31
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Cascade use indicators for selected biopolymers: Are we aiming for the right solutions in the design for recycling of bio-based polymers?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          When surveying the trends and criteria for the design for recycling (DfR) of bio-based polymers, priorities appear to lie in energy recovery at the end of the product life of durable products, such as bio-based thermosets. Non-durable products made of thermoplastic polymers exhibit good properties for material recycling. The latter commonly enjoy growing material recycling quotas in countries that enforce a landfill ban. Quantitative and qualitative indicators are needed for characterizing progress in the development towards more recycling friendly bio-based polymers. This would enable the deficits in recycling bio-based plastics to be tracked and improved. The aim of this paper is to analyse the trends in the DfR of bio-based polymers and the constraints posed by the recycling infrastructure on plastic polymers from a systems perspective. This analysis produces recommendations on how life cycle assessment indicators can be introduced into the dialogue between designers and recyclers in order to promote DfR principles to enhance the cascading use of bio-based polymers within the bioeconomy, and to meet circular economy goals.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Compatibilization in bio-based and biodegradable polymer blends

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Sustainability metrics: life cycle assessment and green design in polymers.

            This study evaluates the efficacy of green design principles such as the "12 Principles of Green Chemistry," and the "12 Principles of Green Engineering" with respect to environmental impacts found using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. A case study of 12 polymers is presented, seven derived from petroleum, four derived from biological sources, and one derived from both. The environmental impacts of each polymer's production are assessed using LCA methodology standardized by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Each polymer is also assessed for its adherence to green design principles using metrics generated specifically for this paper. Metrics include atom economy, mass from renewable sources, biodegradability, percent recycled, distance of furthest feedstock, price, life cycle health hazards and life cycle energy use. A decision matrix is used to generate single value metrics for each polymer evaluating either adherence to green design principles or life-cycle environmental impacts. Results from this study show a qualified positive correlation between adherence to green design principles and a reduction of the environmental impacts of production. The qualification results from a disparity between biopolymers and petroleum polymers. While biopolymers rank highly in terms of green design, they exhibit relatively large environmental impacts from production. Biopolymers rank 1, 2, 3, and 4 based on green design metrics; however they rank in the middle of the LCA rankings. Polyolefins rank 1, 2, and 3 in the LCA rankings, whereas complex polymers, such as PET, PVC, and PC place at the bottom of both ranking systems.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of the environmental profile of PLA, PET and PS clamshell containers using LCA methodology

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Waste Manag Res
                Waste Manag Res
                WMR
                spwmr
                Waste Management & Research
                SAGE Publications (Sage UK: London, England )
                0734-242X
                1096-3669
                18 January 2017
                April 2017
                : 35
                : 4
                : 367-378
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Germany
                [2 ]Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (DBFZ), Germany
                Author notes
                [*]Jakob Hildebrandt, Helmholtz-Centre for Environmental Research, Permoserstraße 15 Leipzig, Saxony 04318, Germany. Email: jakob.hildebrandt@ 123456ufz.de
                Article
                10.1177_0734242X16683445
                10.1177/0734242X16683445
                5560479
                28097922
                d0526df4-5e79-4200-9580-6008e0739e51
                © The Author(s) 2017

                This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License ( http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page ( https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100002347;
                Award ID: 031A078A
                Funded by: Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft, FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001656;
                Award ID: Portfolio Topic “Sustainable Bioeconomy”
                Categories
                Original Articles

                design for recyclability,bio-based polymers,system analysis,cascade use

                Comments

                Comment on this article