5
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Sex chromosome pairing patterns in male mice of novel Sxr genotypes.

      1 ,
      Chromosoma

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The influence of the sex-reversal factor (Sxr) on X and Y chromosome pairing was examined by comparing males with "novel" and "standard" Sxr genotypes. The novel Sxr males were exceptional in carrying Sxr on their X rather than their Y chromosome, or homozygously on both their X and Y chromosomes, or on a Y chromosome of different origin to that on which the factor arose. Regardless of its chromosomal location, Sxr was found to elevate the frequency of X-Y separation. Univalent X and Y chromosomes were observed to undergo self-association in a variable proportion of spermatocytes of all Sxr-carrying males. There was a suggestion that chromosomal location of the factor could influence the frequency of univalent self-association. Our observations do not support the published hypothesis of Y self-pairing as the cause of the elevated rate of X-Y separation at pachytene in Sxr-carrying males. Rather, they suggest that heterozygosity due to the presence of Sxr in the XY pairing region may be sufficient to disrupt pairing and cause univalence, or alternatively, that Sxr is an inefficient promoter of X-Y pairing initiation.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Chromosoma
          Chromosoma
          0009-5915
          0009-5915
          Mar 1989
          : 97
          : 5
          Affiliations
          [1 ] M.R.C. Radiobiology Unit, Didcot, Oxon, UK.
          Article
          2721310
          d099d711-1c4e-4cd7-9fff-0844e4506827
          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article