac output has to be reduced to enable remodeling of the right ventricle, which is chronically hypertrophic. 8 In other patients, there is no consensus on the type of or need for postoperative support. As for our team, in cases in which it is possible to discontinue VA support at the end of the surgery, we prefer to avoid decannulation and carry out conversion from VA to VV support, which is continued in the postoperative period. Thus, mechanical ventilation at protective settings is delivered until early extubation is achieved and spontaneous ventilation begins. The use of VV ECMO for the treatment of severe PGD is well established, increasing survival and minimizing the deleterious effects of mechanical ventilation. There is also evidence that the institution of ECMO within 2 hours of the diagnosis of grade 3 PGD results in increased survival, whereas delayed institution of ECMO is associated with very high mortality. 9 Other studies have shown that cases requiring ECMO for the treatment of PGD have a significantly reduced rate of long-term graft survival, as compared with cases not requiring such management. 10 Thus, institution of VA ECMO in the intraoperative period helps hemodynamic stability and provides protection for the graft, whereas continued VV support in the postoperative period reduces the need for mechanical ventilation and provides preemptive treatment of possible reperfusion injury. In our experience, we found that the use of ECMO to provide cardiopulmonary support in patients with suppurative lung disease with or without concomitant PAH resulted in good survival, although these patients were more severely ill than those who did not receive ECMO; however, hospital and ICU lengths of stay were similar in both groups of patients, making this strategy an important part of the therapeutic arsenal in the setting of lung transplantation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references12

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and the possibility of postoperative prolongation improve survival in bilateral lung transplantation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Cannulation Strategies in Adult Veno-arterial and Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Techniques, Limitations, and Special Considerations

            Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) refers to specific mechanical devices used to temporarily support the failing heart and/or lung. Technological advances as well as growing collective knowledge and experience have resulted in increased ECMO use and improved outcomes. Veno-arterial (VA) ECMO is used in selected patients with various etiologies of cardiogenic shock and entails either central or peripheral cannulation. Central cannulation is frequently used in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and is associated with improved venous drainage and reduced concern for upper body hypoxemia as compared to peripheral cannulation. These concerns inherent to peripheral VA ECMO may be addressed through so-called triple cannulation approaches. Veno-venous (VV) ECMO is increasingly employed in selected patients with respiratory failure refractory to more conventional measures. Newer dual lumen VV ECMO cannulas may facilitate extubation and mobilization. In summary, the pathology being addressed impacts the ECMO approach that is deployed, and each ECMO implementation has distinct virtues and drawbacks. Understanding these considerations is crucial to safe and effective ECMO use.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Outcomes of intraoperative venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation versus cardiopulmonary bypass during lung transplantation.

              The intraoperative use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in lung transplantation has been associated with increased rates of pulmonary dysfunction and bleeding complications. More recently, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a valid alternative method of support and has been our preferred method of support since March 2012. We compared early and midterm outcomes of these 2 support methods.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Bras Pneumol
                J Bras Pneumol
                jbpneu
                Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia
                Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia
                1806-3713
                1806-3756
                Jan-Feb 2021
                Jan-Feb 2021
                : 47
                : 1
                : e20200207
                Affiliations
                [1 ]. Serviço de Cirurgia Torácica, Grupo de Transplante Pulmonar do Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre - HCPA - Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil.
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0211-0513
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2756-9040
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0964-3286
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6431-3079
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2228-2956
                Article
                00000
                10.36416/1806-3756/e20200207
                7889321
                33503133
                d046b468-e02c-4ab0-b8d8-fea082bc081f
                © 2021 Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 10
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Comments

                Comment on this article