46
views
1
recommends
+1 Recommend
3 collections
    1
    shares

      For submission information please click on this link: https://www.hogrefe.com/eu/service/for-journal-authors

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Do Sexist Comments Hinder Participation in Online Political Discussions? : A Preregistered Experiment

      1 , 2
      Journal of Media Psychology
      Hogrefe Publishing Group

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Abstract: Women who visibly engage in politics online experience a lot of backlash. The presented study investigates sexist incivility against women in online political spaces as a possible explanation for the gender gap in online political discussion and expression. Online sexism solidifies the masculine norm in online political spaces. Drawing on social cognitive theory and the theory of normative social behavior, we understand online incivility as communication mechanisms that enforce gender norms in online political discussions. We use a preregistered online survey experiment with German Internet users to investigate how sexist comments in online political discussions affect women’s participation in the discussion, perceived social norms about participating, and their internal political efficacy. We found no effects of sexist comments on the propensity to engage in the discussion or the political efficacy to contribute. However, the presence of sexist comments increased the fear of sanctions in both men and women. The null findings of the preregistered experiment occurred despite sufficient statistical power and a successful treatment check. We discuss several possible explanations for the null effects and ways forward.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Book: not found

            Social Foundations of Thought and Action : A Social Cognitive Theory

            Presents a comprehensive theory of human motivation and action from a social-cognitive perspective. This insightful text addresses the prominent roles played by cognitive, vicarious, self-regulatory, and self-reflective processes in psychosocial functioning; emphasizes reciprocal causation through the interplay of cognitive, behavioral, and environmental factors; and systematically applies the basic principles of this theory to personal and social change.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Feminized management and backlash toward agentic women: the hidden costs to women of a kinder, gentler image of middle managers.

              Women who display masculine, agentic traits are viewed as violating prescriptions of feminine niceness (L. A. Rudman, 1998). By legitimizing niceness as an employment criterion, "feminization" of management (requiring both agentic and communal traits for managers) may unintentionally promote discrimination against competent women. Participants made hiring recommendations for a feminized or masculine managerial job. Agentic female job applicants were viewed as less socially skilled than agentic males, but this perception only resulted in hiring discrimination for the feminized, not the masculine, job. Communal applicants (regardless of sex) invariably received low hiring ratings. Thus, women must present themselves as agentic to be hireable, but may therefore be seen as interpersonally deficient. Ironically, the feminization of management may legitimize discrimination against competent, agentic women.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Journal of Media Psychology
                Journal of Media Psychology
                Hogrefe Publishing Group
                1864-1105
                2151-2388
                March 02 2023
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Media and Communication, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Germany
                [2 ]Department of Communication, University of Hohenheim, Germany
                Article
                10.1027/1864-1105/a000373
                d098d066-16eb-4c34-a579-cd53fbb5a26b
                © 2023

                https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article