2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The Swedish National Airway Register (SNAR): development, design and utility to date

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          ABSTRACT

          Background

          The Swedish National Airway Register (SNAR) was initiated in 2013 to ensure and improve the quality of care for patients with asthma and COPD.

          Aim

          To describe the development and design of SNAR, and to study the 2019 data to evaluate its potential utility related to improvement of quality of care.

          Methods

          SNAR includes data from patients with asthma (both children and adults) and COPD from primary, secondary and tertiary care, and also, for COPD inpatient care. Data on diagnostic investigations (e.g. spirometry, blood sample, skin prick test), symptom-scores, comorbidities and prescribed treatments are registered. The registrations are entered manually by healthcare professionals, or directly transferred from electronic medical records to a web-based platform.

          Results

          In 2019, 1000 clinics participated and data were directly transferred by about 88% of them. The register included data on 205,833 patients with asthma and 80,372 with COPD (of these, 5% had both diagnoses). Registrations of new patients and follow-up visits from primary and secondary/tertiary care in 2019 were completed for 75,707 patients with asthma (11,818 children <12 yr, 6545 adolescents 12–17 yr, and 57,344 adults >17 yr) and 38,117 with COPD. Depending on age and disease group, 43–77% had performed spirometry, 36–65% Asthma Control Test, and 60% COPD Assessment Test. The prevalence of current smoking was about 2% in adolescents, 10% in adults with asthma, and 34% in COPD. For these, smoking cessation support was offered to 27%, 38% and 51%, respectively. Overall, limited data were available on investigation of allergy, 6-min walk test, patient education and written treatment plans. Regarding asthma, sex-differences in disease management were evident.

          Conclusion

          SNAR has cumulatively registered data from over 270,000 individuals, and the register is important for patients, caregivers, authorities, politicians and researchers to evaluate the effect of treatment and to ensure high and equal quality of care nationwide.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Standardization of Spirometry 2019 Update. An Official American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society Technical Statement

          Background: Spirometry is the most common pulmonary function test. It is widely used in the assessment of lung function to provide objective information used in the diagnosis of lung diseases and monitoring lung health. In 2005, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society jointly adopted technical standards for conducting spirometry. Improvements in instrumentation and computational capabilities, together with new research studies and enhanced quality assurance approaches, have led to the need to update the 2005 technical standards for spirometry to take full advantage of current technical capabilities. Methods: This spirometry technical standards document was developed by an international joint task force, appointed by the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society, with expertise in conducting and analyzing pulmonary function tests, laboratory quality assurance, and developing international standards. A comprehensive review of published evidence was performed. A patient survey was developed to capture patients’ experiences. Results: Revisions to the 2005 technical standards for spirometry were made, including the addition of factors that were not previously considered. Evidence to support the revisions was cited when applicable. The experience and expertise of task force members were used to develop recommended best practices. Conclusions: Standards and consensus recommendations are presented for manufacturers, clinicians, operators, and researchers with the aims of increasing the accuracy, precision, and quality of spirometric measurements and improving the patient experience. A comprehensive guide to aid in the implementation of these standards was developed as an online supplement.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Development and first validation of the COPD Assessment Test.

            There is need for a validated short, simple instrument to quantify chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) impact in routine practice to aid health status assessment and communication between patient and physician. Current health-related quality of life questionnaires provide valid assessment of COPD, but are complex, which limits routine use. The aim of the present study was to develop a short validated patient-completed questionnaire, the COPD Assessment Test (CAT), assessing the impact of COPD on health status. 21 candidate items identified through qualitative research with COPD patients were used in three prospective international studies (Europe and the USA, n = 1,503). Psychometric and Rasch analyses identified eight items fitting a unidimensional model to form the CAT. Items were tested for differential functioning between countries. Internal consistency was excellent: Cronbach's alpha = 0.88. Test re-test in stable patients (n = 53) was very good (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.8). In the sample from the USA, the correlation with the COPD-specific version of the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire was r = 0.80. The difference between stable (n = 229) and exacerbation patients (n = 67) was five units of the 40-point scale (12%; p<0.0001). The CAT is a short, simple questionnaire for assessing and monitoring COPD. It has good measurement properties, is sensitive to differences in state and should provide a valid, reliable and standardised measure of COPD health status with worldwide relevance.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              An official European Respiratory Society/American Thoracic Society technical standard: field walking tests in chronic respiratory disease.

              Field walking tests are commonly employed to evaluate exercise capacity, assess prognosis and evaluate treatment response in chronic respiratory diseases. In recent years, there has been a wealth of new literature pertinent to the conduct of the 6-min walk test (6MWT), and a growing evidence base describing the incremental and endurance shuttle walk tests (ISWT and ESWT, respectively). The aim of this document is to describe the standard operating procedures for the 6MWT, ISWT and ESWT, which can be consistently employed by clinicians and researchers. The Technical Standard was developed by a multidisciplinary and international group of clinicians and researchers with expertise in the application of field walking tests. The procedures are underpinned by a concurrent systematic review of literature relevant to measurement properties and test conduct in adults with chronic respiratory disease. Current data confirm that the 6MWT, ISWT and ESWT are valid, reliable and responsive to change with some interventions. However, results are sensitive to small changes in methodology. It is important that two tests are conducted for the 6MWT and ISWT. This Technical Standard for field walking tests reflects current evidence regarding procedures that should be used to achieve robust results.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur Clin Respir J
                Eur Clin Respir J
                European Clinical Respiratory Journal
                Taylor & Francis
                2001-8525
                23 October 2020
                2020
                : 7
                : 1
                : 1833412
                Affiliations
                [a ]Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, the OLIN-unit, Umeå University; , Umeå, Sweden
                [b ]Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet; , Stockholm, Sweden
                [c ]COPD Center, Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital; , Gothenburg, Sweden
                [d ]Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Nutrition, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University; , Gothenburg, Sweden
                [e ]Department of Woman and Child Health, Uppsala University; , Uppsala, Sweden
                [f ]Södertälje General Hospital; , Sweden
                [g ]The Swedish Asthma- and Allergy Association; , Stockholm, Sweden
                [h ]The Swedish Asthma- and Allergy Research Foundation; , Stockholm, Sweden
                [i ]The Swedish Heart and Lung Association; , Stockholm, Sweden
                [j ]The Swedish National Airway Register; , Gothenburg, Sweden
                [k ]School of Public Health and Community, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University; , Gothenburg, Sweden
                [l ]Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund University; , Lund, Sweden
                Author notes
                CONTACT C Stridsman caroline.stridsman@ 123456norrbotten.se Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine, the OLIN-unit, Umeå University; , Sunderby Hospital, 97180 Luleå, Umeå, Sweden
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6622-3838
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4387-4096
                Article
                1833412
                10.1080/20018525.2020.1833412
                7594834
                33224453
                d075c534-dcbe-4d0a-87e0-dcea52eec081
                © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 4, References: 43, Pages: 1
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Article

                asthma,asthma control,copd,health status,quality register,treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article